Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:724cb01e-1aba-4ec0-9889-2db27807a965" >
Generalization in L...
Generalization in Legal Argumentation
-
- Zenker, Frank (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Teoretisk filosofi,Filosofiska institutionen,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Theoretical Philosophy,Department of Philosophy,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,Bogazici University,Warsaw University of Technology
-
- Dahlman, Christian (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Juridiska institutionen,Juridiska fakulteten,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Department of Law,Faculty of Law,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC),Lund University Research Groups
-
- Sikström, Sverker (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för psykologi,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Department of Psychology,Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC),Lund University Research Groups
-
visa fler...
-
- Wahlberg, Lena (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Juridiska institutionen,Juridiska fakulteten,Health Law,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC),Department of Law,Faculty of Law,Lund University Research Groups,Law, Evidence and Cognition (LEVIC)
-
- Sarwar, Farhan (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Institutionen för psykologi,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Department of Psychology,Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2019-11-16
- 2020
- Engelska 10 s.
-
Ingår i: Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. - : Informa UK Limited. - 2473-2850 .- 2473-2842. ; 20:1, s. 80-99
- Relaterad länk:
-
http://dx.doi.org/10... (free)
-
visa fler...
-
https://www.tandfonl...
-
https://lup.lub.lu.s...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- When interpreting a natural language argument that generalizes over a contextually relevant category, audiences are likely to activate the category prototype and transfer its characteristics onto category instances. A generalized argument can thus appear more (respectively less) persuasive than one mentioning a specific category instance, provided the argument’s claim is more (less) warranted for the prototype than for the instance (positive and negative prototype effect). To investigate this effect in legal contexts using mock-scenarios, professional and lay judges at Swedish courts evaluated the persuasiveness of arguments giving a generalized or a specific description of an eyewitness. The generalized version described the witness either as an alcohol-intoxicated person or as a child, while the specific version varied both the amount of alcohol consumed (two vs. five glasses of wine) and the child’s age (four vs. 12 years). To investigate the effect of legal expertise on argument selection, moreover, law and social science students evaluate the persuasiveness of both argument versions. Though we observed statistically significant prototype effects as well as expertise effects, results were mixed and sometimes ran counter to normative expectation.
Ämnesord
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Juridik -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Law -- Law (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Psykologi -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Psychology -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Argumentation
- decision-making
- evidence
- expertise effect
- generalization
- lay judge
- legal context
- persuasiveness
- professional judge
- prototype effect
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- art (ämneskategori)
- ref (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas