SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:151100359"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:prod.swepub.kib.ki.se:151100359" > Efficacy and safety...

Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis

Cherian, JJ (författare)
Eerike, M (författare)
Bagepally, BS (författare)
visa fler...
Das, S (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
Panda, S (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-10-14
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Frontiers in pharmacology. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 1663-9812. ; 13, s. 1004308-
  • Forskningsöversikt (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective: This review was performed to compare the efficacy and safety among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib and those who received tocilizumab independently with placebo or the standard of care (SOC).Methods: Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of baricitinib or tocilizumab as compared to placebo or the SOC in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the 28-day mortality. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences were compared and pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. A two-staged exploratory network meta-analysis using a multivariate meta-analysis was also performed. All analyses were performed in Stata version 16.0. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of the generated evidence (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022323363).Results: Treatment with baricitinib [RR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50–0.94), p = 0.02, i2 = 64.86%] but not with tocilizumab [RR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–1.07), p = 0.19, i2 = 24.41%] led to a significant improvement in the 28-day mortality as compared to that with the SOC. Treatment with baricitinib or tocilizumab, both independently led to a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization [baricitinib: mean difference, −1.13 days (95% CI, −1.51 to −0.76), p < 0.001, i2 = 0.00%; tocilizumab: mean difference, −2.80 days (95% CI, −4.17 to −1.43), p < 0.001, i2 = 55.47%] and a significant improvement in the proportion of patients recovering clinically by day 28 [baricitinib: RR, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03–1.48), p = 0.02, i2 = 27.20%; tocilizumab: RR, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.12–1.78), p < 0.001, i2 = 34.59%] as compared to those with the SOC. From the safety point of view, both these drugs showed similar results. There were fewer patients who experienced any serious adverse event following treatment with barictinib and tocilizumab as compared to those following treatment with the SOC [baricitinib: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62–0.92), p = 0.01, i2 = 12.63%; tocilizumab: RR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72–1.01), p = 0.07, i2 = 0.00%].Conclusion: As baricitinib and tocilizumab are recommended interchangeably by various guidelines for the management of COVID-19, considering the better 28-day mortality data and other comparable efficacy and safety outcomes, baricitinib may be favored over tocilizumab considering its ease of administration, shorter half-life, and lower cost of treatment.

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Cherian, JJ
Eerike, M
Bagepally, BS
Das, S
Panda, S
Artiklar i publikationen
Frontiers in pha ...
Av lärosätet
Karolinska Institutet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy