| 1. |
- Webb, Dominic-Luc, et al.
(author)
-
The type 2 CCK/gastrin receptor antagonist YF476 acutely prevents NSAID-induced gastric ulceration while increasing iNOS expression
- 2013
-
In: Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology. - : Springer Verlag (Germany). - 0028-1298 .- 1432-1912. ; 386:1, s. 41-49
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- YF476 differs from the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) esomeprazole in mode of action by antagonizing the type 2 receptor of cholecystokinin/gastrin (CCK-2R). YF476 protection against diclofenac-induced gastric ulcers was compared to esomeprazole and correlated with plasma levels of hormones related to gastric pH (gastrin, ghrelin, and somatostatin), gastric gene expression of these hormones, their receptors, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). YF476 or esomeprazole pretreatments were followed by diclofenac. Four hours later, gastric tissue was excised and analyzed for ulcer index. An intragastrically implanted Bravo capsule measured pH for 5 days during YF476 plus pentagastrin treatment. Changes in gene expression were assayed for gastrin, ghrelin, and somatostatin; their receptors; and iNOS. YF476 acutely (within 4 h) protected against diclofenac-induced gastric ulcers equivalent to esomeprazole. Gastric pH recorded during 5 days in the presence of pentagastrin was 1.83 (+/- 0.06). YF476 raised pH to 3.67 (+/- 0.09) and plasma ghrelin, gastrin, and somatostatin increased. YF476 increased gene expression of somatostatin receptor and gastrin, while ghrelin receptor decreased; transcripts coding ghrelin, somatostatin, and CCK-2R remained unchanged. In the presence of diclofenac, esomeprazole increased expression of all these transcripts and that of iNOS, while YF476 yielded only decreased CCK-2R and increased iNOS transcripts. YF476 is a potential new preventative treatment for patients at risk of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulceration. Gastric gene expressions of ghrelin, gastrin, and somatostatin and their receptors differ between esomeprazole and YF476. Despite these differences and different modes of action to raise gastric pH, both drugs acutely increase iNOS, suggesting iNOS expression parallels pH.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bassil, A K, et al.
(author)
-
Little or no ability of obestatin to interact with ghrelin or modify motility in the rat gastrointestinal tract.
- 2007
-
In: British Journal of Pharmacology. - : Wiley. - 0007-1188 .- 1476-5381. ; 150:1, s. 58-64
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Obestatin, encoded by the ghrelin gene may inhibit gastrointestinal (GI) motility. This activity was re-investigated.EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Rat GI motility was studied in vitro (jejunum contractility and cholinergically-mediated contractions of forestomach evoked by electrical field stimulation; EFS) and in vivo (gastric emptying and intestinal myoelectrical activity). Ghrelin receptor function was studied using a GTPgammaS assay and transfected cells.KEY RESULTS: Contractions of the jejunum or forestomach were unaffected by obestatin 100 nM or 0.01-1000 nM, respectively (P>0.05 each; n=4-18). Obestatin (0.1-1 nM) reduced the ability of ghrelin 1 microM to facilitate EFS-evoked contractions of the stomach (increases were 42.7+/-7.8% and 21.2+/-5.0 % in the absence and presence of obestatin 1 nM; P<0.05; n=12); higher concentrations (10-1000 nM) tended to reduce the response to ghrelin but changes were not statistically significant. Similar concentrations of obestatin did not significantly reduce a facilitation of contractions caused by the 5-HT(4) receptor agonist prucalopride, although an inhibitory trend occurred at the higher concentrations (increases were 69.3+/-14.0% and 42.6+/-8.7% in the absence and presence of 1000 nM obestatin; n=10). Obestatin (up to 10 microM) did not modulate recombinant ghrelin receptor function. Ghrelin increased gastric emptying and reduced MMC cycle time; obestatin (1000 and 30,000 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) had no effects. Obestatin (2500 pmol kg(-1) min(-1), starting 10 min before ghrelin) did not prevent the ability of ghrelin (500 pmol kg(-1) min(-1)) to shorten MMC cycle time.CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Obestatin has little ability to modulate rat GI motility.
|
|
| 3. |
- Rudholm, Tobias, et al.
