| 1. |
- Babrak, Lmar, et al.
(author)
-
Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire (AIRR) Community Guide to TR and IG Gene Annotation
- 2022
-
In: Immunogenetics : Methods and Protocols - Methods and Protocols. - New York, NY : Springer US. - 1064-3745. - 9781071621141 - 9781071621158 ; 2453, s. 279-296
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)abstract
- High-throughput sequencing of adaptive immune receptor repertoires (AIRR, i.e., IG and TR) has revolutionized the ability to carry out large-scale experiments to study the adaptive immune response. Since the method was first introduced in 2009, AIRR sequencing (AIRR-Seq) has been applied to survey the immune state of individuals, identify antigen-specific or immune-state-associated signatures of immune responses, study the development of the antibody immune response, and guide the development of vaccines and antibody therapies. Recent advancements in the technology include sequencing at the single-cell level and in parallel with gene expression, which allows the introduction of multi-omics approaches to understand in detail the adaptive immune response. Analyzing AIRR-seq data can prove challenging even with high-quality sequencing, in part due to the many steps involved and the need to parameterize each step. In this chapter, we outline key factors to consider when preprocessing raw AIRR-Seq data and annotating the genetic origins of the rearranged receptors. We also highlight a number of common difficulties with common AIRR-seq data processing and provide strategies to address them.
|
|
| 2. |
- Smakaj, Erand, et al.
(author)
-
Benchmarking immunoinformatic tools for the analysis of antibody repertoire sequences
- 2020
-
In: Bioinformatics. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1367-4803 .- 1460-2059. ; 36:6, s. 1731-1739
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- SUMMARY: Antibody repertoires reveal insights into the biology of the adaptive immune system and empower diagnostics and therapeutics. There are currently multiple tools available for the annotation of antibody sequences. All downstream analyses such as choosing lead drug candidates depend on the correct annotation of these sequences; however, a thorough comparison of the performance of these tools has not been investigated. Here, we benchmark the performance of commonly used immunoinformatic tools, i.e. IMGT/HighV-QUEST, IgBLAST and MiXCR, in terms of reproducibility of annotation output, accuracy and speed using simulated and experimental high-throughput sequencing datasets.We analyzed changes in IMGT reference germline database in the last 10 years in order to assess the reproducibility of the annotation output. We found that only 73/183 (40%) V, D and J human genes were shared between the reference germline sets used by the tools. We found that the annotation results differed between tools. In terms of alignment accuracy, MiXCR had the highest average frequency of gene mishits, 0.02 mishit frequency and IgBLAST the lowest, 0.004 mishit frequency. Reproducibility in the output of complementarity determining three regions (CDR3 amino acids) ranged from 4.3% to 77.6% with preprocessed data. In addition, run time of the tools was assessed: MiXCR was the fastest tool for number of sequences processed per unit of time. These results indicate that immunoinformatic analyses greatly depend on the choice of bioinformatics tool. Our results support informed decision-making to immunoinformaticians based on repertoire composition and sequencing platforms. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All tools utilized in the paper are free for academic use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
|
|
