SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Feig M) "

Search: WFRF:(Feig M)

  • Result 1-8 of 8
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Aad, G., et al. (author)
  • 2015
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
  •  
2.
  • Schael, S., et al. (author)
  • Electroweak measurements in electron positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP
  • 2013
  • In: Physics Reports. - : Elsevier BV. - 0370-1573 .- 1873-6270. ; 532:4, s. 119-244
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Electroweak measurements performed with data taken at the electron positron collider LEP at CERN from 1995 to 2000 are reported. The combined data set considered in this report corresponds to a total luminosity of about 3 fb(-1) collected by the four LEP experiments ALEPH, DELPHI, 13 and OPAL, at centre-of-mass energies ranging from 130 GeV to 209 GeV. Combining the published results of the four LEP experiments, the measurements include total and differential cross-sections in photon-pair, fermion-pair and four-fermion production, the latter resulting from both double-resonant WW and ZZ production as well as singly resonant production. Total and differential cross-sections are measured precisely, providing a stringent test of the Standard Model at centre-of-mass energies never explored before in electron positron collisions. Final-state interaction effects in four-fermion production, such as those arising from colour reconnection and Bose Einstein correlations between the two W decay systems arising in WW production, are searched for and upper limits on the strength of possible effects are obtained. The data are used to determine fundamental properties of the W boson and the electroweak theory. Among others, the mass and width of the W boson, m(w) and Gamma(w), the branching fraction of W decays to hadrons, B(W -> had), and the trilinear gauge-boson self-couplings g(1)(Z), K-gamma and lambda(gamma), are determined to be: m(w) = 80.376 +/- 0.033 GeV Gamma(w) = 2.195 +/- 0.083 GeV B(W -> had) = 67.41 +/- 0.27% g(1)(Z) = 0.984(-0.020)(+0.018) K-gamma - 0.982 +/- 0.042 lambda(gamma) = 0.022 +/- 0.019. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Martínez, Beatriz, et al. (author)
  • Evaluation of the LSA-SAF Gross Primary Production product derived from SEVIRI/MSG data (MGPP)
  • 2020
  • In: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. - : Elsevier BV. - 0924-2716. ; 159, s. 220-236
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The objective of this study is to describe a completely new 10-day gross primary production (GPP) product(MGPP LSA-411) based on data from the geostationary SEVIRI/MSG satellite within the LSA SAF (Land SurfaceAnalysis SAF) as part of the SAF (Satellite Application Facility) network of EUMETSAT.The methodology relies on the Monteith approach. It considers that GPP is proportional to the absorbedphotosynthetically active radiation APAR and the proportionality factor is known as the light use efficiency ε. Aparameterization of this factor is proposed as the product of a εmax, corresponding to the canopy functioningunder optimal conditions, and a coefficient quantifying the reduction of photosynthesis as a consequence ofwater stress. A three years data record (2015–2017) was used in an assessment against site-level eddy covariance(EC) tower GPP estimates and against other Earth Observation (EO) based GPP products. The site-level comparisonindicated that the MGPP product performed better than the other EO based GPP products with 48% ofthe observations being below the optimal accuracy (absolute error < 1.0 g m−2 day−1) and 75% of these databeing below the user requirement threshold (absolute error < 3.0 g m−2 day−1). The largest discrepanciesbetween the MGPP product and the other GPP products were found for forests whereas small differences wereobserved for the other land cover types. The integration of this GPP product with the ensemble of LSA-SAF MSG
  •  
8.
  • Scott, Eleanor M., et al. (author)
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Birth Weight : Informing Management of Type 1 Diabetes Throughout Pregnancy
  • 2022
  • In: Diabetes Care. - : American Diabetes Association. - 0149-5992. ; 45:8, s. 1724-1734
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE To determine gestational weekly changes in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and 24-h glucose profiles and their relationship to infant birth weight in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS An analysis of >10.5 million CGM glucose measures from 386 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes from two international multicenter studies was performed. CGM glucose metrics and 24-h glucose profiles were calculated for each gestational week, and the relationship to normal (10–90th percentile) and large (>90th percentile) for gestational age (LGA) birth weight infants was determined. RESULTS Mean CGM glucose concentration fell and percentage of time spent in the pregnancy target range of 3.5–7.8 mmol/L (63–140 mg/dL) increased in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy and plateaued until 28 weeks of gestation, before further improvement in mean glucose and percentage of time in range until delivery. Maternal CGM glucose metrics diverged at 10 weeks of gestation, with significantly lower mean CGM glucose concentration (7.1 mmol/L; 95% CI 7.05–7.15 [127.8 mg/dL; 95% CI 126.9–128.7] vs. 7.5 mmol/L; 95% CI 7.45–7.55 [135 mg/dL; 95% CI 134.1–135.9]) and higher percentage of time in range (55%; 95% CI 54–56 vs. 50%; 95% CI 49–51) in women who had normal versus LGA. The 24-h glucose profiles were significantly higher across the day from 10 weeks of gestation in LGA. CONCLUSIONS Normalbirthweightisassociatedwithachievingsignificantly lower mean CGM glucose concentration across the 24-h day and higher CGM time in range from before the end of the first trimester, emphasizing the need for a shift in clinical management, with increased focus on using weekly CGM glucose targets for optimizing maternal glycemia from early pregnancy.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-8 of 8

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view