SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:8eac4870-ef1a-49f9-859e-6d89a46e3327"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:8eac4870-ef1a-49f9-859e-6d89a46e3327" > Justifying mega-pro...

Justifying mega-projects : An analysis of the Swedish high-speed rail project

Ronnle, Erik (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Företagsekonomiska institutionen,Ekonomihögskolan,Department of Business Administration,Lund University School of Economics and Management, LUSEM
 (creator_code:org_t)
ISBN 9789177539100
2019
Engelska 183 s.
Serie: Lund Studies in Economics and Management
  • Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Mega-projects are a growing phenomenon worldwide. More and more projects are started and they grow ever bigger in size. At the same time, there is overwhelming evidence that mega-projects tend to run late, overrun in terms of costs and fail to deliver the expected benefits. Paradoxically, more and more money is invested in projects that fail to deliver on their promises.This dissertation analyses how mega-projects are justified through a case study of the Swedish highspeed rail project and the National Negotiation on Housing and Infrastructure (Sverigeförhandlingen). The Swedish high-speed rail project is arguably the biggest project ever initiated in the country and fits the definition of a mega-project. It is planned to connect the three largest cities Stockholm, Gothenburg and Malmö with high-speed rail tracks at an estimated investment cost of 230 billion SEK (€23.1 billion). The project is highly controversial in the public debate. It impacts a large number of people and involves substantial financial commitment. Interestingly, it is also heavily unprofitable in cost-benefit analysis calculations. Based on these calculations, the project is unprofitable and should be cancelled. Still, the project has been allowed to continue by two consecutive governments. Analysing how this project isjustified makes it possible to address the wider issue of why mega-projects continue to hold such appeal among decision makers despite their track record.The dissertation finds that the Swedish high-speed rail project is being justified based on a combination of strategies: widening the scope, producing encouraging numbers, creating and mobilising stakeholders, and arguing using a policy narrative. It shows how the project leadership skilfully bypasses criticism from cost-benefit analysis and succeeds to gather support for the project despite the numbers.The research has been done at Lund University School of Economics and Management and K2 – the Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Företagsekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Business Administration (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

transport policy
decision making
cost-benefit analysis
narrative
mega-projects

Publikations- och innehållstyp

dok (ämneskategori)
vet (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Ronnle, Erik
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Ekonomi och näri ...
och Företagsekonomi
Delar i serien
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy