| 1. |
- Kanai, M, et al.
(author)
-
- 2023
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Morandi, A, et al.
(author)
-
Consensus and variations in opinions on delirium care : a survey of European delirium specialists
- 2013
-
In: International psychogeriatrics. - : Cambridge University Press. - 1041-6102 .- 1741-203X. ; 25:12, s. 2067-2075
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: There are still substantial uncertainties over best practice in delirium care. The European Delirium Association (EDA) conducted a survey of its members and other interested parties on various aspects of delirium care.Methods: The invitation to participate in the online survey was distributed among the EDA membership. The survey covered assessment, treatment of hyperactive and hypoactive delirium, and organizational management.Results: A total of 200 responses were collected (United Kingdom 28.6%, Netherlands 25.3%, Italy 15%, Switzerland 9.7%, Germany 7.1%, Spain 3.8%, Portugal 2.5%, Ireland 2.5%, Sweden 0.6%, Denmark 0.6%, Austria 0.6%, and others 3.2%). Most of the responders were doctors (80%), working in geriatrics (45%) or internal medicine (14%). Ninety-two per cent of the responders assessed patients for delirium daily. The most commonly used assessment tools were the Confusion Assessment Method (52%) and the Delirium Observation Screening Scale (30%). The first-line choice in the management of hyperactive delirium was a combination of non-pharmacological and pharmacological approaches (61%). Conversely, non-pharmacological management was the first-line choice in hypoactive delirium (67%). Delirium awareness (34%), knowledge (33%), and lack of education (13%) were the most commonly reported barriers to improving the detection of delirium. Interestingly, 63% of the responders referred patients after an episode of delirium to a follow-up clinic.Conclusions: This is the first systematic survey involving an international group of specialists in delirium. Several areas of lack of consensus were found. These results emphasise the importance of further research to improve care of this major unmet medical need.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Olofsson, Birgitta, et al.
(author)
-
Development of dementia in patients with femoral neck fracture who experience postoperative delirium : A three-year follow-up study
- 2018
-
In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0885-6230 .- 1099-1166. ; 33:4, s. 623-632
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives It remains unclear to what extent postoperative delirium (POD) affects the incidence of dementia in hip fracture patients, and the methods used to detect delirium and dementia require validation. The aim of this study was to investigate the development of dementia within 3 years of femoral neck fracture repair surgery, with a focus on POD as a potential predictive factor.Methods Patients were assessed for cognition, delirium, depression, psychological well-being, and nutritional status during their hospitalization as well as 4, 12, and 36 months after the operation. Logistic regression models were used to analyse factors associated with POD and factors associated with the development of dementia.Results The study sample consisted of 135 patients without a history of dementia, of whom 20 (14.8%) were delirious preoperatively and 75 (55.5%) postoperatively. Three years after their operations, 43/135 patients (31.8%) were diagnosed with dementia. A greater portion of patients diagnosed with dementia (39/43, 90.6%) than patients with no dementia (36/92, 39.1%) were included among the 75 patients who had experienced POD (P<0.001). In a logistic regression model, after adjustment for covariates (age, sex, diabetes, delirium pre- and postoperatively, hyperactive delirium, days with delirium, urinary tract infection, and Mini Nutritional Assessment score), POD emerged an independent predictor for the development of new dementia (odds ratio, 15.6; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-91.6) within 3 years after the operation.Conclusion Geriatric hip fracture patients who exhibit POD should be monitored closely for the development of dementia.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Veronese, Nicola, et al.
(author)
-
Interventions to prevent and treat delirium: An umbrella review of randomized controlled trials
- 2024
-
In: Ageing Research Reviews. - : ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD. - 1568-1637 .- 1872-9649. ; 97
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Delirium is a common condition across different settings and populations. The interventions for preventing and managing this condition are still poorly known. The aim of this umbrella review is to synthesize and grade all preventative and therapeutic interventions for delirium. We searched five databases from database inception up to March 15th, 2023 and we included meta -analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to decrease the risk of/the severity of delirium. From 1959 records after deduplication, we included 59 systematic reviews with meta -analyses, providing 110 meta -analytic estimates across populations, interventions, outcomes, settings, and age groups (485 unique RCTs, 172,045 participants). In surgery setting, for preventing delirium, high GRADE evidence supported dexmedetomidine (RR =0.53; 95%CI: 0.46 -0.67, k =13, N =3988) and comprehensive geriatric assessment (OR =0.46; 95%CI =0.32 -0.67, k =3, N =496) in older adults, dexmedetomidine in adults (RR =0.33, 95%CI =0.24 -0.45, k =7, N =1974), A2-adrenergic agonists after induction of anesthesia (OR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.19 -0.40, k =10, N =669) in children. High certainty evidence did not support melatonergic agents in older adults for delirium prevention. Moderate certainty supported the effect of dexmedetomidine in adults and children (k =4), various non -pharmacological interventions in adults and older people (k =4), second -generation antipsychotics in adults and mixed age groups (k =3), EEG -guided anesthesia in adults (k =2), mixed pharmacological interventions (k =1), five other specific pharmacological interventions in children (k =1 each). In conclusion, our work indicates that effective treatments to prevent delirium differ across populations, settings, and age groups. Results inform future guidelines to prevent or treat delirium, accounting for safety and costs of interventions. More research is needed in non -surgical settings.
|
|
