1. |
- Brandsten, C, et al.
(författare)
-
Expression of collagen alpha1(I) mRNA variants during tooth and bone formation in the rat
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Journal of dental research. - : SAGE Publications. - 0022-0345 .- 1544-0591. ; 78:1, s. 11-19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Collagen al(I) mRNA is composed of two variants of 5 and 6 kb, differing in the length of the 3' untranslated region. In this work, the nucleotide sequences of the two rat mRNA variants were compared, and their expression pattern in cells forming bone, dentin, and cementum were analyzed. The sequences were determined from cDNA inserts of tooth and bone libraries plus directly from PCR fragments, obtained from bone. A total of 5721 bases of the rat collagen α1(I) sequence from cDNA of tooth and bone was determined. All sequences of the short variant were represented in the long variant. Only the alternatively poly-A additions gave rise to the variants in hard tissue. Two oligonucleotides were chosen as probes, one of which recognized, on Northern blots, the two bands of 5 and 6 kb, and the other the 6-kb variant only. The oligonucleotides were used in in situ hybridization experiments, for study of the distribution of the variants in different extracellular matrix-forming cells. Osteoblasts, odontoblasts, and cementum-associated cells were closely examined in sections from rat maxillae from 2 to 25 days of age. A similar or identical pattern of mRNA expression was observed with both oligonucleotides, indicating that the two mRNA variants were co-expressed in all cases.
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
- Winter, C, et al.
(författare)
-
Targeted sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 across a large unselected breast cancer cohort suggests that one-third of mutations are somatic
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 27:8, s. 8-1532
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: A mutation found in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene of a breast tumor could be either germline or somatically acquired. The prevalence of somatic BRCA1/2 mutations and the ratio between somatic and germline BRCA1/2 mutations in unselected breast cancer patients are currently unclear.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paired normal and tumor DNA was analyzed for BRCA1/2 mutations by massively parallel sequencing in an unselected cohort of 273 breast cancer patients from south Sweden.RESULTS: Deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 (n = 10) or BRCA2 (n = 10) were detected in 20 patients (7%). Deleterious somatic mutations in BRCA1 (n = 4) or BRCA2 (n = 5) were detected in 9 patients (3%). Accordingly, about 1 in 9 breast carcinomas (11%) in our cohort harbor a BRCA1/2 mutation. For each gene, the tumor phenotypes were very similar regardless of the mutation being germline or somatically acquired, whereas the tumor phenotypes differed significantly between wild-type and mutated cases. For age at diagnosis, the patients with somatic BRCA1/2 mutations resembled the wild-type patients (median age at diagnosis, germline BRCA1: 41.5 years; germline BRCA2: 49.5 years; somatic BRCA1/2: 65 years; wild-type BRCA1/2: 62.5 years).CONCLUSIONS: In a population without strong germline founder mutations, the likelihood of a BRCA1/2 mutation found in a breast carcinoma being somatic was ∼1/3 and germline 2/3. This may have implications for treatment and genetic counseling.
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
- Vallon-Christersson, J., et al.
(författare)
-
RNA sequencing-based single sample predictors of molecular subtype and risk of recurrence for clinical assessment of early-stage breast cancer
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-8041 .- 0923-7534. ; 33:Suppl 3, s. 144-145
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundMultigene expression assays for molecular subtypes and biomarkers can aid clinical management of early invasive breast cancer. Based on RNA-sequencing we aimed to develop single-sample predictor (SSP) models for conventional clinical markers, molecular intrinsic subtype and risk of recurrence (ROR).MethodsA uniformly accrued breast cancer cohort of 7743 patients with RNA-sequencing data from fresh tissue was divided into a training set and a reserved test set. We trained SSPs for PAM50 molecular subtypes and ROR assigned by nearest-centroid (NC) and SSPs for conventional clinical markers from histopathology data. Additionally, SSP classifications were compared with Prosigna® in two external cohorts. Prognostic value was assessed using distant recurrence-free interval.ResultsIn the test set, agreement between SSP and NC classifications for PAM50 (five subtypes) and Subtype (four subtypes) was high (85%, Kappa=0.78) and very high (90%, Kappa=0.84) respectively. Accuracy for ROR risk category was high (84%, Kappa=0.75, weighted Kappa=0.90). The prognostic value for SSP and NC was assessed as equivalent. Agreement for SSP and histopathology was very high or high for receptor status, while moderate and poor for Ki67 status and Nottingham histological grade, respectively. SSP concordance with Prosigna® was high for subtype and moderate and high for ROR risk category. In pooled analysis, concordance between SSP and Prosigna® for emulated treatment recommendation for chemotherapy (yes vs. no) was high (85%, Kappa=0.66). In postmenopausal ER+/HER2-/N0 patients SSP application suggested changed treatment recommendations for up to 17% of patients, with nearly balanced escalation and de-escalation of chemotherapy.ConclusionsSSP models for histopathological variables, PAM50, and ROR classifications can be derived from RNA-sequencing that closely matches clinical tests. Agreement and outcome analyses suggest that NC and SSP models are interchangeable on a group-level and nearly so on a patient level. Retrospective evaluation in postmenopausal ER+/HER2-/N0 patients suggested that molecular testing could lead to a changed therapy recommendation for almost one-fifth of patients.
|
|