Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-211094" > Transforming US urb...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 03631naa a2200385 4500 | |
001 | oai:DiVA.org:su-211094 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 221110s2023 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-2110942 URI |
024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.1045912 DOI |
040 | a (SwePub)su | |
041 | a engb eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Grabowski, Zbigniew J.4 aut |
245 | 1 0 | a Transforming US urban green infrastructure planning to address equity |
264 | 1 | b Elsevier BV,c 2023 |
338 | a print2 rdacarrier | |
520 | a Cities across the Unites States have embraced green infrastructure (GI) in official planning efforts. The plans conceptualize GI as providing multiple functions and benefits for urban residents, and form part of complex responses to intersectional urban challenges of social injustice and inequity, climate change, aging and expensive infrastructure, and socio-economic change. To date, it is unclear whether official city GI programs address systemic racism and urban inequality. To fill this knowledge gap, we coded and analyzed 122 formal plans from 20 US cities to examine if and how they address equity and justice in three domains: visions, processes, and distributions. We find a widespread failure of plans to conceptualize and operationalize equity planning prin-ciples. Only 13% of plans define equity or justice. Only 30% of cities recognize that they are on Native land. Over 90% of plans do not utilize inclusive processes to plan, design, implement, or evaluate GI, and so target many communities for green improvements without their consent. Although 80% of plans use GI to manage hazards and provide multiple benefits with GI, less than 10% identify the causes of uneven distributions and vulnera-bility. Even fewer recognize related issues of houselessness and gentrification. Very few plans have mechanisms to build community wealth through new GI jobs. We find promising seeds of best practices in some cities and plan types, but no plan exemplified best practices across all equity dimensions. If formal GI planning in US cities does not explicitly and comprehensively address equity concerns, it may reproduce the inequalities that GI is meant to alleviate. Based on our results, we identify-three key needs to improve current GI planning practices for green infrastructure and equity. First, clear definitions of equity and justice are needed, second, planning must engage with causes of inequality and displacement, and third, urban GI planning needs to be transformed through a focus on inclusion. | |
650 | 7 | a SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAPx Annan samhällsvetenskap0 (SwePub)5092 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a SOCIAL SCIENCESx Other Social Sciences0 (SwePub)5092 hsv//eng |
653 | a Equity | |
653 | a Green infrastructure | |
653 | a Urban planning | |
653 | a USA | |
653 | a Environmental justice | |
653 | a Regional & Urban Planning | |
700 | 1 | a McPhearson, Timonu Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre,New School, New York, USA; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, USA4 aut0 (Swepub:su)tmcph |
700 | 1 | a Pickett, Steward T. A.4 aut |
710 | 2 | a Stockholms universitetb Stockholm Resilience Centre4 org |
773 | 0 | t Landscape and Urban Planningd : Elsevier BVg 229q 229x 0169-2046x 1872-6062 |
856 | 4 | u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591y Fulltext |
856 | 4 8 | u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-211094 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104591 |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy