| 1. |
- Gogniat, Emiliano, et al.
(author)
-
Dead space analysis at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients
- 2018
-
In: Journal of critical care. - : W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC. - 0883-9441 .- 1557-8615. ; 45, s. 231-238
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To analyze the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on Bohr's dead space (VDBohr/VT) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).Material and methods: Fourteen ARDS patients under lung protective ventilation settingswere submitted to 4 different levels of PEEP (0, 6, 10, 16 cmH(2)O). Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics and volumetric capnography were recorded at each protocol step.Results: Two groups of patients responded differently to PEEP when comparing baseline with 16-PEEP: those in which driving pressure increased > 15% (Delta P.(15%), n = 7, p = .016) and those in which the change was <= 15% (Delta P-<= 15%, n = 7, p = .700). VDBohr/VT was higher in Delta P-<= 15% than in Delta P-<= 15% patients at baseline ventilation [0.58 (0.49-0.60) vs 0.46 (0.43-0.46) p = .018], at 0-PEEP [0.50 (0.47-0.54) vs 0.41 (0.40-0.43) p = .012], at 6-PEEP [0.55 (0.49-0.57) vs 0.44 (0.42-0.45) p = .008], at 10-PEEP [0.59 (0.51-0.59) vs 0.45 (0.44-0.46) p = .006] and at 16-PEEP [0.61 (0.56-0.65) vs 0.47 (0.45-0.48) p =. 001]. We found a good correlation between Delta P and VDBohr/VT only in the Delta P.(15%) group (r = 0.74, p < .001).Conclusions: Increases in PEEP result in higher VDBohr/VT only when associated with an increase in driving pressure.
|
|
| 2. |
- Tusman, Gerardo, et al.
(author)
-
Reference values for volumetric capnography-derived non-invasive parameters in healthy individuals
- 2013
-
In: Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1387-1307 .- 1573-2614. ; 27:3, s. 281-288
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim of this study was to determine typical values for non-invasive volumetric capnography (VCap) parameters for healthy volunteers and anesthetized individuals. VCap was obtained by a capnograph connected to the airway opening. We prospectively studied 33 healthy volunteers 32 +/- A 6 years of age weighing 70 +/- A 13 kg at a height of 171 +/- A 11 cm in the supine position. Data from these volunteers were compared with a cohort of similar healthy anesthetized patients ventilated with the following settings: tidal volume (VT) of 6-8 mL/kg, respiratory rate 10-15 bpm, PEEP of 5-6 cmH(2)O and FiO(2) of 0.5. Volunteers showed better clearance of CO2 compared to anesthetized patients as indicated by (median and interquartile range): (1) an increased elimination of CO2 per mL of VT of 0.028 (0.005) in volunteers versus 0.023 (0.003) in anesthetized patients, p < 0.05; (2) a lower normalized slope of phase III of 0.26 (0.17) in volunteers versus 0.39 (0.38) in anesthetized patients, p < 0.05; and (3) a lower Bohr dead space ratio of 0.23 (0.05) in volunteers versus 0.28 (0.05) in anesthetized patients, p < 0.05. This study presents reference values for non-invasive volumetric capnography-derived parameters in healthy individuals. Mechanical ventilation and anesthesia altered these values significantly.
|
|
