SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Deak Stefan) "

Search: WFRF:(Deak Stefan)

  • Result 1-4 of 4
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Biurrun, Idoia, et al. (author)
  • Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats
  • 2021
  • In: Journal of Vegetation Science. - Oxford : John Wiley & Sons. - 1100-9233 .- 1654-1103. ; 32:4
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Journal of Vegetation Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association for Vegetation Science.Aims: Understanding fine-grain diversity patterns across large spatial extents is fundamental for macroecological research and biodiversity conservation. Using the GrassPlot database, we provide benchmarks of fine-grain richness values of Palaearctic open habitats for vascular plants, bryophytes, lichens and complete vegetation (i.e., the sum of the former three groups). Location: Palaearctic biogeographic realm. Methods: We used 126,524 plots of eight standard grain sizes from the GrassPlot database: 0.0001, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 and 1,000 m2 and calculated the mean richness and standard deviations, as well as maximum, minimum, median, and first and third quartiles for each combination of grain size, taxonomic group, biome, region, vegetation type and phytosociological class. Results: Patterns of plant diversity in vegetation types and biomes differ across grain sizes and taxonomic groups. Overall, secondary (mostly semi-natural) grasslands and natural grasslands are the richest vegetation type. The open-access file ”GrassPlot Diversity Benchmarks” and the web tool “GrassPlot Diversity Explorer” are now available online (https://edgg.org/databases/GrasslandDiversityExplorer) and provide more insights into species richness patterns in the Palaearctic open habitats. Conclusions: The GrassPlot Diversity Benchmarks provide high-quality data on species richness in open habitat types across the Palaearctic. These benchmark data can be used in vegetation ecology, macroecology, biodiversity conservation and data quality checking. While the amount of data in the underlying GrassPlot database and their spatial coverage are smaller than in other extensive vegetation-plot databases, species recordings in GrassPlot are on average more complete, making it a valuable complementary data source in macroecology. © 2021 The Authors.
  •  
2.
  • Fernandez-Anez, Nieves, et al. (author)
  • Current Wildland Fire Patterns and Challenges in Europe : A Synthesis of National Perspectives
  • 2021
  • In: Air, Soil and Water Research. - : SAGE Publications. - 1178-6221. ; 14, s. 1-19
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Changes in climate, land use, and land management impact the occurrence and severity of wildland fires in many parts of the world. This is particularly evident in Europe, where ongoing changes in land use have strongly modified fire patterns over the last decades. Although satellite data by the European Forest Fire Information System provide large-scale wildland fire statistics across European countries, there is still a crucial need to collect and summarize in-depth local analysis and understanding of the wildland fire condition and associated challenges across Europe. This article aims to provide a general overview of the current wildland fire patterns and challenges as perceived by national representatives, supplemented by national fire statistics (2009–2018) across Europe. For each of the 31 countries included, we present a perspective authored by scientists or practitioners from each respective country, representing a wide range of disciplines and cultural backgrounds. The authors were selected from members of the COST Action “Fire and the Earth System: Science & Society” funded by the European Commission with the aim to share knowledge and improve communication about wildland fire. Where relevant, a brief overview of key studies, particular wildland fire challenges a country is facing, and an overview of notable recent fire events are also presented. Key perceived challenges included (1) the lack of consistent and detailed records for wildland fire events, within and across countries, (2) an increase in wildland fires that pose a risk to properties and human life due to high population densities and sprawl into forested regions, and (3) the view that, irrespective of changes in management, climate change is likely to increase the frequency and impact of wildland fires in the coming decades. Addressing challenge (1) will not only be valuable in advancing national and pan-European wildland fire management strategies, but also in evaluating perceptions (2) and (3) against more robust quantitative evidence.
  •  
3.
  • Idoia Biurrun, Idoia, et al. (author)
  • GrassPlot v. 2.00 – first update on the database of multi-scale plant diversity in Palaearctic grasslands
  • 2019
  • In: Palaearctic Grasslands. - : Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG). - 2627-9827. ; :44, s. 26-47
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • GrassPlot is a collaborative vegetation-plot database organised by the Eurasian Dry Grassland Group (EDGG) and listed in the Global Index of Vegetation-Plot Databases (GIVD ID EU-00-003). Following a previous Long Database Report (Dengler et al. 2018, Phytocoenologia 48, 331–347), we provide here the first update on content and functionality of GrassPlot. The current version (GrassPlot v. 2.00) contains a total of 190,673 plots of different grain sizes across 28,171 independent plots, with 4,654 nested-plot series including at least four grain sizes. The database has improved its content as well as its functionality, including addition and harmonization of header data (land use, information on nestedness, structure and ecology) and preparation of species composition data. Currently, GrassPlot data are intensively used for broad-scale analyses of different aspects of alpha and beta diversity in grassland ecosystems.
  •  
4.
  • Miloff, Alexander, et al. (author)
  • Automated virtual reality exposure therapy for spider phobia vs. in-vivo one-session treatment : A randomized non-inferiority trial
  • 2019
  • In: Behaviour Research and Therapy. - : Elsevier BV. - 0005-7967 .- 1873-622X. ; 118, s. 130-140
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • This study compared the efficacy of a technician-assisted single-session virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for the treatment of spider phobia featuring low-cost consumer-available hardware and novel automated software to gold-standard in-vivo one-session treatment (OST), using a parallel group randomized non-inferiority design. Method Participants (N = 100) were randomized to VRET and OST arms. Assessors blinded to treatment allocation evaluated participants at pre- and post-treatment as well follow-up (3 and 12 months) using a behavioral approach test (BAT) and self-rated fear of spider, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales. A maximum post-treatment difference of 2-points on the BAT qualified as non-inferiority margin. Results Linear mixed models noted large, significant reductions in behavioral avoidance and self-reported fear in both groups at post-treatment, with VRET approaching the strong treatment benefits of OST over time. Non-inferiority was identified at 3- and 12- months follow-up but was significantly worse until 12-months. There was no significant difference on a questionnaire measuring negative effects. Conclusions Automated VRET efficaciously reduced spider phobia symptoms in the short-term and was non-inferior to in-vivo exposure therapy in the long-term. VRET effectiveness trials are warranted to evaluate real-world benefits and non-specific therapeutic factors accruing from the presence of a technician during treatment. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02533310).
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-4 of 4
Type of publication
journal article (3)
research review (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (4)
Author/Editor
Mayrhofer, Helmut (2)
Alatalo, Juha M. (2)
Lindborg, Regina (2)
Jeanneret, Philippe (2)
Pielech, Remigiusz (2)
Boch, Steffen (2)
show more...
Waldén, Emelie (2)
Deng, Lei (2)
Hajek, Michal (2)
Bergamini, Ariel (2)
Dembicz, Iwona (2)
Kozub, Łukasz (2)
Marcenò, Corrado (2)
Van Meerbeek, Koenra ... (2)
Guarino, Riccardo (2)
Burrascano, Sabina (2)
Essl, Franz (2)
Filibeck, Goffredo (2)
Jiménez-Alfaro, Borj ... (2)
Kuzemko, Anna (2)
Roleček, Jan (2)
Afif, Elias (2)
Aleffi, Michele (2)
Bátori, Zoltán (2)
Belonovskaya, Elena (2)
Bhatta, Kuber Prasad (2)
Campos, Juan Antonio (2)
Cancellieri, Laura (2)
Ceulemans, Tobias (2)
Csergő, Anna Mária (2)
Deák, Balázs (2)
Demeter, László (2)
Dolezal, Jiri (2)
Dolnik, Christian (2)
Dřevojan, Pavel (2)
Ecker, Klaus (2)
Erschbamer, Brigitta (2)
Etzold, Jonathan (2)
Fjellstad, Wendy (2)
García-Mijangos, Itz ... (2)
Grytnes, John-Arvid (2)
Güler, Behlül (2)
Janišová, Monika (2)
Kącki, Zygmunt (2)
Kapfer, Jutta (2)
Kelemen, András (2)
Kirschner, Philipp (2)
Lepš, Jan (2)
Löbel, Swantje (2)
Lomba, Angela (2)
show less...
University
Stockholm University (3)
University of Gävle (2)
Halmstad University (1)
Linköping University (1)
Jönköping University (1)
Lund University (1)
show more...
RISE (1)
Karolinska Institutet (1)
show less...
Language
English (4)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Natural sciences (3)
Agricultural Sciences (1)
Social Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view