1. |
- Clemente, Francesco, et al.
(författare)
-
Touch and Hearing Mediate Osseoperception
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2045-2322. ; 7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Osseoperception is the sensation arising from the mechanical stimulation of a bone-anchored prosthesis. Here we show that not only touch, but also hearing is involved in this phenomenon. Using mechanical vibrations ranging from 0.1 to 6 kHz, we performed four psychophysical measures (perception threshold, sensation discrimination, frequency discrimination and reaction time) on 12 upper and lower limb amputees and found that subjects: consistently reported perceiving a sound when the stimulus was delivered at frequencies equal to or above 400 Hz; were able to discriminate frequency differences between stimuli delivered at high stimulation frequencies (similar to 1500 Hz); improved their reaction time for bimodal stimuli (i.e. when both vibration and sound were perceived). Our results demonstrate that osseoperception is a multisensory perception, which can explain the improved environment perception of bone-anchored prosthesis users. This phenomenon might be exploited in novel prosthetic devices to enhance their control, thus ultimately improving the amputees' quality of life.
|
|
2. |
- Eeg-Olofsson, Måns, 1967, et al.
(författare)
-
BCI-bone conduction implant.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: The Fourth International Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing – Craniofacial Osseointegration. Newcastle, UK.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
3. |
- Eeg-Olofsson, Måns, 1967, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of bone tissue formation in a flat surface attachment of a Bone Conduction Implant - A pilot study in a sheep model
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Audiology & Neurotology Extra. - : S. Karger AG. - 1664-5537. ; 4:3, s. 62-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Bone Conduction Implant (BCI) is a new bone conduction hearing device implanted under intact skin. The transducer has a flat direct contact to the mastoid part of the temporal bone and no screws are used. The sound signal is transmitted from the external audio processor to the implant by means of magnetic induction. In this study, osseointegration of a flat passive BCI transducer dummy in sheep skulls was assessed using quantitative and qualitative histology as well as Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Computed Tomography (CT). The histology results were also related to the mechanical properties of the bone to implant interface. Eight months after the surgical implantation, histology sections of the bone close to the implant showed bone remodelling, compact bone and some degree of osseointegration. The histological findings corresponded well to the mechanical measurements indicating stiffer bone close to the implant, and unaffected skull vibration transmission. Neither CBCT nor CT had enough resolution to visualize the bone to implant interface in detail. In this study, using an animal model, it is shown that a flat implant in contact with bone, can be a feasible method for efficient vibration transmission to the skull bone.
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988
(författare)
-
A New Audiometric Bone Vibrator, Radioear B81, and the Bone Conduction Implant with Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- 2015
-
Licentiatavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Hearing by air conduction (AC) and bone conduction (BC) are attributed to be the natural ways of stimulating the cochlea. With AC hearing, the cochlea is stimulated by air pressure variations via the ear canal, whereas with BC hearing, sound vibrations are transmitted thru the skull bone to the cochlea. Sensorineural hearing losses are commonly rehabilitated with conventional AC hearing aids in the ear canal, but patients who are suffering from conductive or mixed hearing losses, and who are unable to use AC hearing aids, may instead use bone conduction devices (BCDs). In order to determine the type and degree of hearing loss, the BC hearing thresholds are measured using a bone vibrator, and then analyzed together with the AC hearing thresholds to suggest an appropriate rehabilitation alternative.This thesis deals with two BC hearing related topics. The first topic is evaluating a new audiometric bone vibrator, Radioear B81, which is assumed to offer more accurate BC hearing threshold measurements. The second topic is related to a new type of active transcutaneous BCD, called the Bone Conduction Implant (BCI), which leaves the skin intact by using a wireless solution that does not require a permanent skin penetration. Even though the applications are different, both devices use the same Balanced Electromagnetic Separation Transducer (BEST) principle as motor unit in their design.The audiometric bone vibrator Radioear B81 was found to have an improved low frequency performance and can produce higher output levels with less harmonic distortion than was possible before. In a clinical study of the first six patients, it was found that the BCI is a realistic alternative to already commercially available BCDs. In technical evaluations, the BCI was shown to be insensitive to skin thickness variations and to have robust output, and that it possibly tolerates magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla.
|
|
6. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988, et al.
(författare)
-
Bone Conduction Stimulated VEMP Using the B250 Transducer
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. - 1179-1470. ; 14, s. 225-237
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Bone conduction (BC) stimulation is rarely used for clinical testing of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) due to the limitations of conventional stimulation alternatives. The aim of this study is to compare VEMP using the new B250 transducer with the Minishaker and air conduction (AC) stimulation. Methods: Thirty normal subjects between 20 and 37 years old and equal gender distribution were recruited, 15 for ocular VEMP and 15 for cervical VEMP. Four stimulation conditions were compared: B250 on the mastoid (FM); Minishaker and B250 on the forehead (FZ); and AC stimulation using an insert earphone. Results: It was found that B250 at FM required a statistically significant lower hearing level than with AC stimulation, in average 41 dB and 35 dB lower for ocular VEMP and cervical VEMP, respectively, but gave longer n10 (1.1 ms) and n23 (1.6 ms). No statistical difference was found between B250 at FM and Minishaker at FZ. Conclusion: VEMP stimulated with B250 at FM gave similar response as the Minishaker at FZ and for a much lower hearing level than AC stimulation using insert earphones.
|
|
7. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988, et al.
