SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/273314"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/273314" > “Just Carbon”: Idea...

“Just Carbon”: Ideas About Graphene Risks by Graphene Researchers and Innovation Advisors

Arvidsson, Rickard, 1984 (författare)
Chalmers tekniska högskola,Chalmers University of Technology
Boholm, Max, 1982 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
Johansson, Mikael, 1969 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
visa fler...
Lindh de Montoya, Monica, 1953 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Gothenburg Research Institute (GRI),University of Gothenburg
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-10-22
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: NanoEthics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1871-4757 .- 1871-4765. ; 12:3, s. 199-210
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • © 2018, The Author(s). Graphene is a nanomaterial with many promising and innovative applications, yet early studies indicate that graphene may pose risks to humans and the environment. According to ideas of responsible research and innovation, all relevant actors should strive to reduce risks related to technological innovations. Through semi-structured interviews, we investigated the idea of graphene as a risk (or not) held by two types of key actors: graphene researchers and innovation advisors at universities, where the latter are facilitating the movement of graphene from the laboratory to the marketplace. The most common idea found is that graphene is not a risk due to, e.g., low toxicity, low amounts produced/used, and its similarity to harmless materials (being “just carbon”). However, some researchers and advisors also say that graphene is a risk, e.g., under certain conditions or due to a lack of risk-related information. We explain the co-existence of these seemingly contradictory ideas through (1) the semantic ambiguity of the word risk and (2) a risk/no-risk rhetoric, where risks are mentioned rhetorically only to be disregarded as manageable or negligible. We suggest that some of the ideas held by the researchers and innovation advisors constitute a challenge to responsible research and innovation regarding graphene. At the same time, we acknowledge the dilemma that the discourse of responsible innovation creates for the actors: denying graphene risks makes them irresponsible due to a lack of risk awareness, while affirming graphene risks makes them irresponsible due to their everyday engagement in graphene development. We therefore recommend more research into what researchers and innovation advisors should do in practice in order to qualify as responsible.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences (hsv//eng)
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Nanoteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Nano-technology (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi -- Socialantropologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology -- Social Anthropology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

ELSA
Nanomaterial
Responsible research and innovation
Risk association
Safety
ELSA

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy