1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Fazey, Ioan, et al.
(author)
-
Ten essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research
- 2018
-
In: Energy Research and Social Science. - : Elsevier BV. - 2214-6296 .- 2214-6326. ; 40, s. 54-70
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The most critical question for climate research is no longer about the problem, but about how to facilitate the transformative changes necessary to avoid catastrophic climate-induced change. Addressing this question, however, will require massive upscaling of research that can rapidly enhance learning about transformations. Ten essentials for guiding action-oriented transformation and energy research are therefore presented, framed in relation to second-order science. They include: (1) Focus on transformations to low-carbon, resilient living; (2) Focus on solution processes; (3) Focus on ‘how to’ practical knowledge; (4) Approach research as occurring from within the system being intervened; (5) Work with normative aspects; (6) Seek to transcend current thinking; (7) Take a multi-faceted approach to understand and shape change; (8) Acknowledge the value of alternative roles of researchers; (9) Encourage second-order experimentation; and (10) Be reflexive. Joint application of the essentials would create highly adaptive, reflexive, collaborative and impact-oriented research able to enhance capacity to respond to the climate challenge. At present, however, the practice of such approaches is limited and constrained by dominance of other approaches. For wider transformations to low carbon living and energy systems to occur, transformations will therefore also be needed in the way in which knowledge is produced and used.
|
|
5. |
- Fazey, Ioan, et al.
(author)
-
Transforming knowledge systems for life on Earth : Visions of future systems and how to get there
- 2020
-
In: Energy Research & Social Science. - : Elsevier. - 2214-6296 .- 2214-6326. ; 70
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Formalised knowledge systems, including universities and research institutes, are important for contemporary societies. They are, however, also arguably failing humanity when their impact is measured against the level of progress being made in stimulating the societal changes needed to address challenges like climate change. In this research we used a novel futures-oriented and participatory approach that asked what future envisioned knowledge systems might need to look like and how we might get there. Findings suggest that envisioned future systems will need to be much more collaborative, open, diverse, egalitarian, and able to work with values and systemic issues. They will also need to go beyond producing knowledge about our world to generating wisdom about how to act within it. To get to envisioned systems we will need to rapidly scale methodological innovations, connect innovators, and creatively accelerate learning about working with intractable challenges. We will also need to create new funding schemes, a global knowledge commons, and challenge deeply held assumptions. To genuinely be a creative force in supporting longevity of human and non-human life on our planet, the shift in knowledge systems will probably need to be at the scale of the enlightenment and speed of the scientific and technological revolution accompanying the second World War. This will require bold and strategic action from governments, scientists, civic society and sustained transformational intent.
|
|
6. |
- Lifvergren, Svante, et al.
(author)
-
After a Decade of Action Research: Impactful Systems Improvement in Swedish Healthcare
- 2015
-
In: The Sage Handbook of Action Research 3rd edn.. - 9781446294543
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)abstract
- This chapter illustrates the application over a decade of action research in the Swedish healthcare arena. Its focal question of how to deliver high quality, equitable and efficient care to an aging population – what is termed integrated care for the elderly – is one of the most central issues facing the future development of healthcare systems in all advanced economies. Countering early systems change approaches that entailed a rational, predetermined recipe for accomplishing change following a set of pre-planned steps that were implemented in a top-down fashion, an action research approach was adopted. This approach connects all stakeholders in complex care systems, inviting them to iteratively and jointly reflect on a desirable direction for the system and then subsequently act in that direction. AR practices also encourage reflections on the dynamic learning processes beneath the explicit patterns of an improvement effort, eventually contributing to the evolution of alternative plans for further action. The authors review the Action Research groundings and practices that have since inspired successful levels of integration. After presenting leveraging events in the developmental journey of integrated care, they conclude with key principles and practices pertaining to change processes in complex care systems.
|
|