SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ri-38101"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:ri-38101" > Evaluation of resil...

Evaluation of resilience assessment methodologies

Rød, Bjarte (författare)
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Pursiainen, Christer (författare)
UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
Reitan, Nina Kristine (författare)
RISE,Fire Research Norge
visa fler...
Storesund, Karolina (författare)
RISE,Fire Research Norge
Lange, David (författare)
RISE,Safety
Mira da Silva, Miguel (författare)
INOV INESC Inovação, Portugal
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2017-06-07
2017
Engelska.
Ingår i: Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017. - CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 : CRC Press/Balkema. - 9781138629370 ; , s. 1039-1052
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • There are a wide range of different frameworks and methodologies for analysing Critical Infrastructure (CI) resilience, covering organisational, technological and social resilience. However, there is a lack of a clear methodology combining these three resilience domains into one framework. The final goal of the ongoing EU-project IMPROVER, ‘Improved risk evaluation and implementation of resilience concepts to Critical Infrastructure,’ is to develop one single improved and easy-to-use critical infrastructure resilience analysis tool which will be applicable within all resilience domains and to all types of critical infrastructure. This article presents part of this work, in which IMPROVER comprehensively evaluated, by demonstration and comparison, a selection of existing resilience methodologies in order to integrate their best features into the new methodology. The selected methodologies were The Benchmark Resilience Tool (BRT) (Lee et al., 2013), Guidelines for Critical Infrastructures Resilience Evaluation (CIRE) (Bertocchi et al., 2016) and the Critical Infrastructure Resilience Index (CIRI). The latter was developed within the consortium (Pursiainen et al., 2017). The results show that it is hard to evaluate and compare the different methodologies considering that the methodologies are not aiming to achieve the same thing. However, this evaluation shows that all the methodologies have pros and cons, and that the IMPROVER project should aim at combining, in so far as is possible and commensurable, the identified pros while avoiding the identified cons into a Critical Infrastructure resilience assessment framework compatible with the current guidelines for risk assessment in the Member States. © 2017 Taylor & Francis Group, London.

Nyckelord

Public works
Reliability theory
Risk assessment
Safety engineering
Analysis tools
Assessment methodologies
Eu projects
Infrastructure resiliences
Organisational
Risk evaluation
Critical infrastructures

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kon (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy