| 1. |
- Aktürk Drake, Memet, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Inledning : flerspråkighet
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Språk och stil. - : Uppsala University. - 1101-1165 .- 2002-4010. ; 31:1, s. 5-12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Bijvoet, Ellen
(författare)
-
Attityder till språk
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Sociolingvistik. - Stockholm : Liber,Stockholm. - 9789147053254 ; , s. 357-
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Bijvoet, Ellen
(författare)
-
Attityder till spår av andra språk i svenskan : en forskningsöversikt
- 2020
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna rapport innehåller en sammanställning av de senaste decenniernas forskning om attityder till sådant som av många människor uppfattas som spår av andra språk i svenskan. Det kan vara lånord, kodväxling eller olika former av brytning eller förortsklang. Rapporten ger en översikt över studier som har gjorts på dessa områden, beskriver de övergripande attitydmönstren och pekar ut några av de forskningsluckor som finns.I rapporten diskuteras bland annat engelskans särställning somhögprestigespråk nummer ett, olika brytningars olika status samt skolans och flerspråkiga elevers syn på kodväxling och förortsslang.Resultaten tolkas mot bakgrund av spridda språkideologiska föreställningar och visar att enspråkighetsnormen fortsatt är mycket stark i det svenska samhället. Alla dessa attitydmönster har betydelse såväl för enskilda människors liv som för svensk språkvård.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Bijvoet, Ellen, et al.
(författare)
-
Folklingvistik
- 2015. - 1
-
Ingår i: Sociolingvistik i praktiken. - Lund : Studentlitteratur. ; , s. 109-129
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Bijvoet, Ellen, et al.
(författare)
-
Förortsförankrat tal – ett inifrån- och ett utifrånperspektiv
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Språk och stil. - : Adolf Noreen-sällskapet - Uppsala University. - 1101-1165 .- 2002-4010. ; NF 31:1, s. 166-200
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article discusses attitudes towards and perceptions of different kinds of suburban-sounding Swedish – ranging from new urban youth styles (here called suburban slang) to a more formal Swedish with a “suburban touch”, due to, in particular, phonological features indexing suburb (here called suburban Swedish). Special attention is paid to the question of how these ways of speaking are labeled, and whether they should be labeled at all. Empirical data from our previous and ongoing studies will be used to illustrate an inside as well as an outside perspective on these issues.Our data confirm that there are a number of labels for the slang language; labels employed both by language users with a suburban background (“insiders”) and by language users who are not familiar with linguistically and culturally heterogenic suburban areas (“outsiders”). This indicates that the slang language is enregistered. By contrast, there is no established label yet for the formal suburban-sounding Swedish. However, this kind of language variation is perceived, discussed and described by the insider participants in our studies. The outsider participants on the other hand do not seem to perceive these nuances within suburban-sounding Swedish. For many of them, the “suburban touch” triggers cognitive and evaluative reactions, commonly associated with the slang language.Since the slang variety is stigmatized in the majority society, such confusion may have neg- ative consequences for young suburban residents – especially when this occurs in situations that are crucial to their opportunities for social inclusion (e.g. in institutional conversations concern- ing access to education, labor and housing). Thus, our stance is that we must talk about risks of exclusion, and that the strategic distinction between slang and “suburban touch” can be helpful in arguing for the acknowledgment of suburban Swedish as simply one of many ways to speak a more formal Swedish with some kind of sociodialectal sound.
|
|
| 10. |
- Bijvoet, Ellen
(författare)
-
Förortssvenska i grindvakters öron : Perceptioner av migrationsrelaterad språklig variation bortom inlärarspråk och förortsslang
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Språk och stil. - : Uppsala University. - 1101-1165 .- 2002-4010. ; NF 28, s. 142-175
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In Sweden, over the few past decades, a large amount of research has been conducted on new urban youth styles, here called suburban slang. More recently, some researchers have begun to focus on the way young individuals from multilingual suburbs speak in more formal situations, here called suburban Swedish – i.e. Swedish close to standard but with a suburban touch, due to, in particular, phonological features indexing suburb. Among the general public, these two ways of speaking are often lumped together under popular labels such as immigrant Swedish or Rinkeby Swedish. As a result, widespread negative attitudes towards the well-known suburban slang risk “rubbing off” on suburban Swedish. This may cause serious problems for the speakers, e.g. if this occurs in a job interview.This danger of negative evaluation was investigated in a folk-linguistic listener study on gatekeeper perceptions. Ten speech stimuli from young adult speakers (among which two samples each of suburban Swedish and suburban slang) were evaluated by 95 gatekeepers (employment officers, student counselors and teachers). A range of data types was analyzed: attitude scales, variety labeling, assessments of the speakers’ occupational level and linguistic background, as well as group discussion data. Results show, among other things, that suburban-sounding speech (slang as well as suburban Swedish) correlates highly with gatekeepers’ low ratings of the speakers’ occupational level. Moreover, the participating gatekeepers lack adequate terminology to differentiate between these two ways of speaking. This implies that sociolinguistic awareness raising should receive more critical attention within the educational sector, including the training for various professions in the public and private sector.
|
|
