SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-455913"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-455913" > What has the COVID-...

  • Lampa, ElinUppsala universitet,Socialmedicin/CHAP (författare)

What has the COVID-19 pandemic taught us about conducting patient and public involvement remotely? : Insights from a series of digital meeting observations

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2021

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2021-10-11
  • Springer Science and Business Media LLC,2021
  • electronicrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:uu-455913
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-455913URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00315-9DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic many work tasks are being done remotely through digital meetings, including PPI in research. Yet, some PPI activities have been paused or cancelled altogether during the pandemic. In this commentary, we share our insights from observing digital meetings with researchers and public contributors, representing vulnerable groups. Additionally, we discuss how remote PPI activities can be understood and improved.Main bodyAs part of a PPI evaluation project, live observations were conducted by two trained observers, using a semi‐structured observation protocol developed to objectively assess aspects of group dynamics in PPI research meetings with public contributors with experience of seeking refuge and parents facing economic hardship. This project’s data collection is ongoing and the insights in this commentary is based on the observers’ discussion. We discuss these insights through the lens of the Media Richness Theory, stating that the choice of media we communicate through should be guided by what kind of information we want to communicate to each other. The more complex the information is, the richer the media tool needs to be. For example, information in a text message is more easily misinterpreted than information given in person. This is because meeting in person gives us more information, for example through body language and tone of voice. Based on our experiences from observing digital research meetings, we give suggestions on how to improve digital meetings with public contributors. A few key points are: actively choosing which media to use; being prepared to guide contributors to the chosen media in a way that is suitable for them; and the increased importance of the person chairing the meeting to actively include all participants.ConclusionsWe reach the conclusion that digital meetings with public contributors is possible, but that researchers need to make a commitment and actively work to solve practical issues. Finally, the format and structure of digital meetings should be co-created together with public contributors.Plain English summaryDuring the COVID-19 pandemic many work tasks are conducted remotely through digital meetings, including PPI in research. Yet, some PPI activities have been paused or cancelled during the pandemic. In this commentary, we share our insights from observing digital meetings with researchers and contributors with experience of seeking refuge and parents facing economic hardship, and discuss how remote collaborations can be improved. This is discussed through the lens of the Media Richness Theory, stating that the choice of media we communicate through should be guided by what kind of information we want to communicate to each other. The more complex the information is, the richer the media tool needs to be. For example, information in a text message is more easily misinterpreted than information given in person, since meeting in person gives us more information, for example through body language and tone of voice. Based on our experiences from observing digital research meetings, we give suggestions on how to improve digital meetings with public contributors. Some key points are: actively choosing which media to use; being prepared to guide contributors to the chosen media in a way that is suitable for them; and the increased importance of the person chairing the meeting to actively include all participants. We reach the conclusion that digital meetings with public contributors is possible, but that researchers need to make a commitment and actively work to solve practical issues. Finally, the format and structure of digital meetings should be co-created together with public contributors.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Sonnentheil, Björn (författare)
  • Tökés, AntóniaUppsala universitet,Socialmedicin/CHAP(Swepub:uu)antto240 (författare)
  • Warner, GeorginaUppsala universitet,Socialmedicin/CHAP(Swepub:uu)geowa922 (författare)
  • Uppsala universitetSocialmedicin/CHAP (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Research Involvement and Engagement: Springer Science and Business Media LLC7:12056-7529

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Lampa, Elin
Sonnentheil, Bjö ...
Tökés, Antónia
Warner, Georgina
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Hälsovetenskap
och Folkhälsovetensk ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Research Involve ...
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy