| 1. |
- Glimberg, Ida, et al.
(author)
-
The prevalence of celiac disease in women with infertility - A systematic review with meta-analysis
- 2021
-
In: Reproductive Medicine and Biology. - : Wiley. - 1445-5781 .- 1447-0578. ; 20:2, s. 224-233
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To determine the prevalence of celiac disease in infertile women.Methods: A systematic search of four databases was conducted up until February 6, 2020. The search terms "c(o)eliac disease", "gluten", "vill(o)us atrophy", "infertility" and "subfertility" yielded 1142 unique hits. Articles in other languages than English, conference abstracts, letters, and publications where relevant information was missing were excluded. In our main analysis, celiac disease had to be verified by duodenal biopsy. The titles and abstracts, and the full-text articles were independently reviewed by two researchers. A fixed-effect model was used to calculate the weighted prevalence.Results: Based on 11 studies (1617 women), the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.7% (95% CI = 0.2%-1.2%) in women with any infertility. Restricting our study population to women with unexplained infertility, the pooled prevalence of biopsy-confirmed celiac disease was 0.6% (95% CI = 0.0%-1.6%). When including studies where celiac disease had been defined per serology (20 studies; 5158 women), the pooled prevalence of celiac disease was 1.1% (95% CI = 0.6%-1.6%) in women with any infertility.Conclusion: Our results indicate that celiac disease is not more common in infertile women than in the general population. Celiac screening in infertile women may have low yield.
|
|
| 2. |
- Haggård, Linnea, et al.
(author)
-
High prevalence of celiac disease in autoimmune hepatitis : Systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2021
-
In: Liver international (Print). - : Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Inc.. - 1478-3223 .- 1478-3231. ; 41:11, s. 2693-2702
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in individuals with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) have shown highly variable results. We therefore aimed to examine the prevalence of CD in individuals with AIH.METHODS: Two professional librarians searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane and Web of Science Core Collection up until 7 February 2020. The search terms included 'celiac disease', 'celiac', 'transglutaminases', 'gluten', 'gliadin', 'EMA', 'TTG' and 'villous' combined with 'autoimmune', 'hepatitis', 'ANA', 'SMA' and 'LKM'. This search yielded 2419 unique publications. A systematic review based on the PRISMA guidelines resulted in 31 articles eligible for full text review. Fifteen articles were deemed relevant, with 8 being included in our main analysis. A fixed-effect inverse variance-weighted model was used, and heterogeneity was calculated.RESULTS: Our main analysis included 567 individuals with AIH from eight studies, where biopsy-verified CD (equivalent to Marsh III) was seen in 23 individuals (4.1%). The pooled prevalence of CD in AIH was 3.5% (95% CI = 1.6%-5.3%) (heterogeneity: P = .874; I2 = 0.0%), which is clearly higher than the 1% CD seen in most general populations. When also including studies where CD had been diagnosed through positive serology without biopsy (15 studies: n = 1817 individuals with AIH), the pooled prevalence of CD was 2.9% (95% CI = 2.1%-3.8%) (heterogeneity: P < .001; I2 = 66.8%).CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a higher prevalence of CD in individuals with AIH compared to the general population. CD screening may be considered in patients with AIH.
|
|
| 3. |
- Röjler, Lovisa, 1983-, et al.
(author)
-
Validation of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis based on histopathology reports in Sweden
- 2021
-
In: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. - : Upsala Medical Society. - 0300-9734 .- 2000-1967. ; 126:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a relatively new diagnosis, where until recently a specific international classification of disease code was missing. One way to identify patients with EoE is to use histopathology codes. We validated the clinicopathological EoE diagnosis based on histopathology reports and patient charts to establish these data sources as the basis for a nationwide EoE patient cohort.Methods: Through the Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden (ESPRESSO) study, we randomly selected 165 patients from five Swedish health care regions with a histopathologic diagnosis of EoE. Patients were assigned a histopathology diagnosis of EoE if they had >= 15 eosinophils per high-power field or, in the absence of eosinophil quantification, the pathologist interpreted the biopsy as consistent with EoE. Patient charts were scrutinized to see if the other diagnostic criteria were fulfilled. Of the 131 received patient charts, 111 (85%) had sufficient information to be included in the study.Results: Of the 111 validated patients, 99 had EoE, corresponding to a positive predictive value of 89% (95% confidence interval = 82-94%). Dysphagia was the most common symptom (n = 78, 70%), followed by food impaction (n = 64, 58%) and feeding difficulties (n = 37, 33%). Twelve patients had coexisting asthma (11%) and 16 allergic rhinitis (14%). Seventeen patients underwent esophageal dilatation (15%), of which seven had more than one dilatation. Ninety-seven (87%) patients had a proton-pump inhibitor treatment <= 2 years before or after the diagnosis. Forty-two patients (38%) had been prescribed inhalation steroids and 64 (58%) had undergone esophageal radiology.Conclusion: Histopathology reports from the ESPRESSO cohort with esophageal eosinophilic inflammation are suggestive of EoE.
|
|
