SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-199124"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-199124" > Recycled text and r...

Recycled text and risk communication in natural gas pipeline environmental impact assessments

Hileman, Jacob D. (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre,Uppsala University, Sweden,Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS); Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Angst, Mario (författare)
Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Uberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland.;Univ Zurich, Digital Soc Initiat, Ramistr 69, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland.
Scott, Tyler A. (författare)
Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, One Shields Ave, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
visa fler...
Sundström, Emma (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre,Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Kraftriket 2B, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2021
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Energy Policy. - : Elsevier BV. - 0301-4215 .- 1873-6777. ; 156
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Under the U.S. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), energy infrastructure projects that are permitted by federal agencies require preparation and publication of an environmental impact assessment. However, fifty years after the passage of NEPA, agencies’ compliance behaviors, and how these behaviors might shape the risks associated with energy infrastructure, remain largely unexplored. Here, we consider how assessment documents from forty-six of the largest U.S. natural gas pipeline mega-projects address landslide risks. Using a series of text mining and content analysis methods, we evaluate the prevalence of recycled text across assessments. We find that text similarity does not correspond closely to reported risk levels – in many cases, common verbiage is used and only project-specific details (e.g., locations, numeric figures) are substituted. While such approaches likely expedite preparation of assessments and facilitate knowledge transfer between projects, we argue that common text potentially hinders clear communication of differential risks to decision-makers and the public, who may lack the technical expertise to contextualize the magnitude and severity of reported figures. In light of ongoing policy efforts to streamline lengthy and costly energy infrastructure permitting processes under NEPA, it is vital that such efforts do not undermine the risk communication requirements of the review process.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap -- Miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences -- Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Environmental impact assessment
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Landslide risk
Natural gas pipeline
Risk communication
Text similarity

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy