Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-91648" >
Registration and va...
-
Gunnarsson, Ulf,1967-Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
(författare)
Registration and validity of surgical complications in colorectal cancer surgery.
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2003
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
2003-01-10
-
Oxford University Press (OUP),2003
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-91648
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-91648URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4058DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
BACKGROUND: Population-based quality registers have become an important tool in quality assessment during the past decade. For registers to be reliable, however, data must be checked carefully for validity.METHODS: The present study describes the validity of surgical complications registered in a national register run by the National Board of Health and Welfare (NBH), a register run by Regional Oncological Centres (ROC) and, for comparison, a local quality assurance system at Uppsala University Hospital (UUH). A specialized, independent surgeon checked 10 per cent of patient records against datasheets from the registers.RESULTS: The local quality assurance system at UUH showed the best validity for surgical complications. Data for complications of colonic cancer surgery were more valid than those for rectal cancer surgery. Registration of serious complications was more valid than that of wound infections. The calculated proportion of missed surgical complications was 0.69, 0.64, 0.40, 0.22 and 0.07 for rectal and colonic cancer in the NBH register, rectal and colonic cancer in the ROC register, and the UUH register respectively. Corresponding figures for reoperation were 0.45, 0.48, 0.04, 0.09 and 0.21.CONCLUSION: Local interest and routine use of data for quality assurance are crucial factors for valid registers. Careful monitoring of validity is necessary for use of registry data in structured systems for improvement of surgical results.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Seligsohn, E
(författare)
-
Jestin, P
(författare)
-
Påhlman, L
(författare)
-
Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:British Journal of Surgery: Oxford University Press (OUP)90:4, s. 454-90007-13231365-2168
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas