| 1. |
- Amer, Ahmed, 1984-
(author)
-
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of two questionnaires for the assessment of occupational performance in children with disability : Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) and Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)
- 2021
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Globally, 93–150 million children live with some form of disability, most of them live in developing countries. Occupational performance describes a person’s ability to execute tasks that are meaningful, in the context in which the person lives. The Children’s Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) are measurement tools developed to measure different aspects of occupational performance. However, before using these tools in another cultural context, evidence of validity in that context should be established.The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate the evidence of validity for CHEQ and the Uganda version of PEDI (PEDI-UG).Study I established the validity of revised CHEQ 1.0 for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP). The study suggested improvements and inclusion of younger children. This led to the development of CHEQ 2.0, which was culturally adapted and validated for Jordan in Study II. Study III indicated that PEDI-UG had good psychometric properties when tested on typically developing children, and it suggested improvements and further analysis in children with disability. Therefore, study IV investigated the psychometric properties on Ugandan children with CP and confirmed the instrument’s validity. However, the differential item functioning analysis comparing children with CP and typically developing children, and the developmental trajectories for both groups, suggested that a separate conversion table should be used to transform the total sum score from raw scores to a 0–100 scaled score. This thesis shows the importance of cultural adaptations and psychometric validation of measurement tools before they can be used in new cultural contexts. The Arabic CHEQ 2.0and PEDI-UG can be used in the evaluation of rehabilitation interventions and will help to fill the need for measurement tools in these countries.
|
|
| 2. |
- Amer, Ahmed, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
Cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the Arabic version of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ)
- 2022
-
In: Hong Kong Journal of Occupational Therapy. - : Elsevier. - 1569-1861 .- 1876-4398. ; 35:1, s. 84-95
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Validated outcome measures are essential for assessment and treatment of children with disabilities. The Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) was developed and validated for use in Western countries for children with unilateral hand dysfunction. This study aimed to perform a cross-cultural adaptation and investigate reliability for the Arabic CHEQ.Methods: Translation and cross-cultural adaptation were performed in four phases: (i) forward-translation and reconciliation with feedback from parents and typically developing children from Jordan (n = 14); (ii) backward-translation and review; (iii) cognitive debriefing with parents and/or their children with unilateral hand dysfunction (n = 17); and (iv) review and proofreading. In the psychometric analyses, 161 children from Jordan (mean age [SD] 10y 8 m [5y 8 m]; 88 males) participated. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha. Test-retest reliability was evaluated in 39 children with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and weighted kappa (kappa).Results: Synonyms of four words were added to accommodate for different Arabic dialects. On average, 93% of children with unilateral hand dysfunction and their parents understood the CHEQ items. One response alternative, 'Get help', to the opening question was unclear for 70% of the respondents and need further explanation. Two items about using a knife and fork were difficult to comprehend and culturally irrelevant. High internal consistency was demonstrated (Cronbach's alphas 0.94- 0.97) and moderate to excellent ICC (0.77-0.93). For 18 individual items, kappa indicated poor to good agreement (kappa between 0.28 and 0.66).Conclusions: After the suggested minor adjustments, the Arabic CHEQ will be comprehensible, culturally relevant and reliable for assessing children with unilateral hand dysfunction in Jordan.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Amer, Ahmed, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
The effect of insoles on foot pain and daily activities
- 2014
-
In: Prosthetics and Orthotics International. - : Sage Publications. - 0309-3646 .- 1746-1553. ; 38:6, s. 474-480
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- BACKGROUND:Foot pain decreases individuals' ability to perform daily activities. Insoles are often prescribed to reduce the pain which, in turn, may promote return to normal activities.OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the effects of insoles on foot pain and daily activities, and to investigate the relationship between individuals' satisfaction with insoles and actual use of them.STUDY DESIGN:A 4-week pre-post intervention follow-up.METHODS:Brief Pain Inventory, International Physical Activity Questionnaire and Lower Extremities Functional Status were used as outcome measures. Client Satisfaction with Device was used in the follow-up.RESULTS:A total of 67 participants answered the questionnaires (81% women). Overall, a reduction in Pain Severity (p = 0.002) and Pain Interference (p = 0.008) was shown. Secondary analyses revealed a significant effect only in women. No changes in daily activities (Walking, p = 0.867; Total Physical Activity, p = 0.842; Lower Extremities Functional Status, p = 0.939) could be seen. There was no relation between Client Satisfaction with Device measures and duration of insole use. A difference in sex was shown; women scored higher than men on Pain Severity.CONCLUSION:Insoles reduce pain and pain interference with daily activities for women with foot pain. Satisfaction with the insoles is not a predictor of actual insole use. The effect of insoles on activity performance needs further study.CLINICAL RELEVANCE:This study provides evidence for prescribing insoles to people with foot pain. Nonetheless, insoles are not enough to increase their physical activity level in the short term. Satisfaction with insoles and duration of use are not correlated and cannot be inferred from each other.
