Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-160337" > Analysing the house...
Fältnamn | Indikatorer | Metadata |
---|---|---|
000 | 03589naa a2200397 4500 | |
001 | oai:DiVA.org:umu-160337 | |
003 | SwePub | |
008 | 190617s2019 | |||||||||||000 ||eng| | |
024 | 7 | a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-1603372 URI |
024 | 7 | a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.0342 DOI |
040 | a (SwePub)umu | |
041 | a engb eng | |
042 | 9 SwePub | |
072 | 7 | a ref2 swepub-contenttype |
072 | 7 | a art2 swepub-publicationtype |
100 | 1 | a Azizi, Shoaib,d 1989-u Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik,Energy efficiency4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)shaz0006 |
245 | 1 0 | a Analysing the house-owners’ perceptions on benefits and barriers of energy renovation in Swedish single-family houses |
264 | 1 | b Elsevier,c 2019 |
338 | a print2 rdacarrier | |
520 | a Single-family houses offer a large potential for energy savings by energy renovation (ER). Homeowners’ motivation to implement ER derives from the benefits and barriers they perceive. Benefits are the positive consequences that can motivate homeowners to act and barriers are the challenges that demotivate them to undertake ER. Different benefits and barriers do not homogenously affect every homeowner. Identifying motivating benefits and demotivating barriers for each specific group among homeowners can shed lights on ER decision-making and enable policies that are more effective. The objective of this study is to contextualize the implementation of ER by understanding how the perceived benefits and barriers influence homeowners. This study links the expected consequences, which are benefits and barriers to the influential factors on ER, which are used to group the homeowners.The analysis is based on a questionnaire survey mailed to 1550 owners of single-family houses in northern Sweden. The perceptions of homeowners on benefits and barriers of ER are significantly different between the groups that are motivated and unmotivated to implement ER. Despite the perceived importance of some of the benefits such as energy cost reduction, they may not be determinative for the homeowners’ decision to undertake ER. The homeowners are more likely to implement ER for reasons other than energy use reduction such as for improving the indoor environment. The barriers such as the difficulty of finding a low-interest loan and reliable information sources are found to impede the intention to implement ER among different groups. Policy implications to facilitate ER in single-family houses are discussed. | |
650 | 7 | a TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIERx Naturresursteknikx Energisystem0 (SwePub)207022 hsv//swe |
650 | 7 | a ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGYx Environmental Engineeringx Energy Systems0 (SwePub)207022 hsv//eng |
653 | a Energy efficient renovation | |
653 | a Investment decision | |
653 | a Perceptions | |
653 | a Implementation | |
653 | a House-owners | |
653 | a Sweden | |
653 | a environmental science | |
653 | a miljövetenskap | |
700 | 1 | a Nair, Gireeshu Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)gigo0003 |
700 | 1 | a Olofsson, Thomas,d 1968-u Umeå universitet,Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 aut0 (Swepub:umu)thol0001 |
710 | 2 | a Umeå universitetb Institutionen för tillämpad fysik och elektronik4 org |
773 | 0 | t Energy and Buildingsd : Elsevierg 198, s. 187-196q 198<187-196x 0378-7788x 1872-6178 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-160337 |
856 | 4 8 | u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.05.034 |
Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.
Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy