SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-16602"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-16602" > Bone substitutes an...

LIBRIS Formathandbok  (Information om MARC21)
FältnamnIndikatorerMetadata
00003089naa a2200289 4500
001oai:DiVA.org:uu-16602
003SwePub
008080529s2008 | |||||||||||000 ||eng|
024a https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-166022 URI
024a https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00251.x2 DOI
040 a (SwePub)uu
041 a engb eng
042 9 SwePub
072 7a ref2 swepub-contenttype
072 7a art2 swepub-publicationtype
100a Hallman, Matsu Uppsala universitet,Centrum för klinisk forskning, Gävleborg4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)mahal425
2451 0a Bone substitutes and growth factors as an alternative/complement to autogenous bone for grafting in implant dentistry
264 1b Wiley,c 2008
338 a print2 rdacarrier
520 a Autogenous bone, with its osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties, has long been considered the ideal grafting material in bone reconstructive surgery (26, 85). However, drawbacks with autogenous bone include morbidity, availability and unpredictable graft resorption (85, 93, 94, 128, 167, 174). Recent advances in biotechnology have provided the implant surgeon with access to a great variety of bone grafting materials and the possibility of easier implant treatment for the patient as well as for the surgeon. However, the perfect grafting material has yet to be identified. Current research focuses on proteins and carriers for delivering growth factors to the surgical site; however, drawbacks of high production costs and unpredictable results exist. The clinical usefulness of a great variety of materials for bone augmentation in implant dentistry has been seriously questioned (56). The use of osteconductive osteobiologics in implant dentistry remains an experimental procedure until more knowledge becomes available regarding the clinical and biologic aspects of these materials. Osteoinduction denotes a process of accelerated bone formation that provides an abbreviated healing period. Using solely an osteoconductive grafting material may prolong the healing period with 2–6 months, which may be of clinical significance. Uncontrolled case reports, which suggest a graft healing period of 3–4 months for osteoconductive deproteinized bovine bone or biphasic materials, may mislead the inexperienced dentist. Furthermore, clinical recommendations seem premature when based upon a few animal studies rather than upon comprehensive long-term investigations in humans. This review discusses clinical studies of bone substitutes, growth factors and bone graft procedures employed with the purpose of augmenting periimplant sites.
653 a MEDICINE
653 a MEDICIN
700a Thor, Andreasu Uppsala universitet,Käkkirurgi4 aut0 (Swepub:uu)antho193
710a Uppsala universitetb Centrum för klinisk forskning, Gävleborg4 org
773t Periodontology 2000d : Wileyg 47:1, s. 172-92q 47:1<172-92x 0906-6713x 1600-0757
8564 8u https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-16602
8564 8u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00251.x

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Hallman, Mats
Thor, Andreas
Artiklar i publikationen
Periodontology 2 ...
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy