| 1. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, et al.
(author)
-
Innovation och samverkan för förbättrad välfärd
- 2022
-
In: Den (ut)forskande staden : En FoU-innovation i offentlig sektor - En FoU-innovation i offentlig sektor. - 9789198600919 - 9789198600926 ; , s. 17-30
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Inledningskapitel till forskningsantologin "De (ut)forskande staden - En FoU-innovation i offentlig sektor" med fokus på hur innovation i offentlig sektor förhåller sig till begreppet livskvalitet och hur medborgarinvolvering och sektorsövergripande arbete kan påverka kvaliteten i offentlig sektor.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergman, Anna-Karin, et al.
(author)
-
Den (ut)forskande staden - Lärdomar
- 2022
-
In: Den (ut)forskande staden : En FoU-innovation i offentlig sektor - En FoU-innovation i offentlig sektor. - 9789198600919 - 9789198600926 ; , s. 271-281
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 3. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, et al.
(author)
-
Campus Helsingborg ger perspektiv
- 2020
-
In: 1666. 1999. 2000. 2020. Campus Helsingborg 20 år.. - 9789151970912 ; , s. 205-211
-
Book chapter (pop. science, debate, etc.)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Adenskog, Magnus
(author)
-
96,4 procent - och vad som hände med folkstyret
- 2022
-
In: Helsingborgs Dagblad. - 1103-9388.
-
Journal article (pop. science, debate, etc.)abstract
- Del 1 av 3 i artikelserie för Helsingborgs Dagblad om den lokala demokratin i Helsingborg inför kommunalvalet 2022.
|
|
| 6. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, 1985-
(author)
-
After the Equilibrium : Democratic Innovations and Long-term Institutional Development in the City of Reykjavik
- 2018
-
In: Analyse & Kritik. Zeitung für linke Debatte und Praxis. - : Lucius und Lucius Verlagsgesellschaft. - 0171-5860 .- 2365-9858. ; 40:1, s. 31-53
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Although democratic innovations (DIs) are spread all over the world, there is little research on the institutional outcomes of implementing such innovations in governmental organisations. To remedy this, it is important to focus on cases where DIs have been implemented and formally connected to the policymaking process over a longer period. Reykjavik provides such a case. Drawing on observations and interviews with key stakeholders over a period of three years, this study analyses how the institutional logic of DIs influenced the local government in Reykjavik. The study presents two conclusions: First, it is clear that one equilibrium (representative democracy) has not been replaced by another (participatory democracy). Second, there is no peaceful co-existence between the two, but instead the outcome is an organisation in ‘a state of flux’. There are several factors contributing to this outcome, but three stand out: a populist power-shift, dissatisfaction with theworking of the implemented DIs and deliberative ambiguity. In the final part of the article, the institutional outcome is discussed in relation to overall consequences for the political system.
|
|
| 7. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, 1985-, et al.
(author)
-
Balancing Potential and Risk : The Living Lab Approach in Mobile Participation Research
- 2017
-
In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. - Cham : Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. - 0302-9743 .- 1611-3349. ; :10429, s. 12-23
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Living labs as a research approach have been said to hold many promises regarding the evaluation of state-of-the art technologies in real-world contexts, for instance by allowing close cooperation with various stakeholders. At the same time, a living lab approach is connected with substantial complexity and increased risk. This paper elaborates on a conducted living lab with the objective to explore challenges and opportunities of mobile participation. For this purpose, a novel mobile application enabling interaction between citizens and city authorities was tested over a period of five months in Turku, Finland. In this paper, we describe identified risks associated with a living lab approach to mobile participation research. We conclude with an overall evaluation regarding the appropriateness of the living lab approach within the e-participation research field and provide recommendations on how to balance potential and risk in future projects.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, 1985-
(author)
-
Democratic innovations in political systems : towards a systemic approach
- 2018
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- There are many indicators that the representative democratic system is currently facing serious legitimacy challenges. Two central indicators of these challenges are changing patterns of political participation and a decline in system support. Against this backdrop, a growing number of governments claim that democratic innovations (DIs) could reconnect institutions with citizens. This thesis focuses on online DIs implemented in real political contexts, and the overarching aim of the thesis is to contribute to the emergent empirical scholarship on how DIs can influence political systems. In the last two decades, most empirical studies in the field have analysed DIs at the micro level.This thesis takes a different stance by posing system-related research questions to the implementation of DIs and, by doing so, showing how DIs are interrelated with, rather than isolated from, the political system and that DIs can influence political systems. The thesis consists of one literature review and three empirical case studies, applying a multiple methodological approach. Its novelty lies in three main empirical findings that contribute to the development of the field. First, it shows that participation in DIs can influence citizens’ perceived trust towards local political institutions. In addition, the results suggest that predispositions and prior engagement mediate the direction of change in trust amongst citizens. Secondly, the results show that DIs can perform different political functions, such as facilitating spaces for citizens to provide original ideas and deliberation, while also having an agenda-setting function. Thirdly, the result suggest that long-term institutional change is complex and that the implementation of DIs can create a situation in which civil servants and politicians perceive their organisation to be in some ‘state of flux’, as they are torn between two competing institutional logics. In conclusion, this thesis should be understood as a piece in a broader movement that works towards a systemic approach to the study of DIs, and that by showing these empirical findings, the thesis contributes to deepening our understanding of what influences and functions DIs can have in political systems.
|
|
| 10. |
- Adenskog, Magnus, et al.
(author)
-
Developing general guidelines and tools for documenting merits from external engagement - A practical approach
- 2022
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The Swedish higher education sector is in a phase in which the importance of external engagement for quality in research and education at universities has gradually become clearer. This development is also visible at European as well as global level. It is therefore relevant to assess and value the work that takes place at universities within the framework of external engagement and to support a diversification of academic competencies and careers. The work presented has to a large extent taken place within the national project “MerSam-Meritvärde av samverkansskicklighet” (https://www.hb.se/en/collaboration/mersam/ ) involving 14 Swedish universities, during 2019-2020. The overall objective of the project has been to develop knowledge, policy and practice for assessment of merits from external engagement with the long-term objective to develop a common understanding and framework on a national level. The project method has been exploratory combining both individual and organisational perspectives in order to develop good practice and to stimulate a national dialogue on the need of a more structured and harmonised approach when assessing merits from external engagement. One of the project objectives was to develop and piloting a practical guide for academic staff on how to document and assess merits from external engagement using a flexible yet a systematic and structured approach. The guide includes tools that supports the identification of a diverse set of competencies related to external engagement, dissemination, innovation in relation to the task of collaboration as stated in the Swedish Higher Education Act as well as activities in research and education. Any national initiative needs however to harmonise with a global academic context. The guidelines and tools developed in this work are anticipated to be in line with and relevant for initiatives taking place within open science on the international arena.
|
|