|
|
| 5. |
- Amer, Ahmed, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
The Ugandan version of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-UG). Part II : Psychometric properties
- 2018
-
In: Child Care Health and Development. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0305-1862 .- 1365-2214. ; 44:4, s. 562-571
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) has been recommended as a gold standard in paediatric rehabilitation. A Ugandan version of PEDI (PEDI-UG) has been developed by culturally adapting and translating the original PEDI. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the PEDI-UG in Ugandan children by testing the instrument's rating scale functioning, internal structure, and test-retest reliability.Methods: Two hundred forty-nine Ugandan children (125 girls) aged 6 months to 7.5 years (Mean = 3.4, SD = 1.9) with typical development were tested using the PEDI-UG. Forty-nine children were tested twice to assess test-retest reliability. Validity was investigated by Rasch analysis and reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient.Results: The PEDI-UG domains showed good unidimensionality based on principal component analysis of residuals. Most activities (95%) showed acceptable fit to the Rasch model. Six misfit items were deleted from the Functional Skills scales and one from the Caregiver Assistance scales. The category steps on the Caregiver Assistance scales' rating scale were reversed but functioned well when changed from a 6-point to 4-point rating scale. The reliability was excellent; intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.87-0.92 for the domains of the Functional Skills scales and 0.86-0.88 for the domains of the Caregiver Assistance scales.Conclusion: The PEDI-UG has good to excellent psychometric properties and provides a valid measure of the functional performance of typically developing children from the age of 6 months to 7.5 years in Uganda. Further analysis of all items, including misfit and deleted items, in children with functional disability is recommended.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Amer, Ahmed, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
Validity and test-retest reliability of Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire in children with unilateral cerebral palsy
- 2016
-
In: Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0012-1622 .- 1469-8749. ; 58:7, s. 743-749
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim: To investigate the validity of the internet-based version of the Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) by testing the new four-category rating scale, internal structure, and test-retest reliability.Method: Data were collected for 242 children with unilateral cerebral palsy (CP) (137 males and 105 females; mean age 9y 10mo, SD 3y 5mo, range 6-18y). Twenty children from the study sample (mean age 11y 8mo, SD 3y 10mo) participated in a retest within 7 to 14 days. Validity was tested by Rasch analysis based on a rating scale model and test-retest reliability by Kappa analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).Results: The four-category rating scale was within recommended criteria for rating scale structure. One item was removed because of misfit. CHEQ showed good scale structure according to the criteria. The effective operational range was >90% for two of the CHEQ scales. Test-retest reliability for the three CHEQ scales was: grasp efficacy, ICC=0.91; time taken, ICC=0.88; and feeling bothered, ICC=0.91.Interpretation: The internet-based CHEQ with a four-category rating scale is valid and reliable for use in children with unilateral CP. Further studies are needed to investigate the validity of the internet-based version of CHEQ for children with upper limb reduction deficiency or obstetric brachial plexus palsy and the validity of the recommended improvements to the current version.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Svanborg, Cecilia, et al.
(author)
-
Evidence for validity of the Swedish self-rated 36-item version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in patients with mental disorders : a multi-centre cross-sectional study using Rasch analysis
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. - : Springer Nature. - 2509-8020. ; 6:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is a generic instrument for the assessment of functioning in six domains, resulting in a total health-related disability score. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the Swedish-language version of the self-rated 36-item version in psychiatric outpatients with various common psychiatric diagnoses using Rasch analysis. A secondary aim was to explore the correlation between two methods of calculating overall scores to guide clinical practice: the WHODAS simple (summative) model and the WHODAS complex (weighted) model. Methods Cross-sectional data from 780 Swedish patients with various mental disorders were evaluated by Rasch analysis according to the partial credit model. Bivariate Pearson correlations between the two methods of calculating overall scores were explored. Results Of the 36 items, 97% (35 items) were within the recommended range of infit mean square; only item D4.5 (Sexual activities) indicated misfit (infit mean square 1.54 logits). Rating scale analysis showed a short distance between severity levels and disordered thresholds. The two methods of calculating overall scores were highly correlated (0.89-0.99). Conclusions The self-administered WHODAS 2.0 fulfilled several aspects of validity according to Rasch analysis and has the potential to be a useful tool for the assessment of functioning in psychiatric outpatients. The internal structure of the instrument was satisfactorily valid and reliable at the level of the total score but demonstrated problems at the domain level. We suggest rephrasing the item Sexual activities and revising the rating scale categories. The WHODAS simple model is easier to use in clinical practice and our results indicate that it can differentiate function among patients with moderate psychiatric disability, whereas Rasch scaled scores are psychometrically more precise even at low disability levels. Further investigations of different scoring models are warranted.
|
|
