SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ri-24540"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ri-24540" > An Industrial Surve...

  • de la Vara, José LuisCarlos III University of Madrid, Spain,Carlos III University of Madrid, ESP,Computer Science Department, (författare)

An Industrial Survey of Safety Evidence Change Impact Analysis Practice

  • 13
  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2016

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • IEEE,2016
  • electronicrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:ri-24540
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-24540URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2016.2553032DOI
  • https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/acee44cc-b3de-4737-889c-c9d9ad30846fURI
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-13689URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • In many application domains, critical systems must comply with safety standards. This involves gathering safety evidence in the form of artefacts such as safety analyses, system specifications, and testing results. These artefacts can evolve during a system's lifecycle, creating a need for impact analysis to guarantee that system safety and compliance are not jeopardised. Although extensive research has been conducted on change impact analysis and on safety evidence management, the knowledge about how safety evidence change impact analysis is addressed in practice is limited. This paper reports on a survey targeted at filling this gap by analysing the circumstances under which safety evidence change impact analysis is addressed, the tool support used, and the challenges faced. We obtained 97 valid responses representing 16 application domains, 28 countries, and 47 safety standards. The results suggest that most practitioners deal with safety evidence change impact analysis during system development and mainly from system specifications. Furthermore, the level of automation in the process is low and insufficient tool support is the most frequent challenge. Other notable findings include that the different artefact types used as safety evidence seem to co-evolve, the evolution of safety case should probably be better managed, and no commercial impact analysis tool has been reported as used for all artefact types. Finally, we identified over 20 areas where the state of the practice in safety evidence change impact analysis can be improved.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Borg, MarkusLund University,Lunds universitet,RISE,Security Lab,Institutionen för datavetenskap,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Department of Computer Science,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH,SICS Swedish ICT AB, SWE(Swepub:lu)csz-mkb (författare)
  • Wnuk, KrzysztofBlekinge Tekniska Högskola,Lund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för datavetenskap,Institutioner vid LTH,Lunds Tekniska Högskola,Department of Computer Science,Departments at LTH,Faculty of Engineering, LTH,Institutionen för programvaruteknik,SERL(Swepub:bth)krw (författare)
  • Moonen, LeonBlekinge Institute of Technology,Certus Centre for Software V&V, Simula Research Laboratory (författare)
  • Carlos III University of Madrid, SpainCarlos III University of Madrid, ESP (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering: IEEE42:12, s. 1095-11170098-55891939-3520

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy