| 1. |
- Damas, J, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence of HIV, Hepatitis C and its related risk behaviours among women who inject drugs in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal: a cross-sectional study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 8, s. 20499361211062107-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- People who inject drugs (PWID) are at great risk of HIV and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). In order to properly design interventions and develop programmes for women who inject drugs, this study assessed the prevalence of HIV, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C, and syphilis and its risk behaviours among women who inject drugs in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Methods: Through modified network sampling in three districts in the Kathmandu Valley, Nepal, this cross-sectional study enrolled a total of 160 women who inject drugs. Participants’ serum samples were tested for HIV, HCV, Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and syphilis and risk behaviours were assessed through a structured questionnaire. Primary outcome variables were HIV, HCV, HBV and syphilis prevalence, and secondary outcome variables were sharing needles in the past month and using condom in last sexual intercourse. Stepwise logistic regression was used to determine micro- and macroenvironmental factors associated with secondary outcomes. Results: The prevalence of HIV, HCV, and HBV was 8.8%, 21.3%, and 1.9%, respectively. HIV-HCV co-infection rate was 5.6%. Fifteen percent of women who inject drugs reported transactional sex for drugs or money. One in four women who inject drugs (27.5%) reported that they were imprisoned or detained for drug related reasons. In multivariable analysis, women living with HIV who inject drugs were almost four times more likely to use a previously used needle/syringe than women who inject drugs who were HIV negative (aOR: 4.2 CI: 1.1-15.9, p = 0.03), but were almost four times more likely to use a condom during sexual intercourse (aOR: 3.5 CI: 1.1-28.9, p = 0.03). Enrolment in family planning was the main determinant for using condoms in last sexual intercourse (aOR 4.9 CI: 1.6-16.7, p = 0.006). Participants with access to HIV test and counselling (HTC) services were less likely to share needles (aOR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1–0.8, p = 0.01). Conclusion: Prevalence of HIV and HCV is high among women who inject drugs in Kathmandu valley of Nepal. Women who inject drugs enrolled in national programmes such as family planning and HTC were positively associated with condom use, and less likely to share needles.
|
|
| 2. |
- Dang, LVP, et al.
(författare)
-
Molecular genotypes of gag sequences in HIV-1 infected children treated with antiretroviral therapy in Vietnam
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 7, s. 2049936120958536-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Gag protein of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been reported to play a crucial role in establishing infection, viral replication, and disease progression; thus, gag might be related to treatment response. The objective of this study was to investigate molecular genotypes of the gag gene, particularly the important functional binding domains in relation to treatment outcomes. Methods: HIV-infected children enrolled and treated at Vietnam National Children’s Hospital were recruited in the study. A total of 25 gag sequences were generated and used to construct phylogenetic trees and aligned with a reference sequence comparing 17 functional domains. Results: We found that all patients in a treatment failure (TF) group belonged to one cluster of the phylogenetic tree. In addition, the rate of mutations was significantly higher in TF compared with a treatment success (TS) group, specifically the PIP2 recognition motif, and the nucleocapsid basic and zinc motif 2 domains [median and (interquartile range (IQR): 12.5 (6.25–12.5) versus 50 (25–50), p < 0.01; 0 (0–0) versus 0 (0–21.43), p = 0.03 and 0 (0–7.14) versus 7.14 (7.14–7.14), p = 0.04, respectively]. When analyzing gag sequences at different time points in seven patients, we did not observe a consistent mutation pattern related to treatment response. Conclusion: Gag mutations in certain domains might be associated with increased viral load; therefore, studying the molecular genotype of the gag gene might be beneficial in monitoring treatment response in HIV-infected children.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hannula, R, et al.
(författare)
-
Hepatitis C outreach project and cross-sectional epidemiology in high-risk populations in Trondheim, Norway
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 8, s. 20499361211053929-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Hepatitis C is highly prevalent among people who use drugs (PWUD), and the hepatitis C virus (HCV) epidemic is less characterised in Norway. The aims of the study were to assess the prevalence and treatment willingness in high-risk populations by reaching out to frequently visited sites for high-risk populations. Methods: Individuals from high-risk populations were included from September 2015 to March 2017. Two dedicated study nurses frequently visited the local opioid substitution clinic, outpatient clinics, PWUD day centres, local prison, and refugee centre in Trondheim, Norway. Demographic data, risk behaviour, and clinical symptoms were obtained by study questionnaire. Subjects with anti-HCV+ rapid test were subsequently tested for HCV RNA and genotyped. Viraemic patients were offered referral for HCV treatment evaluation. Results: A total of 381 participants were included in the study: 52 immigrants, 62 prisoners, and 267 PWUD. The anti-HCV prevalence rates were 0% ( n = 0) in immigrants, 40% ( n = 25) in prisoners, and 61% ( n = 164) in PWUD, with 24% ( n = 15) of prisoners and 42% ( n = 108) of PWUD being viraemic. Of those qualifying for treatment ( n = 31), 30 wished to be evaluated. Conclusion: This study showed high HCV prevalence in prisoners and PWUD and that infected high-risk patients were interested in treatment evaluation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Karawajczyk, Malgorzata, et al.