(författare)
-
Electro-acoustic performance of the new bone vibrator Radioear B81: A comparison with the conventional Radioear B71
- 2015
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Audiology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186. ; 54:5, s. 334-340
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The objective is to evaluate the electro-acoustic performance of a new audiometric bone vibrator, the B81 from Radioear Corporation, USA. Comparison will be made with the widely used B71 which has well-known limitations at low frequencies. Design: The B81 is based on the balanced electromagnetic separation transducer (BEST) principle where static forces are counterbalanced so that nonlinear distortion forces are reduced and maximum hearing levels can be increased. Study sample: Maximum hearing level, total harmonic distortion (THD), frequency response, and electrical impedance were measured for six devices of each bone vibrator type on an artificial mastoid. Results: It was found that B81 reaches 10.7-22.0 dB higher maximum (@ THD. 6% or V-in. 6 V-RMS) hearing levels than B71 for frequencies below 1500 Hz, and had significantly lower THD up to 1000 Hz. There was no statistically significant difference between their frequency response, except a deviation at the mid frequencies (alpha = 0.01) where B81 was more efficient and the electrical impedances were practically the same. Conclusions: In general, B81 had an improved electro-acoustic performance compared to B71 and is compatible with same audiometers. In particular, B81 allows for sensorineural hearing loss to be measured at considerably higher hearing levels than with B71 below 1500 Hz.
|
|
8. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988, et al.
(författare)
-
Electroacoustic evaluation of the bone conduction transducer B250 for vestibular and hearing diagnostics in comparison with Radioear B71 and B81
- 2024
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Audiology. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186. ; In Press
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The objective is to evaluate the electroacoustic performance of the B250 transducer and to compare it with the two most widely used audiometric transducers B71 and B81. Design: The electroacoustic performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity level, distortion, maximum hearing level and electrical impedance. Study sample: Six B250 prototype transducers were evaluated and compared with published data of B71 and B81 together with complementary measurements of maximum hearing level at 125 Hz and phase of electrical impedance. Differences in reference equivalent threshold vibratory force levels were estimated by comparing hearing threshold measurements of 60 healthy ears using B81 and B250. Results: B250 has approximately 27 dB higher sensitivity levels than both B71 and B81 at 250 Hz and can generate higher maximum hearing level at low frequencies: 11.8 to 35.8 dB (125–1000 Hz) higher than B71, and 1.4 to 18.6 dB (125–750 Hz) higher than B81. The maximum average difference in reference threshold force levels was 13.5 ± 8.7 dB higher for B250 at 250 Hz compared to B81. Conclusions: B250 can produce higher output force with less distortion than B71 and B81, especially at 125 and 250 Hz, which could possibly improve low frequency investigations of the audio-vestibular system.
|
|
9. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988, et al.
(författare)
-
Electroacoustic evaluation of the bone conduction transducer B250 for vestibular and hearing diagnostics in comparison with Radioear B71 and B81
- 2024
-
Ingår i: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY. - 1499-2027 .- 1708-8186.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ObjectiveThe objective is to evaluate the electroacoustic performance of the B250 transducer and to compare it with the two most widely used audiometric transducers B71 and B81.DesignThe electroacoustic performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity level, distortion, maximum hearing level and electrical impedance.Study sampleSix B250 prototype transducers were evaluated and compared with published data of B71 and B81 together with complementary measurements of maximum hearing level at 125 Hz and phase of electrical impedance. Differences in reference equivalent threshold vibratory force levels were estimated by comparing hearing threshold measurements of 60 healthy ears using B81 and B250.ResultsB250 has approximately 27 dB higher sensitivity levels than both B71 and B81 at 250 Hz and can generate higher maximum hearing level at low frequencies: 11.8 to 35.8 dB (125-1000 Hz) higher than B71, and 1.4 to 18.6 dB (125-750 Hz) higher than B81. The maximum average difference in reference threshold force levels was 13.5 +/- 8.7 dB higher for B250 at 250 Hz compared to B81.ConclusionsB250 can produce higher output force with less distortion than B71 and B81, especially at 125 and 250 Hz, which could possibly improve low frequency investigations of the audio-vestibular system.
|
|
10. |
- Fredén Jansson, Karl-Johan, 1988, et al.
(författare)
-
Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the bone conduction implant - a pilot study at 1.5 Tesla.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.). - 1179-1470. ; 8, s. 413-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The objective of this pilot study was to investigate if an active bone conduction implant (BCI) used in an ongoing clinical study withstands magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of 1.5 Tesla. In particular, the MRI effects on maximum power output (MPO), total harmonic distortion (THD), and demagnetization were investigated. Implant activation and image artifacts were also evaluated.
|
|