1. |
- Dejmek, Annika, et al.
(author)
-
Preparation of DNA From Cytological Material Effects of Fixation, Staining, and Mounting Medium on DNA Yield and Quality
- 2013
-
In: Cancer Cytopathology. - : Wiley. - 1934-662X .- 1934-6638. ; 121:7, s. 344-353
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Personalized oncology requires molecular analysis of tumor cells. Several studies have demonstrated that cytological material is suitable for DNA analysis, but to the authors' knowledge there are no systematic studies comparing how the yield and quality of extracted DNA is affected by the various techniques used for the preparation of cytological material. METHODS: DNA yield and quality were compared using cultured human lung cancer cells subjected to different preparation techniques used in routine cytology, including fixation, mounting medium, and staining. The results were compared with the outcome of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genotyping of 66 clinical cytological samples using the same DNA preparation protocol. RESULTS: All tested protocol combinations resulted in fragment lengths of at least 388 base pairs. The mounting agent EcoMount resulted in higher yields than traditional xylene-based medium. Spray and ethanol fixation resulted in both a higher yield and better DNA quality than air drying. In liquid-based cytology (LBC) methods, CytoLyt solution resulted in a 5-fold higher yield than CytoRich Red. Papanicolaou staining provided twice the yield of hematoxylin and eosin staining in both liquid-based preparations. Genotyping outcome and quality control values from the clinical EGFR genotyping demonstrated a sufficient amount and amplifiability of DNA in both spray-fixed and air-dried cytological samples. CONCLUSIONS: Reliable clinical genotyping can be performed using all tested methods. However, in the cell line experiments, spray-or ethanol-fixed, Papanicolaou-stained slides provided the best results in terms of yield and fragment length. In LBC, the DNA recovery efficiency of the preserving medium may differ considerably, which should be taken into consideration when introducing LBC.
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Kholova, Ivana, et al.
(author)
-
Inter- and intraobserver agreement in whole-slide digital ThinPrep samples of low-grade squamous lesions of the cervix uteri with known high-risk HPV status : A multicentric international study
- 2022
-
In: Cancer Cytopathology. - : Wiley. - 1934-662X .- 1934-6638. ; 130:12, s. 939-948
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background High-risk human papilloma virus (HR HPV) testing and liquid-based cytology are used for primary cervical screening. Digital cytology, based on whole-slide scanned samples, is a promising technique for teaching and diagnostic purposes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver variation in low-grade squamous lesions, HR HPV status bias, and the use of whole-slide scanned digital cervical cytology slides. Methods Fifteen expert cytopathologists evaluated 71 digitalized ThinPrep slides (31 atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASC-US], 21 negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, and 19 low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cases). HR HPV data were accessible only in the second round. Results In interobserver analysis, Kendalls coefficient of concordance was 0.52 in the first round and 0.58 in the second round. Fleiss kappa values were 0.29 in the first round and 0.31 in the second round. In the ASC-US category, Fleiss kappa increased from 0.19 to 0.22 in the second round and the increase was even higher expressed by Kendalls coefficient: from 0.42 to 0.52. In intraobserver analysis, personal scores were higher in the second round. Conclusions The interobserver and intraobserver variability in low-grade squamous lesions was within fair agreement values in the present study, in line with previous works. The comparison of two rounds showed that expert cytopathologists are generally unbiased by the knowledge of HR HPV data, but that being informed of the HR HPV status leads to a better agreement. Stain quality and back discomfort were highlighted as factors affecting digital cytopathology use.
|
|
4. |
- Mansour, Mohammed S.I., et al.
(author)
-
Determination of PD-L1 expression in effusions from mesothelioma by immuno-cytochemical staining
- 2017
-
In: Cancer Cytopathology. - : Wiley. - 1934-662X .- 1934-6638. ; 125:12, s. 908-917
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUNDMalignant mesothelioma (MM) is an aggressive, fatal tumor. Current therapeutic options only marginally improve survival. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a dominant mediator of immunosuppression, binding to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1). PD-L1 is up-regulated in cancer cells, and the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway plays a critical role in tumor immune evasion, thus providing a target for antitumor therapy. Further, a correlation between PD-L1 expression and prognosis has been reported. Studies performed on histological material have revealed expression of PD-L1 in MM, but no study has been performed on MM effusions thus far. METHODSPD-L1 expression was determined by a commercially available antibody (clone 28-8) in 74 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks from body effusions obtained at diagnosis from patients with MM. The presence of MM cells was confirmed with CK5/6, calretinin, and EMA and the admixture of macrophages was assessed with CD68. Only cases containing more than 100 tumor cells were assessed. Membranous staining in tumor cells was considered positive. Survival time was calculated from the appearance of the first malignant effusion until death. RESULTSReactivity was observed in 23 of 61 (38%) of cases and was classified as 1%-5% (n = 9 cases), >5%-10% (n = 4 cases), >10%-50% (n = 4 cases), and >50% (n = 6 cases) positive cells. Survival times did not differ significantly between patients with PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONMM effusions are suitable for immune-cytochemical assessment of PD-L1 expression in malignant cells and the results are similar to those reported for histological specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2017;125:908-17. (c) 2017 American Cancer Society. We studied the PD-L1 reactivity of tumor cells in 74 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cell blocks from body effusions obtained at diagnosis from 74 patients with malignant mesothelioma. In 61 cases, the PD-L1 reactivity could be soundly determined, and the number of positive cases agrees with the outcomes of other studies performed on histological material, suggesting the determination of PD-L1 status in effusions as an early and convenient alternative.
