Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/93628" >
Triple Helix as a b...
Triple Helix as a basis for capacity building through innovation governance
-
- Szücs, Stefan, 1964 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för forskning om offentlig sektor (CEFOS),Statsvetenskapliga institutionen,Center for Public Sector Research (CEFOS),Department of Political Science,University of Gothenburg
-
- Marton, Susan, 1965 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för forskning om offentlig sektor (CEFOS),Center for Public Sector Research (CEFOS),University of Gothenburg
-
- Zaring, Olof, 1962 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutet för innovation och entreprenörskap,Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship,University of Gothenburg
-
visa fler...
-
- McKelvey, Maureen, 1965 (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutet för innovation och entreprenörskap,Institute for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
-
- McKelvey, Tomas, 1966 (författare)
- Göteborgs universitet,University of Gothenburg
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2009
- 2009
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Paper presented at the 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry & Government Linkages, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, 17-19 June, 2009.
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
-
visa fler...
-
https://research.cha...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Over the last decade, policy initiatives to promote innovativeness and growth, inspired by normative models of triple helix and capacity building, have proliferated. Theories of economic development offer several explanations of the emergence of clusters in particular environments. Most theorists would argue that specific, natural, economic, or institutional factors determine capacity building in terms of cluster development. Other theorists emphasize the role of local social networks and phases of regional knowledge-based triple helix spaces in explaining the emergence of such capacity building. Neither of these theoretical streams offers systematic explanations of differences in the emergence and success of capacity building, beyond finding that crucial resources are unevenly distributed. The theoretical linkage between triple helix and capacity building through innovation governance is unclear. We still do not have a relevant theory explaining the influence of innovation governance involving local government–industry–university relationships on capacity building leading to successful innovations. Therefore, we are making a proposal to further develop the triple helix theory by focusing on capacity building through different sequences of innovation governance in relation to values/norms of identity, networks and local-global relations.
Ämnesord
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Företagsekonomi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Economics and Business -- Business Administration (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Övrig annan samhällsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Other Social Sciences -- Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Statsvetenskap -- Studier av offentlig förvaltning (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Political Science -- Public Administration Studies (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- innovation governance
- sequences
- local-global relations
- networks
- norms
- identity
- networks
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- kon (ämneskategori)