Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-502277" >
Comparing Outcomes ...
Comparing Outcomes of a Discrete Choice Experiment and Case 2 Best-Worst Scaling : An Application to Neuromuscular Disease Treatment
-
- Soekhai, Vikas (författare)
- Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, PO ?Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
-
- Donkers, Bas (författare)
- Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, PO ?Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
-
- Viberg Johansson, Jennifer (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik,Inst Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
-
visa fler...
-
- Jimenez-Moreno, Cecilia (författare)
- Newcastle Univ, Wellcome Ctr Mitochondrial Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England.;Patient Ctr Res, Evidera, London, England.
-
- Pinto, Cathy Anne (författare)
- Merck & Co Inc, Pharmacoepidemiol, Kenilworth, NJ USA.
-
- de Wit, G. Ardine (författare)
- Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Juliusctr Healthsci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.
-
- de Bekker-Grob, Esther (författare)
- Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, PO ?Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
-
visa färre...
-
Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, PO ?Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands;Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands. Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Choice Modelling Ctr, PO ?Box 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.;Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands. (creator_code:org_t)
- 2023-02-13
- 2023
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Patient. - : Springer Nature. - 1178-1653 .- 1178-1661. ; 16:3, s. 239-253
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://uu.diva-port... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Background and ObjectivesCase 2 best-worst scaling (BWS-2) is an increasingly popular method to elicit patient preferences. Because BWS-2 potentially has a lower cognitive burden compared with discrete choice experiments, the aim of this study was to compare treatment preference weights and relative importance scores.MethodsPatients with neuromuscular diseases completed an online survey at two different moments in time, completing one method per occasion. Patients were randomly assigned to either first a discrete choice experiment or BWS-2. Attributes included: muscle strength, energy endurance, balance, cognition, chance of blurry vision, and chance of liver damage. Multinomial logit was used to calculate overall relative importance scores and latent class logit was used to estimate heterogeneous preference weights and to calculate the relative importance scores of the attributes for each latent class.ResultsA total of 140 patients were included for analyses. Overall relative importance scores showed differences in attribute importance rankings between a discrete choice experiment and BWS-2. Latent class analyses indicated three latent classes for both methods, with a specific class in both the discrete choice experiment and BWS-2 in which (avoiding) liver damage was the most important attribute. Ex-post analyses showed that classes differed in sex, age, level of education, and disease status. The discrete choice experiment was easier to understand compared with BWS-2.ConclusionsThis study showed that using a discrete choice experiment and BWS-2 leads to different outcomes, both in preference weights as well as in relative importance scores, which might have been caused by the different framing of risks in BWS-2. However, a latent class analysis revealed similar latent classes between methods. Careful consideration about method selection is required, while keeping the specific decision context in mind and pilot testing the methods.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin -- Allmänmedicin (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine -- General Practice (hsv//eng)
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
-
Patient
(Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)
Till lärosätets databas