| 1. |
- Löwhagen Hendén, Pia, et al.
(författare)
-
General Anesthesia Versus Conscious Sedation for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke: The AnStroke Trial (Anesthesia During Stroke).
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Stroke. - 1524-4628. ; 48:6, s. 1601-1607
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Retrospective studies have found that patients receiving general anesthesia for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke have worse neurological outcome compared with patients receiving conscious sedation. In this prospective randomized single-center study, we investigated the impact of anesthesia technique on neurological outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.Ninety patients receiving endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in 2013 to 2016 were included and randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Difference in neurological outcome at 3 months, measured as modified Rankin Scale score, was analyzed (primary outcome) and early neurological improvement of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and cerebral infarction volume. Age, sex, comorbidities, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, intraprocedural blood pressure, blood glucose, Paco2 and Pco2 modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score, and relevant time intervals were recorded.In the general anesthesia group 19 of 45 patients (42.2%) and in the conscious sedation group 18 of 45 patients (40.0%) achieved a modified Rankin Scale score ≤2 (P=1.00) at 3 months, with no differences in intraoperative blood pressure decline from baseline (P=0.57); blood glucose (P=0.94); PaCO2 (P=0.68); time intervals (P=0.78); degree of successful recanalization, 91.1% versus 88.9% (P=1.00); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours 8 (3-5) versus 9 (2-15; P=0.60); infarction volume, 20 (10-100) versus 20(10-54) mL (P=0.53); and hospital mortality (13.3% in both groups; P=1.00).In endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke, no difference was found between general anesthesia and conscious sedation in neurological outcome 3 months after stroke.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01872884.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Rentzos, Alexandros, 1979
(författare)
-
Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Intravenous thrombolysis is effective in patients with minor stroke but not in patients with moderate or major stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Endovascular stroke treatment offers a high recanalization rate, which is associated with favorable neurological outcome. The aim of our studies was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively, as performed in the Neurointerventional unit of Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Two major anesthesia forms are used in endovascular stroke treatment, general anesthesia, and conscious sedation. The aim was also to evaluate the impact of intra-procedural hypotension and to compare general anesthesia and conscious sedation with respect to radiological and neurological outcome. Methods: Paper I and Paper II are retrospective studies on efficacy and safety of endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior and posterior circulation, respectively. Paper III is a retrospective study on the impact of intraprocedural hypotension on neurological outcome in patients treated under general anesthesia. Paper IV is a prospective randomized study, where patients eligible for endovascular stroke treatment were randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Results: Paper I showed that the successful recanalization rate in endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior circulation was 74%, the complication rate was 5% and favorable neurological outcome at 3 months was found in 42%. Paper II showed successful recanalization in 73% of patients treated for stroke in the posterior circulation with serious procedural complications in 5 % and favorable outcome in 35% at 3 months. Paper III showed that a fall in mean arterial pressure of >40% is an independent predictor of poor neurological outcome. Paper IV showed no difference in neurological outcome at 3 months between patients randomized to general anesthesia or conscious sedation when a strict protocol for avoidance of intra-procedural hypotension was followed. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the anterior and posterior circulation can achieve high recanalization rates with low complication rates. Intra-procedural hypotension is associated with poor neurological outcome but the choice of anesthesia method does not influence the neurological outcome if severe hypotension is avoided.
|
|
