| 1. |
- Ash, G. I., et al.
(author)
-
Establishing a Global Standard for Wearable Devices in Sport and Exercise Medicine: Perspectives from Academic and Industry Stakeholders
- 2021
-
In: Sports Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0112-1642 .- 1179-2035. ; 51, s. 2237-2250
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Millions of consumer sport and fitness wearables (CSFWs) are used worldwide, and millions of datapoints are generated by each device. Moreover, these numbers are rapidly growing, and they contain a heterogeneity of devices, data types, and contexts for data collection. Companies and consumers would benefit from guiding standards on device quality and data formats. To address this growing need, we convened a virtual panel of industry and academic stakeholders, and this manuscript summarizes the outcomes of the discussion. Our objectives were to identify (1) key facilitators of and barriers to participation by CSFW manufacturers in guiding standards and (2) stakeholder priorities. The venues were the Yale Center for Biomedical Data Science Digital Health Monthly Seminar Series (62 participants) and the New England Chapter of the American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting (59 participants). In the discussion, stakeholders outlined both facilitators of (e.g., commercial return on investment in device quality, lucrative research partnerships, and transparent and multilevel evaluation of device quality) and barriers (e.g., competitive advantage conflict, lack of flexibility in previously developed devices) to participation in guiding standards. There was general agreement to adopt Keadle et al.'s standard pathway for testing devices (i.e., benchtop, laboratory, field-based, implementation) without consensus on the prioritization of these steps. Overall, there was enthusiasm not to add prescriptive or regulatory steps, but instead create a networking hub that connects companies to consumers and researchers for flexible guidance navigating the heterogeneity, multi-tiered development, dynamicity, and nebulousness of the CSFW field.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Hamilton, B. R., et al.
(author)
-
Integrating Transwomen and Female Athletes with Differences of Sex Development (DSD) into Elite Competition: The FIMS 2021 Consensus Statement
- 2021
-
In: Sports Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0112-1642 .- 1179-2035. ; 51:7, s. 1401-1415
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Sport is historically designated by the binary categorization of male and female that conflicts with modern society. Sport's governing bodies should consider reviewing rules determining the eligibility of athletes in the female category as there may be lasting advantages of previously high testosterone concentrations for transwomen athletes and currently high testosterone concentrations in differences in sex development (DSD) athletes. The use of serum testosterone concentrations to regulate the inclusion of such athletes into the elite female category is currently the objective biomarker that is supported by most available scientific literature, but it has limitations due to the lack of sports performance data before, during or after testosterone suppression. Innovative research studies are needed to identify other biomarkers of testosterone sensitivity/responsiveness, including molecular tools to determine the functional status of androgen receptors. The scientific community also needs to conduct longitudinal studies with specific control groups to generate the biological and sports performance data for individual sports to inform the fair inclusion or exclusion of these athletes. Eligibility of each athlete to a sport-specific policy needs to be based on peer-reviewed scientific evidence made available to policymakers from all scientific communities. However, even the most evidence-based regulations are unlikely to eliminate all differences in performance between cisgender women with and without DSD and transwomen athletes. Any remaining advantage held by transwomen or DSD women could be considered as part of the athlete's unique makeup.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Huang, H., et al.
(author)
-
Extracellular domain shedding of the ALK receptor mediates neuroblastoma cell migration
- 2021
-
In: Cell Reports. - : Elsevier BV. - 2211-1247. ; 36:2
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Although activating mutations of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) membrane receptor occur in similar to 10% of neuroblastoma (NB) tumors, the role of the wild-type (WT) receptor, which is aberrantly expressed in most non-mutated cases, is unclear. Both WT and mutant proteins undergo extracellular domain (ECD) cleavage. Here, we map the cleavage site to Asn654-Leu655 and demonstrate that cleavage inhibition of WT ALK significantly impedes NB cell migration with subsequent prolongation of survival in mouse models. Cleavage inhibition results in the downregulation of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene signature, with decreased nuclear localization and occupancy of beta-catenin at EMT gene promoters. We further show that cleavage is mediated by matrix metalloproteinase 9, whose genetic and pharmacologic inactivation inhibits cleavage and decreases NB cell migration. Together, our results indicate a pivotal role forWTALK ECD cleavage in NB pathogenesis, which may be harnessed for therapeutic benefit.
|
|
| 7. |
- Kappos, Ludwig, et al.
