1. |
- Clausen, Niels, et al.
(author)
-
Similar bleeding phenotype in young children with haemophilia A or B : A cohort study
- 2014
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 20:6, s. 747-755
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The bleeding phenotype has been suggested to differ between haemophilia A and B. More knowledge on the bleeding phenotype at initiation of treatment is important to optimize patient care. The aim of this study was to investigate the severity of the bleeding phenotype and the variation in bleeding in children with severe or moderate haemophilia A and B. Consecutive, previously untreated patients with severe or moderate haemophilia A and B (factor VIII or IX activity <0.01 or 0.01-0.05 IU mL-1 respectively) born between January 1st 2000 and January 1st 2010 were included. Primary outcome was severity of bleeding tendency. Secondary outcome was variation in bleeding pattern. A total of 582 patients with severe haemophilia A and 76 with severe haemophilia B did not differ in age at first exposure to clotting factor (0.81 vs. 0.88 years, P = 0.20), age at first bleed (0.82 vs. 0.88 years, P = 0.36), and age at first joint bleed (1.18 vs. 1.20 years, P = 0.59). Patients with moderate haemophilia were older compared to patients with severe haemophilia. In patients with moderate haemophilia there were no clear differences between haemophilia A and B. Severity and variation in bleeding phenotype are similar during the early stage of treatment in patients with severe and moderate haemophilia A and B respectively. The findings imply that children with haemophilia B should be observed and treated as vigilantly as those with haemophilia A.
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Carcao, M., et al.
(author)
-
Devising a best practice approach to prophylaxis in boys with severe haemophilia: evaluation of current treatment strategies
- 2010
-
In: Haemophilia. - 1351-8216. ; 16, s. 41373-41373
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Data from prospective studies clearly demonstrate the efficacy of prophylactic treatment of haemophilia in reducing joint- or life-threatening bleeding and the associated consequences for quality of life. Debate remains, however, regarding the optimal implementation of prophylaxis. Our aim in this review was to identify a best practice approach to factor replacement prophylaxis in boys with haemophilia. We evaluate prophylactic treatment regimens currently used in Swedish, Canadian and French centres and highlight key issues, including the optimal age for starting prophylaxis, the optimal treatment dosage/schedule and patient compliance.
|
|
5. |
- Chambost, H, et al.
(author)
-
Changing pattern of care of boys with haemophilia in western European centres
- 2005
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216 .- 1365-2516. ; 11:2, s. 92-99
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Haemophilia management is not uniform among countries, even within western Europe, that have close economic, social and cultural relationship. The European Paediatric Network PedNet aims to share experiences in the field of the care of boys with haemophilia. In 1998, a PedNet survey has shown significant disparities in 20 centres from 16 countries, particularly as regards the implementation of prophylaxis regimen. This survey has been updated in 2003 to describe the current status of haemophilia management in 22 centres and the changing pattern of care of boys with severe haemophilia in western Europe. Regular, continuous long-term prophylaxis is provided in all PedNet centres, more than 50% and 80-100% of boys being treated this way in 20/22 and 15/22 centres respectively. Twenty of the 22 centres (91%) recommend continuous prophylaxis (primary or secondary A) for a new patient. The use of recombinant factor VIII concentrates was already widespread in 1998 and a further expansion of recombinant products has been observed over the last 5 years. Recombinant FVIII is now used exclusively in nine centres and for more than 80% of boys with haemophilia A in nine other centres. The use of recombinant and plasma derived FIX is more balanced: among 18 centres where boys with haemophilia B are treated, 14 use recombinant FIX, and nine administer it to a majority of patients. Other modifications of practice have been stressed in this survey, such as more targeted use of central venous devices in the youngest boys and more extensive characterisation of genetic mutations.
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
- Gouw, Samantha C., et al.
(author)
-
Intensity of factor VIII treatment and inhibitor development in children with severe hemophilia A: the RODIN study
- 2013
-
In: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 1528-0020 .- 0006-4971. ; 121:20, s. 4046-4055
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The objective of this study was to examine the association of the intensity of treatment, ranging from high-dose intensive factor VIII (FVIII) treatment to prophylactic treatment, with the inhibitor incidence among previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A. This cohort study aimed to include consecutive patients with a FVIII activity <0.01 IU/mL, born between 2000 and 2010, and observed during their first 75 FVIII exposure days. Intensive FVIII treatment of hemorrhages or surgery at the start of treatment was associated with an increased inhibitor risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-3.0). High-dose FVIII treatment was associated with a higher inhibitor risk than low-dose FVIII treatment (aHR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.0-4.8). Prophylaxis was only associated with a decreased overall inhibitor incidence after 20 exposure days of FVIII. The association with prophylaxis was more pronounced in patients with low-risk F8 genotypes than in patients with high-risk F8 genotypes (aHR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.19-2.0 and aHR, 0.85, 95% CI, 0.51-1.4, respectively). In conclusion, our findings suggest that in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A, high-dosed intensive FVIII treatment increases inhibitor risk and prophylactic FVIII treatment decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.
|
|
8. |
- Ljung, Rolf, et al.
(author)
-
Haemophilia in the first years of life.
- 2008
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216 .- 1365-2516. ; 14 Suppl 3, s. 188-195
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Surgery in infants and young children with haemophilia, when preceded by accurate diagnosis and accompanied by safe and effective factor prophylaxis, is not associated with a significant risk of haemorrhage. Haemophilic newborns undergoing circumcision or major surgery prior to diagnosis and in the absence of appropriate haemostatic prophylaxis remain as a concern. Inhibitor development has replaced haemorrhage as the major surgical complication in the developed world, largely because of the intensity of treatment used to secure haemostasis. For that reason only, essential surgery should be performed. Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) during the neonatal period affects 3.5-4.0% of all haemophilia boys in countries with a good standard of health care, which is considerably (40-80 times) higher than expected in the normal population. Because of the high frequency of sporadic cases, ICH in the neonatal period can only be partially prevented by improved carrier diagnosis and counselling. Infections and thrombosis are the major serious complications of central venous lines. Large differences are seen in the frequency of these complications, the most plausible explanations are probably related to the protocol used for device care, the quality of education and the compliance of the users, an issue addressed in an on-going study.
|
|
9. |
- Ljung, R., et al.
(author)
-
Treatment of children with haemophilia in Europe: A survey of 20 centres in 16 countries
- 2000
-
In: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216. ; 6, s. 619-624
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- A survey was made of the current status of treatment of haemophilic boys at 20 centres in 16 European countries and includes approximately 1500 of the estimated 6500 haemophiliacs in the participating countries. Many mild haemophiliacs are not seen, or seen infrequently, at haemophilia centres and this requires study. Nine of 18 centres provide continuous prophylaxis to 80-100% of their patients, five centres provide it to 55-80% and the remaining four centres to 15-40% of the boys. The median dose given was 6240 U kg-1 year-1 (range 3120-7800). Four centres administered only recombinant concentrates to children with severe haemophilia A, while seven centres administered recombinant concentrates to 75-90% and the remaining centres to less than 50% of the boys (two centres <10%). When asked for the choice of concentrate for a newly diagnosed boy with severe haemophilia A, all but one centre preferred recombinant concentrate. Most boys below 6 years received concentrates via a peripheral vein but three centres preferred a central venous line for 80-100% of the boys. Thirteen of 18 centres applied home treatment to 84-100% of the boys and the remaining five centres to 57-77% of the boys.
|
|
10. |
|
|