SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-135678"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-135678" > A comparison of nav...

  • Wezel, JoepLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (författare)

A comparison of navigators, snap-shot field monitoring, and probe-based field model training for correcting B0-induced artifacts in T2*-weighted images at 7 T

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2017

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2016-11-17
  • Wiley,2017
  • printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-135678
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-135678URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26524DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • PurposeTo compare methods for estimating B0 maps used in retrospective correction of high-resolution anatomical images at ultra-high field strength. The B0 maps were obtained using three methods: (1) 1D navigators and coil sensitivities, (2) field probe (FP) data and a low-order spherical harmonics model, and (3) FP data and a training-based model.MethodsData from nine subjects were acquired while they performed activities inducing B0 field fluctuations. Estimated B0 fields were compared with reference data, and the reductions of artifacts were compared in corrected T2* images.ResultsReduction of sum-of-squares difference relative to a reference image was evaluated, and Method 1 yielded the largest artifact reduction: 27 ± 15%, 20 ± 18% (mean ± 1 standard deviation) for deep breathing and combined deep breathing and hand motion activities. Method 3 performed almost as well (24 ± 18%, 15 ± 17%), provided that adequate training data were used, and Method 2 gave a similar result (21 ± 16%, 19 ± 17%).ConclusionThis study confirms that all of the investigated methods can be used in retrospective image correction. In terms of image quality, Method 1 had a small advantage, whereas the FP-based methods measured the B0 field slightly more accurately. The specific strengths and weaknesses of FPs and navigators should therefore be considered when determining which B0-estimation method to use. 

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Boer, Vincent O.University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (författare)
  • van der Velden, Tijl A.University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (författare)
  • Webb, Andrew G.Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (författare)
  • Klomp, Dennis W.J.University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (författare)
  • Versluis, Maarten J.Philips Healthcare Benelux, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (författare)
  • van Osch, Matthias J.P.Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands (författare)
  • Garpebring, AndersUmeå universitet,Radiofysik,Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands(Swepub:umu)anga0014 (författare)
  • Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The NetherlandsUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: Wiley78, s. 1373-13820740-31941522-2594

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy