| 1. |
- Jeremiasen, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Improvements in esophageal and gastric cancer care in Sweden-population-based results 2007-2016 from a national quality register
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694 .- 1442-2050. ; 33:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer was launched in 2006 and contains data with adequate national coverage and of high internal validity on patients diagnosed with these tumors. The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of esophageal and gastric cancer care as reflected in a population-based clinical registry. The study population was 12,242 patients (6,926 with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers and 5,316 with gastric cancers) diagnosed between 2007 and 2016. Treatment strategies, short- and long-term mortality, gender aspects, and centralization were investigated. Neoadjuvant oncological treatment became increasingly prevalent during the study period. Resection rates for both esophageal/GEJ and gastric cancers decreased from 29.4% to 26.0% (P=0.022) and from 38.8% to 33.3% (P=0.002), respectively. A marked reduction in the number of hospitals performing esophageal and gastric cancer surgery was noted. In gastric cancer patients, an improvement in 30-day mortality from 4.2% to 1.6% (P=0.005) was evident. Overall 5-year survival after esophageal resection was 38.9%, being higher among women compared to men (47.5 vs. 36.6%; P<0.001), whereas no gender difference was seen in gastric cancer. During the recent decade, the analyses based on the Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer database demonstrated significant improvements in several important quality indicators of care for patients with esophagogastric cancers. The Swedish National Register for Esophageal and Gastric cancer offers an instrument not only for the control and endorsement of quality of care but also a unique tool for population-based clinical research.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ericson, J, et al.
(författare)
-
Large-diameter (30-35 mm) pneumatic balloon dilatation of the pylorus in patients with gastric outlet obstruction symptoms after esophagectomy
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. - : SAGE Publications. - 1799-7267. ; 102:2, s. 83-86
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Functional gastric outlet obstruction is a common problem after esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating this group of patients with pneumatic dilatation of the pyloric sphincter region using a large-diameter (30–35 mm) balloon. Material and Methods: A review of all patients who had undergone pneumatic dilatation of the pylorus sphincter because of gastric outlet obstruction symptoms after esophagectomy at the Karolinska University Hospital from 2006–2011 was completed. Main outcomes were recordings of nausea, regurgitation and bloating. Results: A total of 13 patients received pneumatic dilatation after an esophagectomy. The median time between esophagectomy and the first dilatation was 100 days, and the patients underwent a total of 21 dilatations (1–3 per patient) to a final median diameter of 30 mm. No procedure-related complications occurred. The median follow-up time was 205 days, and nausea and regurgitation improved significantly (p < 0.001, Fisher’s test). Conclusions: Pneumatic dilatation of the pylorus using a large-diameter pneumatic balloon seems to be a safe and effective method for treating symptoms suggestive of gastric outlet obstruction after esophagectomy. To document its true effectiveness, a randomized and sham-controlled study is needed.
|
|
| 3. |
- Linder, Gustav, et al.
(författare)
-
Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer
- 2016
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 103:10, s. 1326-1335
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) was launched in 2006. Data are reported at diagnosis (diagnostic survey), at the time of surgery (surgical survey) and at first outpatient follow-up (follow-up survey). The aim of this study was to evaluate data originating from NREV in terms of comparability, completeness, accuracy and timeliness. Methods: Coding routines were compared with international standards and completeness was evaluated by means of a 5-year (2009–2013) comparison with mandatory national registers. Validity was tested by comparison with reabstracted data from source medical records in 400 patients chosen randomly with stratification for hospital size and catchment area population. Timeliness of registration was described. Results: Coding routines followed national and international guidelines. Compared with the Swedish Cancer Registry from 2009 to 2013, 6069 (95·5 per cent) of 6354 patients were registered in NREV at the time of data extraction. Of 60 variables investigated, 10 966 of 12 035 original entries were correct in the reabstraction, resulting in an exact agreement of 91·1 per cent in the register. There were 782 (6·5 per cent) incorrect and 287 (2·4 per cent) missing entries. Median time to registration was 3·9, 3·4 and 4·1 months for diagnostic, surgical and follow-up surveys respectively. Conclusion: NREV has reached a position with good coverage of those with the relevant diagnoses, and contains comparable and valid data. Quality data on each variable are available. Timeliness is an area with potential for improvement.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Busweiler, L A D, et al.
(författare)
-
International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery
- 2019
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2474-9842. ; 3:1, s. 62-73
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Benchmarking on an international level might lead to improved outcomes at a national level. The aim of this study was to compare treatment and surgical outcome data from the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).Methods: All patients with primary oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent a resection and were registered in NREV or DUCA between 2012 and 2014 were included. Differences in 30-day mortality were analysed using case mix-adjusted multivariable logistic regression.Results: In total, 4439 patients underwent oesophagectomy (2509 patients) or gastrectomy (1930 patients). Estimated resection rates were comparable. Swedish patients were older but had less advanced disease and less co-morbidity than Dutch patients. Neoadjuvant treatment rates were lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands, both for patients who underwent oesophagectomy (68·6 versus 90·0 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) and for those having gastrectomy (38·3 versus 56·6 per cent; P < 0·001). In Sweden, transthoracic oesophagectomy was performed in 94·7 per cent of patients, whereas in the Netherlands, a transhiatal approach was undertaken in 35·8 per cent. Higher annual procedural volumes per hospital were observed in the Netherlands. Adjusted 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality after gastrectomy was statistically significantly lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands (odds ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 0·95).Conclusion: For oesophageal and gastric cancer, there are differences in patient, tumour and treatment characteristics between Sweden and the Netherlands. Postoperative mortality in patients with gastric cancer was lower in Sweden.
|
|
| 6. |
- Insulander, J., et al.
(författare)
-
Prognosis following surgical bypass compared with laparotomy alone in unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- 2016
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 103:9, s. 1200-1208
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Resection with curative intent has been shown to prolong survival of patients with locoregional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, up to 33 per cent of patients are deemed unresectable at exploratory laparotomy owing to unanticipated locally advanced or metastatic disease. In these patients, prophylactic double bypass (PDB) procedures have been considered the standard of care. The aim of this study was to compare PDB with exploratory laparotomy alone in terms of impact on postoperative course, chemotherapy and overall survival.Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study (2004-2013) was conducted using a prospective institutional database. Patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable PDAC were included. Relationships between PDB procedures, exploratory laparotomy alone, postoperative chemotherapy and best supportive care were investigated by means of Cox regression. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimations and log rank test.Results: Of 503 patients with PDAC scheduled for resection with curative intent, 104 were deemed unresectable at laparotomy (resection rate 79·3 per cent). Seventy-four patients underwent PDB procedures and 30 had exploratory laparotomy alone. PDB and exploratory laparotomy were similar in terms of perioperative mortality, initiation of chemotherapy and overall survival. Compared with best supportive care, postoperative chemotherapy prolonged survival (8·0 versus 14·4 months in locally advanced PDAC, P = 0·007; 2·3 versus 8·0 months in metastatic PDAC, P < 0·001). Patients undergoing chemotherapy following exploratory laparotomy alone had longer median overall survival than patients undergoing chemotherapy following PDB procedures (16·3 versus 10·3 months; P = 0·040).Conclusion: Patients with pancreatic cancer deemed unresectable at laparotomy may derive survival benefit from subsequent chemotherapy as opposed to supportive care alone. At laparotomy, proceeding with a bypass procedure for prophylactic symptom control may be prognostically unfavourable.
|
|
| 7. |
- Klevebro, F., et al.
(författare)
-
Morbidity and mortality after surgery for cancer of the oesophagus and astro-oesophageal junction : a randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant hemotherapy vs. neoadjuvant chemoradiation
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 41:7, s. 920-926
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To compare the incidence and severity of postoperative omplications after oesophagectomy for carcinoma of the oesophagus and astro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) after randomized accrual to eoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). ackground: Neoadjuvant therapy improves long-term survival after esophagectomy. To date, evidence is insufficient to determine whether ombined nCT, or nCRT alone, is the most beneficial. ethods: Patients with carcinoma of the oesophagus or GOJ, resectable ith a curative intention, were enrolled in this multicenter trial onducted at seven centres in Sweden and Norway. Study participants re andomized to nCT or nCRT followed by surgery with two-field ymphadenectomy. Three cycles of cisplatin/5-fluorouracil was dministered in all patients, while 40 Gy of concomitant radiotherapy as administered in the nCRT group. esults: Of the randomized 181 patients, 91 were assigned to nCT and 90 o nCRT. One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients, 78 nCT and 77 nCRT, nderwent resection. There was no statistically significant difference etween the groups in the incidence of surgical or nonsurgical omplications (P-value = 0.69 and 0.13, respectively). There was no 0-day mortality, while the 90-day mortality was 3% (2/78) in the nCT roup and 6% (5/77) in the nCRT group (P = 0.24). The median lavien-Dindo complication severity grade was significantly higher in he nCRT. group (P = 0.001). onclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of omplications between patients randomized to nCT and nCRT. However, omplications were significantly more severe after nCRT. Registration rial database: The trial was registered in the Clinical Trials tabase registration number NCT01362127).
|
|
| 8. |
- Kumagai, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Survival benefit and additional value of preoperative chemoradiotherapy in resectable gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer : A direct and adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 41:3, s. 282-294
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Several phase I/II studies of chemoradiotherapy for gastric cancer have reported promising results, but the significance of preoperative radiotherapy in addition to chemotherapy has not been proven. In this study, a systematic literature search was performed to capture survival and postoperative morbidity and mortality data in randomised clinical studies comparing preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy or chemotherapy versus surgery alone, or preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy for gastric and/or gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer. Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall mortality were extracted from the original studies, individual patient data provided from the principal investigators of eligible studies or the earlier published meta-analysis. The incidences of postoperative morbidities and mortalities were also analysed. In total 18 studies were eligible and data were available from 14 of these. The meta-analysis on overall survival yielded HRs of 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.86, P < 0.001) for preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and 0.83 (95% CI 0.67-1.01, P = 0.065) for preoperative chemotherapy when compared to surgery alone. Direct comparison between preoperative chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy resulted in an HR of 0.71 (95% CI 0.45-1.12, P = 0.146). Combination of direct and adjusted indirect comparisons yielded an HR of 0.86 (95% CI 0.69-1.07, P = 0.171). No statistically significant differences were seen in the risk for postoperative morbidity or mortality between preoperative treatments and surgery alone, or preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy for gastric and GOJ cancer showed significant survival benefit over surgery alone. In comparisons between preoperative chemotherapy and (chemo)radiotherapy, there is a trend towards improved survival when adding radiotherapy, without increased postoperative morbidity or mortality.
|
|
| 9. |
- Lund, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Nitric oxide and endothelin-1 release after one-lung ventilation during thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Diseases of the esophagus. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1120-8694. ; 26:8, s. 853-858
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- One-lung ventilation (OLV) is applied during esophagectomy to improve exposure during the thoracic part of the operation. Collapse of lung tissue, shunting of pulmonary blood flow, and changes in alveolar oxygenation during and after OLV may possibly induce an ischemia-reperfusion response in the lung, which may affect the pulmonary endothelium. Such a reaction might thereby contribute to the frequently occurring respiratory complications among these patients. In this small trial, 30 patients were randomized to either OLV (n= 16) or two-lung ventilation (TLV, n= 14) during esophagectomy. Central venous and arterial plasma samples were taken before and after OLV/TLV for analysis of nitrite and a metabolite of nitric oxide (NO), and also during the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 10th postoperative day for analysis of endothelin, another endothelium-derived vasoactive mediator. Lung biopsies were taken before and after OLV or TLV, and analyzed regarding immunofluorescence for isoform of NO synthase, a protein upregulated during inflammatory response and also vascular congestion. No changes in lung isoform of NO synthase immunofluorescence or vascular congestion were registered after neither OLV nor TLV. Plasma nitrite and endothelin levels were similar in the two study groups. We conclude that OLV does not seem to have any influence on key regulators of pulmonary vascular tone and inflammation, i.e. NO and endothelin. From this perspective, OLV seems to be a safe method, which defends its clinical position to facilitate surgical exposure during thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.
|
|
| 10. |
- Sanjeevi, Srinivas, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of delay between imaging and treatment in patients with potentially curable pancreatic cancer
- 2015
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 103:3, s. 267-275
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Locoregional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may progress rapidly and/or disseminate despite having an early stage at diagnostic imaging. A prolonged interval from imaging to resection might represent a risk factor for encountering tumour progression at laparotomy. The aim of this study was to determine the therapeutic window for timely surgical intervention.Methods: This observational cohort study included patients with histologically confirmed PDAC scheduled for resection with curative intent from 2008 to 2014. The impact of imaging-to-resection/reassessment (IR) interval, vascular involvement and tumour size on local tumour progression or presence of metastases at reimaging or laparotomy was evaluated using univariable and multivariable regression. Risk estimates were approximated using hazard ratios (HRs).Results: Median IR interval was 42 days. Of 349 patients scheduled for resection, 82 had unresectable disease (resectability rate 76.5 per cent). The unresectability rate was zero when the IR interval was 22 days or shorter, and was lower for an IR interval of 32 days or less compared with longer waiting times (13 versus 26.2 per cent; HR 0.42, P = 0.021). It was also lower for tumours smaller than 30 mm than for larger tumours (13.9 versus 32.5 per cent; HR 0.34, P < 0.001). Tumours with no or minor vascular involvement showed decreased rates of unresectable disease (20.6 per cent versus 38 per cent when there was major or combined vascular involvement; HR 0.43, P = 0.007). However, this failed to reach statistical significance on multivariable analysis (P = 0.411), in contrast to IR interval (P = 0.028) and tumour size (P < 0.001).Conclusion: Operation within 32 days of diagnostic imaging reduced the risk of tumour progression to unresectable disease by half compared with a longer waiting time. The results of this study highlight the importance of efficient clinical PDAC management.
|
|