|
|
5. |
- Mansour, Mohammed S I, et al.
(author)
-
Higher concordance of PD-L1 expression between biopsies and effusions in epithelioid than in nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma
- 2021
-
In: Cancer Cytopathology. - : Wiley. - 1934-6638 .- 1934-662X. ; 129:6, s. 468-478
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Malignant mesothelioma (MM) is a therapy-resistant tumor, often causing an effusion. Drugs targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) pathway have shown promising results, but assessment of PD-L1 expression to select patients for therapy has mainly been performed on histologic tissue samples. In a previous study, we showed that MM effusions are suitable for PD-L1 assessment with results comparable to those reported in histologic studies, but no studies have compared PD-L1 expression in histologic and cytologic samples.METHODS: PD-L1 expression was determined immunohistochemically (clone 28-8) in 61 paired samples of effusions and biopsies from patients with pleural MM, obtained at the time of diagnosis. Only cases with >100 tumor cells were included. Membranous staining in tumor cells was considered positive at ≥1%, >5%, >10%, and >50% cutoff levels.RESULTS: Of 61 histologic samples, PD-L1 expression was found in 28 and 7 samples at ≥1% and >50% cutoffs, respectively; the corresponding figures for cytology were 21 and 5, respectively. The overall percentage agreement between histology and cytology was 69% and 84%, with a kappa (κ) of 0.36 and 0.08 at ≥1% and >50% cutoffs, respectively. The concordance between cytology and histology tended to be higher for epithelioid MM versus nonepithelioid MM at a ≥1% cutoff. PD-L1 positivity in biopsies, but not in effusions, correlated with the histologic subtype at a ≥1% cutoff.CONCLUSIONS: A moderate concordance of PD-L1 expression between biopsies and effusions from pleural MM, especially for the epithelioid subtype, indicates biological differences between the 2 types of specimens. Cytology and histology may be complementary.
|
|
6. |
- Mansour, Mohammed S. I., et al.
(author)
-
The impact of different fixatives on immunostaining of lung adenocarcinomas in pleural effusion cell blocks
- 2024
-
In: CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY. - 1934-662X .- 1934-6638.
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Cell blocks (CBs) are widely used for biomarker analyses such as immunostaining. Although immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues is standardized, there are multiple preparation methods and fixatives for cytology. Our objective was to investigate the effect of different common fixatives on the immunoreactivity of pleural effusion CBs with metastatic lung adenocarcinomas. Methods: This prospective study included 24 malignant pleural effusions from different patients with lung adenocarcinoma. From each case, four identical CBs were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, PreservCyt, CytoLyt, and CytoRich Red (only 17 of the cases), respectively. Samples containing <100 malignant cells were excluded. All CBs were stained with thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1; clones 8G7G3/1 and SPT24), napsin A, claudin 4, CEA, CK7, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; clones BS14, Ber-Ep4, and MOC-31). The fraction and intensity of stained cells were evaluated. Results: Of the investigated markers, a significant difference in staining proportion was seen for TTF-1 clone 8G7G3/1 and EpCAM clone MOC-31, especially with cases being negative in CytoLyt (33.3% and 83.3% positive, respectively) and PreservCyt (62.5% and 83.3%) whereas being positive in CytoRich Red (76.5% and 94.1%) and formalin (both 95.8%). A significantly weaker intensity of staining was seen for all alcohol-based fixatives compared to formalin for TTF-1 clone 8G7G3/1, napsin A, and EpCAM clone MOC-31, whereas EpCAM clone Ber-Ep4 was significantly weaker only in PreservCyt compared with formalin. Conclusions: Immunocytochemical expression and concordance with formalin-fixed CBs differ depending on the used fixative as well as the antibody and clone, warranting investigation of the reliability of each biomarker for non-formalin-fixed cytology.
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|