Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ri-38101" >
Evaluation of resil...
Evaluation of resilience assessment methodologies
-
- Rød, Bjarte (författare)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
-
- Pursiainen, Christer (författare)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
-
- Reitan, Nina Kristine (författare)
- RISE,Fire Research Norge
-
visa fler...
-
- Storesund, Karolina (författare)
- RISE,Fire Research Norge
-
- Lange, David (författare)
- RISE,Safety
-
- Mira da Silva, Miguel (författare)
- INOV INESC Inovação, Portugal
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2017-06-07
- 2017
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. - CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 : CRC Press/Balkema. - 9781138629370 ; , s. 1039-1052
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- There are a wide range of different frameworks and methodologies for analysing Critical Infrastructure (CI) resilience, covering organisational, technological and social resilience. However, there is a lack of a clear methodology combining these three resilience domains into one framework. The final goal of the ongoing EU-project IMPROVER, ‘Improved risk evaluation and implementation of resilience concepts to Critical Infrastructure,’ is to develop one single improved and easy-to-use critical infrastructure resilience analysis tool which will be applicable within all resilience domains and to all types of critical infrastructure. This article presents part of this work, in which IMPROVER comprehensively evaluated, by demonstration and comparison, a selection of existing resilience methodologies in order to integrate their best features into the new methodology. The selected methodologies were The Benchmark Resilience Tool (BRT) (Lee et al., 2013), Guidelines for Critical Infrastructures Resilience Evaluation (CIRE) (Bertocchi et al., 2016) and the Critical Infrastructure Resilience Index (CIRI). The latter was developed within the consortium (Pursiainen et al., 2017). The results show that it is hard to evaluate and compare the different methodologies considering that the methodologies are not aiming to achieve the same thing. However, this evaluation shows that all the methodologies have pros and cons, and that the IMPROVER project should aim at combining, in so far as is possible and commensurable, the identified pros while avoiding the identified cons into a Critical Infrastructure resilience assessment framework compatible with the current guidelines for risk assessment in the Member States. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, London.
Nyckelord
- Public works
- Reliability theory
- Risk assessment
- Safety engineering
- Analysis tools
- Assessment methodologies
- Eu projects
- Infrastructure resiliences
- Organisational
- Risk evaluation
- Critical infrastructures
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- kon (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas