| 1. |
- Dahlgren, Jonas, et al.
(author)
-
Här trivs blåbär och lingon bäst
- 2012
-
In: Skog & mark : om tillståndet i svensk landmiljö. 2012. - 9789162012939 ; , s. 24-26
-
Book chapter (pop. science, debate, etc.)
|
|
| 2. |
- Dahlgren, Jonas, et al.
(author)
-
Positive feedbacks and alternative stable states in forest leaf types
- 2024
-
In: Nature Communications. - 2041-1723. ; 15
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The emergence of alternative stable states in forest systems has significant implications for the functioning and structure of the terrestrial biosphere, yet empirical evidence remains scarce. Here, we combine global forest biodiversity observations and simulations to test for alternative stable states in the presence of evergreen and deciduous forest types. We reveal a bimodal distribution of forest leaf types across temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere that cannot be explained by the environment alone, suggesting signatures of alternative forest states. Moreover, we empirically demonstrate the existence of positive feedbacks in tree growth, recruitment and mortality, with trees having 4–43% higher growth rates, 14–17% higher survival rates and 4–7 times higher recruitment rates when they are surrounded by trees of their own leaf type. Simulations show that the observed positive feedbacks are necessary and sufficient to generate alternative forest states, which also lead to dependency on history (hysteresis) during ecosystem transition from evergreen to deciduous forests and vice versa. We identify hotspots of bistable forest types in evergreen-deciduous ecotones, which are likely driven by soilrelated positive feedbacks. These findings are integral to predicting the distribution of forest biomes, and aid to our understanding of biodiversity, carbon turnover, and terrestrial climate feedbacks.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Nilsson, Per, et al.
(author)
-
Skogsdata 2022. Tema: Den formellt skyddade skogen
- 2022
-
Reports (other academic/artistic)abstract
- SLU Riksskogstaxeringen samlar årligen in data i skog och mark i Sverige som underlag för Sveriges officiella statistik om ”Skogarnas tillstånd och förändring”. Riksskogstaxeringen påbörjades redan 1923 och har sedan dess utvecklats såväl avseende vilka geografiska områden som ingår i inventeringen, som vad som inventeras. Från och med år 2003 inkluderades formellt skyddade områden inom nationalparker och naturreservat i fältinventeringen och från och med 2016 även de delar av fjällområdet som kan förväntas innehålla trädvegetation. Genom att utnyttja Naturvårdsverkets digitala georefererade information om gränser för formellt skyddade områden kan vi nu beskriva karaktärer och egenskaper för Sveriges formellt skyddade skogsmark. SCB publicerar årligen officiell statistik avseende arealer formellt skyddad skog i Sverige (SCB 2021). I detta temanummer fokuserar vi därför på att beskriva hur dessa arealer fördelas på olika egenskaper samt kvantifierar och beskriver egenskaper för virkesförråd, tillväxt och naturlig avgång. Vi jämför även tillstånd och egenskaper för skog inom formellt skyddade områden med övrig skog.
|
|
| 5. |
- Araza, Arnan, et al.
(author)
-
Past decade above-ground biomass change comparisons from four multi-temporal global maps
- 2023
-
In: International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. - 1569-8432. ; 118
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Above-ground biomass (AGB) is considered an essential climate variable that underpins our knowledge and information about the role of forests in mitigating climate change. The availability of satellite-based AGB and AGB change (ΔAGB) products has increased in recent years. Here we assessed the past decade net ΔAGB derived from four recent global multi-date AGB maps: ESA-CCI maps, WRI-Flux model, JPL time series, and SMOS-LVOD time series. Our assessments explore and use different reference data sources with biomass re-measurements within the past decade. The reference data comprise National Forest Inventory (NFI) plot data, local ΔAGB maps from airborne LiDAR, and selected Forest Resource Assessment country data from countries with well-developed monitoring capacities. Map to reference data comparisons were performed at levels ranging from 100 m to 25 km spatial scale. The comparisons revealed that LiDAR data compared most reasonably with the maps, while the comparisons using NFI only showed some agreements at aggregation levels <10 km. Regardless of the aggregation level, AGB losses and gains according to the map comparisons were consistently smaller than the reference data. Map-map comparisons at 25 km highlighted that the maps consistently captured AGB losses in known deforestation hotspots. The comparisons also identified several carbon sink regions consistently detected by all maps. However, disagreement between maps is still large in key forest regions such as the Amazon basin. The overall ΔAGB map cross-correlation between maps varied in the range 0.11–0.29 (r). Reported ΔAGB magnitudes were largest in the high-resolution datasets including the CCI map differencing (stock change) and Flux model (gain-loss) methods, while they were smallest according to the coarser-resolution LVOD and JPL time series products, especially for AGB gains. Our results suggest that ΔAGB assessed from current maps can be biased and any use of the estimates should take that into account. Currently, ΔAGB reference data are sparse especially in the tropics but that deficit can be alleviated by upcoming LiDAR data networks in the context of Supersites and GEO-Trees.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Ellison, David, et al.
(author)
-
Harvested area did not increase abruptly—how advancements in satellite-based mapping led to erroneous conclusions
- 2022
-
In: Annals of Forest Science. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1286-4560 .- 1297-966X. ; 79
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Key message: Using satellite-based maps, Ceccherini et al. (Nature 583:72-77, 2020) report abruptly increasing harvested area estimates in several EU countries beginning in 2015. Using more than 120,000 National Forest Inventory observations to analyze the satellite-based map, we show that it is not harvested area but the map's ability to detect harvested areas that abruptly increases after 2015 in Finland and Sweden.
|
|
| 9. |
- Eriksson, Andreas, et al.
(author)
-
Availability and mobilization of forest resources in Sweden
- 2024
-
In: European Journal of Forest Research. - 1612-4669 .- 1612-4677. ; 73, s. 703–712-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The available amount of wood supply is essential for national strategic planning and evaluation of forestry in Sweden. Since Sweden holds a large part of the forests in the European Union and plays a significant role in the global trade of wood-based products, a precise estimate of the potential of the Swedish forest resource is also important in regional and global outlook studies. In this study, we analyse factors influencing the availability and mobilization of wood supply. By comparing data from the Swedish National Forest Inventory with the stand registers of the five largest forest owners in Sweden, we estimate the productive forest area not included in the forest owners' stand databases. Our results show that 0.4 million hectares, or 5% of these large-scale forest owners productive forest area, is outside their stand registers and therefore neither included in their long-term harvesting plans nor in their nature conservation plans. For small-scale forest owners, we analyse the final felling rate during 2004-2020 using satellite imagery to estimate the proportion of properties that abstain from final fellings and thereby could affect the potential mobilization of wood supply. During this period, 32% of the forest properties owned by small-scale forest owners have not done any final felling. These forest estates hold in total 1.1 million hectares of productive forest land or 9% of the area owned by small-scale forest owners. This implies a gap between the potential and realistic estimates for Forest Available for Wood Supply.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