(author)
-
Bravo capsule system optimizes intragastric pH monitoring over prolonged time : Effects of ghrelin on gastric acid and hormone secretion in the rat
- 2008
-
In: World Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.. - 1007-9327 .- 2219-2840. ; 14:40, s. 6180-6187
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: To evaluate measurements of intragastric pH with the Bravo capsule system over a prolonged time. Methods: A Bravo capsule was placed inside the rat gastric body and pH was studied for periods up to five consecutive. days. For comparison, a gastric fistula model was used. Effects of ghrelin and esomeprazole, with or without pentagastrin, on gastric pH were studied. In addition, effects of esomeprazole on plasma ghrelin, gastrin and somatostatin were analyzed. Results: All rats recovered after surgery. The average 24-h pH during free feeding was 2.3 +/- 0.1 (n = 20) with a variation of 18% +/- 6% over 5 d. Ghrelin, 2400 pmol/kg, t.i.d. increased pH from 1.7 +/- 0.1 to 3.1 +/- 0.3 (P < 0.01) as recorded with the Bravo system. After esomeprazole (1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) there was a dose-dependent pH increase of maximally 3.4 +/- 0.1, with day-to-day variation over the entire period of 8% +/- 3%. The fistula and pH studies generated similar results. Acid inhibition with esomeprazole increased plasma ghrelin from 10 +/- 2 pmol/L to 65 +/- 26 pmol/L (P < 0.001), and somatostatin from 10 +/- 2 pmol/L to 67 +/- 18 pmol/L (P < 0.001). Conclusion: pH measurements with the Bravo capsule are reliable, and comparable to those of the gastric fistula model. The Bravo system optimizes accurate intragastric pH monitoring over prolonged periods and allows both short- and long-term evaluation of effects of drugs and hormones.
|
|
| 4. |
- Rudholm, Tobias, et al.
(author)
-
Release of regulatory gut peptides somatostatin, neurotensin and vasoactive intestinal peptide by acid and hyperosmolal solutions in the intestine in conscious rats
- 2009
-
In: Regulatory Peptides. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-0115 .- 1873-1686. ; 152:1-3, s. 8-12
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The impact of exposure of the intestinal mucosa to acid and hyperosmolal solutions on the release of the inhibitory gut peptides somatostatin (SOM), neurotensin (NT) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was studied in conscious rats during pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion. The animals were equipped with a chronic gastric fistula to measure acid secretion and a jejunal Thiry-Vella loop for intestinal challenge with saline, hydrochloric acid (HCl, 200 mmol L-1) or hyperosmolal polyethylene glycol (PEG, 1200 mOsm kg(-1)). Gut peptide concentrations were measured in intestinal perfusates, and in plasma samples collected during stimulated acid secretion, and at the end of experiments with luminal challenge of the loops. After pentagastrin-stimulation acid secretion was dose-dependently inhibited by intravenous administration of the gastrin receptor antagonist gastrazole, as well as ranitidine and esomeprazole by maximally 73 +/- 10%; 95 +/- 3%; 90 10%, respectively. Acid perfusion of the Thiry-Vella loop caused a prominent release of SOM both to the lumen (from 7.2 +/- 5.0 to 1279 +/- 580 pmol L-1) and to the circulation (from 18 +/- 5.2 to 51 +/- 9.0 pmol L-1) simultaneously with an inhibition of gastric acid secretion. The release of NTand VIP was not affected to the same extent. PEG perfusion of the loop caused a release of SOM as well as NT and VIP, but less. Simultaneously acid secretion was slightly decreased. In conclusion, intestinal perfusion with acid or hyperosmolal solutions mainly releases SOM, which seems to exert a major inhibitory action in the gut, as shown by inhibition of acid secretion. The other peptides NT and VIP also participate in this action but to a much lesser degree. The operative pathways of these gut peptides hence involve both endocrine (SOM) and paracrine actions (SOM, NT, VIP) in order to exert inhibitory functions on the stomach. The inhibitory action of gastrazole, was in a similar range as that of SOM implying that physiological acid-induced inhibition of gastric acid may primarily be exerted through inhibition of gastrin endocrine secretion.
|
|
