| 1. |
- Cossarizza, A., et al.
(author)
-
Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition)
- 2019
-
In: European Journal of Immunology. - : Wiley. - 0014-2980 .- 1521-4141. ; 49:10, s. 1457-1973
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- These guidelines are a consensus work of a considerable number of members of the immunology and flow cytometry community. They provide the theory and key practical aspects of flow cytometry enabling immunologists to avoid the common errors that often undermine immunological data. Notably, there are comprehensive sections of all major immune cell types with helpful Tables detailing phenotypes in murine and human cells. The latest flow cytometry techniques and applications are also described, featuring examples of the data that can be generated and, importantly, how the data can be analysed. Furthermore, there are sections detailing tips, tricks and pitfalls to avoid, all written and peer-reviewed by leading experts in the field, making this an essential research companion.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sargeson, A. M., et al.
(author)
-
Names and symbols for the transfermium elements
- 1997
-
In: Pure and Applied Chemistry. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 0033-4545 .- 1365-3075. ; 69:12, s. 2471-2473
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The recommendations (ref. 1) of the Commission on Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry (CNIC) on the nomenclature of the transfermium elements (101-109, inclusive) were considered by the IUPAC Bureau at Guildford (UK) in September 1995. As a result of the various criticisms of the recommendations and theway that they had been processed, the Bureau decided to adopt the recommendations as provisional and to circulate them to national/regional nomenclature centres in the normal way, with notices to be published innational/regional chemistry journals and magazines, requesting submission of comments to CNIC. In particular, the National Adhering Organizations (NAOs) were invited to express their views concerning the extant proposals for the names of these elements and the principles and traditions used to derive them. The response from the general chemical community was small, and the bulk of the replies came from nuclear scientists.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sargeson, A. M., et al.
(author)
-
Names and symbols of transfermium elements (IUPAC recommendations 1994)
- 1994
-
In: Pure and Applied Chemistry. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 0033-4545 .- 1365-3075. ; 66:12, s. 2419-2421
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The Transfermium Working Group (TWG) was set up in 1986 under the joint auspices of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP). Its conclusions, duly endorsed by IUPAC and IUPAP, were published in the following three reports:1. Criteria that must be satisfied for the discovery of a new chemical element to be recognized, Pure & Appl. Chem., 63, 879-886 (1991).2. Discovery of the transfermium elements: Introduction to the discovery profiles, Pure & Appl. Chem., 65, 1757-1763 (1993).3, Discovery of the transfermium elements: Discovery profiles of the transfermium elements, Pure & Appl. Chem., 65, 1764-1814 (1993).IUPAC went a stage further by inviting responses on reports 2 and 3 from the three major groups concerned, i.e., Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, California; Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; and Gesellschaft fur Schwerionenforschung , Darmstadt. These responses together with the TWG's reply to the responses were published unedited in Pure & Appl. Chem.,Vol. 65, (1993), pp. 1815-1824.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Dress, A., et al.
(author)
-
On line arrangements in the hyperbolic plane
- 2002
-
In: European journal of combinatorics (Print). - : Elsevier BV. - 0195-6698 .- 1095-9971. ; 23:5, s. 549-557
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Given a finite collection L of lines in the hyperbolic plane H, we denote by k = k(L) its Karzanov number, i.e., the maximal number of pairwise intersecting lines in L, and by C(L) and n = n(L) the set and the number, respectively, of those points at infinity that are incident with at least one line from L. By using purely combinatorial properties of cyclic seta:, it is shown that #L less than or equal to 2nk - ((2k+1)(2)) always holds and that #L equals 2nk - ((2k+1)(2)) if and only if there is no collection L' of lines in H with L subset of or equal to L', k(L') = k(L) and C(L') = C(L).
|
|
| 8. |
- Dress, A., et al.
(author)
-
Six points suffice : How to check for metric consistency
- 2001
-
In: European journal of combinatorics (Print). - : Elsevier BV. - 0195-6698 .- 1095-9971. ; 22:4, s. 465-474
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- In many areas of data analysis, it is desirable to have tools at hand for analyzing the structure of distance tables-or, in more mathematical terms, of finite metric spaces. One such tool, known as split decomposition theory has proven particularly useful in this respect. Tbe class of so-called totally decomposable metrics forms a cornerstone for this theory, and much work has been devoted to their study. Recently, it has become apparent that a particular subclass of these metrics, the consistent metrics, are also of fundamental importance. In this paper, we give a six-point characterization of consistent metrics amongst the totally decomposable ones.
|
|