(författare)
-
High expression of neutrophil and monocyte CD64 with simultaneous lack of upregulation of adhesion receptors CD11b, CD162, CD15, CD65 on neutrophils in severe COVID-19
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. - : Sage Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Aims: The pronounced neutrophilia observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections suggests a role for these leukocytes in the pathology of the disease. Monocyte and neutrophil expression of CD64 and CD11b have been reported as early biomarkers to detect infections. The aim of this study was to study the expression of receptors for IgG (CD64) and adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD15s, CD65, CD162, CD66b) on neutrophils and monocytes in patients with severe COVID-19 after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: The expression of receptors was analyzed using flow cytometry. EDTA blood from 23 patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection was sampled within 48 h of admission to the ICU. Leukocytes were labeled with antibodies to CD11b, CD15s, CD65s, CD162, CD64, and CD66b. Expression of receptors was reported as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) or the percentage of cells expressing receptors.Results: Results are presented as comparison of COVID-19 patients with the healthy group and the receptor expression as MFI. Neutrophil receptors CD64 (2.5 versus 0.5) and CD66b (44.5 versus 34) were increased and CD15 decreased (21.6 versus 28.3) when CD65 (6.6 versus 4.4), CD162 (21.3 versus 21.1) and CD11b (10.5 versus 12) were in the same range. Monocytes receptors CD64 (30.5 versus 16.6), CD11b (18.7 versus 9.8), and CD162 (38.6 versus 36.5) were increased and CD15 decreased (10.3 versus 17.9); CD65 were in the same range (2.3 versus 1.96).Conclusion: Monocytes and neutrophils are activated during severe COVID-19 infection as shown by strong upregulation of CD64. High monocyte and neutrophil CD64 can be an indicator of a severe form of COVID19. The adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD162, CD65, and CD15) are not upregulated on otherwise activated neutrophils, which might lead to relative impairment of tissue migration. Low adhesion profile of neutrophils suggests immune dysfunction of neutrophils. Monocytes maintain upregulation of some adhesion molecules (CD11b, CD162) suggesting the persistence of an increased ability to migrate into tissues, even during a severe stage of COVID-19. Future research should focus on CD64 and CD11b kinetics in the context of prognosis.
|
|
| 5. |
- Resman, Fredrik
(författare)
-
Antimicrobial stewardship programs; a two-part narrative review of step-wise design and issues of controversy Part I : step-wise design of an antimicrobial stewardship program
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 7
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Regardless of one’s opinion of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), it is hardly possible to work in hospital care and not be exposed to the term or its practical effects. Despite the term being relatively new, the number of publications in the field is vast, including several excellent reviews of general and specific aspects. Work in antimicrobial stewardship is complex, and includes not only aspects of infectious disease and microbiology, but also of epidemiology, genetics, behavioural psychology, systems science, economics and ethics, to name a few. This review aims to take several of these aspects and the scientific evidence of antimicrobial stewardship studies and merge them into two questions: How should we design ASPs based on what we know today? And which are the most essential unanswered questions regarding antimicrobial stewardship on a broader scale? This narrative review is written in two separate parts aiming to provide answers to the two questions. This first part is written as a step-wise approach to designing a stewardship intervention based on the pillars of unmet need, feasibility, scientific evidence and necessary core elements. It is written mainly as a guide to someone new to the field. It is sorted into five distinct steps: (a) focusing on designing aims; (b) assessing performance and local barriers to rational antimicrobial use; (c) deciding on intervention technique; (d) practical, tailored design including core element inclusion; and (e) evaluation and sustainability. The second part, published separately, formulates ten critical questions on controversies in the field of antimicrobial stewardship. It is aimed at clinicians and researchers with stewardship experience and strives to promote discussion, not to provide answers.
|
|
| 6. |
- Resman, Fredrik
(författare)
-
Antimicrobial stewardship programs; a two-part narrative review of step-wise design and issues of controversy. Part II : Ten questions reflecting knowledge gaps and issues of controversy in the field of antimicrobial stewardship
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease. - : SAGE Publications. - 2049-9361 .- 2049-937X. ; 7
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Regardless of one’s opinion on antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), it is hardly possible to work in hospital care and not be exposed to the term or its practical effects. Despite the term being relatively new, the number of publications in the field is vast, including several excellent reviews of general and specific aspects. Work in antimicrobial stewardship is complex, and include aspects not only of infectious disease and microbiology, but also of epidemiology, genetics, behavioural psychology, systems science, economics and ethics, to name but a few. This review aims to take several of these aspects and the scientific evidence from antimicrobial stewardship studies and merge them into two questions: How should we design ASPs based on what we know today? and Which are the most essential unanswered questions regarding antimicrobial stewardship on a broader scale? This narrative review is written in two separate parts aiming to provide answers to the two questions. The first part, published separately, is written as a step-wise approach to designing a stewardship intervention based on the pillars of unmet need, feasibility, scientific evidence and necessary core elements. It is written mainly as a guide to someone new to the field. It is sorted into five distinct steps; (a) focusing on designing aims; (b) assessing performance and local barriers to rational antimicrobial use; (c) deciding on intervention technique; (d) practical, tailored design including core element inclusion; and (e) evaluation and sustainability. This second part formulates 10 critical questions on controversies in the field of antimicrobial stewardship. It is aimed at clinicians and researchers with stewardship experience and strives to promote discussion, not to provide answers.
|
|