(author)
-
Siponimod versus placebo in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (EXPAND): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study
- 2018
-
In: The Lancet. - 0140-6736 .- 1474-547X. ; 391, s. 1263-1273
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- © 2018 Elsevier Ltd Background: No treatment has consistently shown efficacy in slowing disability progression in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We assessed the effect of siponimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor 1,5 modulator, on disability progression in patients with SPMS. Methods: This event-driven and exposure-driven, double-blind, phase 3 trial was done at 292 hospital clinics and specialised multiple sclerosis centres in 31 countries. Using interactive response technology to assign numbers linked to treatme nt arms, patients (age 18–60 years) with SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3·0–6·5 were randomly assigned (2:1) to once daily oral siponimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 3 years or until the occurrence of a prespecified number of confirmed disability progression (CDP) events. The primary endpoint was time to 3-month CDP. Efficacy was assessed for the full analysis set (ie, all randomly assigned and treated patients); safety was assessed for the safety set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01665144. Findings: 1651 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 5, 2013, and June 2, 2015 (1105 to the siponimod group, and 546 to the placebo group). One patient did not sign the consent form, and five patients did not receive study drug, all of whom were in the siponimod group. 1645 patients were included in the analyses (1099 in the siponimod group and 546 in the placebo). At baseline, the mean time since first multiple sclerosis symptoms was 16·8 years (SD 8·3), and the mean time since conversion to SPMS was 3·8 years (SD 3·5); 1055 (64%) patients had not relapsed in the previous 2 years, and 918 (56%) of 1651 needed walking assistance. 903 (82%) patients receiving siponimod and 424 (78%) patients receiving placebo completed the study. 288 (26%) of 1096 patients receiving siponimod and 173 (32%) of 545 patients receiving placebo had 3-month CDP (hazard ratio 0·79, 95% CI 0·65–0·95; relative risk reduction 21%; p=0·013). Adverse events occurred in 975 (89%) of 1099 patients receiving siponimod versus 445 (82%) of 546 patients receiving placebo; serious adverse events were reported for 197 (18%) patients in the siponimod group versus 83 (15%) patients in the placebo group. Lymphopenia, increased liver transaminase concentration, bradycardia and bradyarrhythmia at treatment initiation, macular oedema, hypertension, varicella zoster reactivation, and convulsions occurred more frequently with siponimod than with placebo. Initial dose titration mitigated cardiac first-dose effects. Frequencies of infections, malignancies, and fatalities did not differ between groups. Interpretation: Siponimod reduced the risk of disability progression with a safety profile similar to that of other S1P modulators and is likely to be a useful treatment for SPMS. Funding: Novartis Pharma AG.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Yusuf, D, et al.
(author)
-
The transcription factor encyclopedia
- 2012
-
In: Genome biology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1474-760X .- 1465-6906. ; 13:3, s. R24-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 10. |
- Zlotta, AR, et al.
(author)
-
Hormone therapy: Improving therapy decisions and monitoring
- 2006
-
In: European Urology. Supplement. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-9056. ; 5:3, s. 369-376
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives: Due to the increased diagnosis of prostate cancer at earlier stages and the overall increased use of hormone therapy, also in earlier disease stages, many patients will receive long-term hormone therapy. Therefore, the timing of initiating hormone therapy and the type of hormone therapy have become crucial items in the appropriate management of patients with prostate cancer. in addition, as patients receiving long-term hormone therapy are at an increased risk of acute and chronic side effects, the monitoring of these patients deserves attention. The timing and type of hormone therapy and the monitoring of patients receiving hormone therapy are reviewed in this paper. Methods: A literature review was performed in Medline. Results: The prostate specific antigen doubling time (PSA DT) has been evaluated to determine the risk of disease progression in patients having a relapse after radical therapy. Patients with a PSA DT of < 12 mo have a high risk for disease progression and should probably receive hormone therapy rapidly. In case of a diagnosis of advanced prostate cancer, there is not yet a consensus on when to start hormone therapy. During an interactive voting session, over 200 urologists indicated that the preferred luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist should be able to achieve a castrate level of <= 20 ng/dl, as well as to maintain these low testosterone levels without inducing acute-on-chronic or breakthrough responses. Eligard, a novel depot formulation of leuprolide acetate, appears to be the only LHRH agonist currently available able to achieve and maintain serum testosterone levels below the castrate level of 20 ng/dl. Patients receiving long-term hormone therapy should be adequately monitored during follow-up visits. Besides frequent assessment of the PSA level and other recommended assessments, serum testosterone levels should also be determined. In this way, response to therapy can be evaluated, relevant testosterone rises after initial treatment response can be detected, and potential reasons for unexpected PSA rises can be verified, which will improve the monitoring of patients receiving hormone therapy. Conclusions: Measuring testosterone levels before and during therapy initiation might improve hormone therapy decisions and monitoring. Eligard is an interesting LHRH agonist because it is able to achieve and maintain testosterone levels below 20 ng/dl. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
|
|
