Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b0630fff-b3a7-432c-a099-a97dc9011d55" >
The interdisciplina...
-
Persson, JohannesLund University,Lunds universitet,Teoretisk filosofi,Filosofiska institutionen,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Vetenskap och Beprövad Erfarenhet (VBE),Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Theoretical Philosophy,Department of Philosophy,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,VBE,Lund University Research Groups
(författare)
The interdisciplinary decision problem : Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism in forestry
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2018
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
2018
-
9 s.
-
electronicrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:b0630fff-b3a7-432c-a099-a97dc9011d55
-
https://lup.lub.lu.se/record/b0630fff-b3a7-432c-a099-a97dc9011d55URI
-
https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10401-230340DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska &svenska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Anmärkningar
-
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration, or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches, Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism, to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected.
-
Interdisciplinary research in the fields of forestry and sustainability studies often encounters seemingly incompatible ontological assumptions deriving from natural and social sciences. The perceived incompatibilities might emerge from the epistemological and ontological claims of the theories or models directly employed in the interdisciplinary collaboration; or they might be created by other epistemological and ontological assumptions that these interdisciplinary researchers find no reason to question. In this paper we discuss the benefits and risks of two possible approaches - Popperian optimism and Kuhnian pessimism - to interdisciplinary knowledge integration where epistemological and ontological differences between the sciences involved can be expected.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Thorén, HenrikLund University,Lunds universitet,Teoretisk filosofi,Filosofiska institutionen,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,LUCSUS,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,Theoretical Philosophy,Department of Philosophy,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies),Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences(Swepub:lu)fil-hit
(författare)
-
Olsson, LennartLund University,Lunds universitet,LUCSUS,Samhällsvetenskapliga institutioner och centrumbildningar,Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten,LUCSUS (Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies),Departments of Administrative, Economic and Social Sciences,Faculty of Social Sciences(Swepub:lu)micl-lol
(författare)
-
Teoretisk filosofiFilosofiska institutionen
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Ecology and Society23:31708-3087
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas