| 1. |
- Dantonello, Tobias M, et al.
(author)
-
Cooperative trial CWS-91 for localized soft tissue sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults.
- 2009
-
In: Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 1527-7755. ; 27:9, s. 1446-55
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PURPOSE: To improve risk-adapted therapy for localized childhood soft tissue sarcoma within an international multicenter setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred forty-one patients younger than 21 years with localized rhabdomyosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma-like tumors (ie, extraosseous tumors of the Ewing family, synovial sarcoma, and undifferentiated sarcoma) were eligible. Therapy was stratified according to postsurgical stage, histology, and tumor site. In unresectable tumors, treatment was further adapted depending on response to induction chemotherapy, TN classification, tumor size and second-look surgery. A novel five-drug combination of etoposide, vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin (EVAIA) was evaluated for high-risk patients, but cumulative chemotherapy dosage and treatment duration were reduced for the remaining individuals as compared with that of the previous trial CWS-86. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (HART) was recommended at doses of either 32 or 48 Gy. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 8 years, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall (OS) survival for the entire cohort was 63% +/- 4% and 73% +/- 4%, respectively (all survival rates in this abstract are calculated and displayed with +/-95% CI). EFS/OS rates by histology were 60% +/- 5%/72% +/- 5% in rhabdomyosarcoma, 62% +/- 10%/69% +/- 10% for Ewing tumors of soft tissues, 84% +/- 12%/90% +/- 10% for synovial sarcoma, and 67% +/- 38%/83% +/- 30% for undifferentiated sarcoma, respectively. Response to one cycle of the five-drug combination EVAIA was similar to that of the four-drug combination VAIA used in CWS-86. Two hundred twelve patients with rhabdomyosarcoma underwent radiation (EFS, 66% +/- 6%); 53 of those patients had a favorable risk profile and received 32 Gy of HART (EFS, 73% +/- 12%). TN classification, tumor site, tumor size, histology, and age were prognostic in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Improved risk stratification enabled decreased therapy intensity for selected patients without compromising survival. Intensified chemotherapy with EVAIA did not improve outcome of localized high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma.
|
|
| 2. |
- Tramsen, Lars, et al.
(author)
-
Pediatric Patients with Stage IV Rhabdomyosarcoma Significantly Benefit from Long-Term Maintenance Therapy : Results of the CWS-IV 2002 and the CWS DOK IV 2004-Trials
- 2023
-
In: Cancers. - : MDPI. - 2072-6694. ; 15:7
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in childhood. Whereas more than 90% of patients with localized low-risk RMS can be cured, metastatic RMS have a dismal outcome, with survival rates of less than 30%. The HD CWS-96 trial showed an improved outcome for patients receiving maintenance therapy after completing intensive chemotherapy. Consequently, the international clinical trials CWS-IV 2002 and CWS DOK IV 2004 on metastatic disease of STS of the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) were designed in addition to the CWS-2002P trial for localized RMS disease. All patients received a multimodal intensive treatment regimen. To maintain remission, three options were compared: long-term maintenance therapy (LTMT) versus allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) versus high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). A total of 176 pediatric patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of metastatic RMS or RMS-like tumor were included. A total of 89 patients receiving LTML showed a significantly better outcome, with an event-free survival (EFS) of 41% and an overall survival (OS) of 53%, than alloHSCT (n = 21, EFS 19%, p = 0.02, OS 24%, p = 0.002). The outcome of LTML was slightly improved compared to HDCT (n = 13, EFS 35%, OS 34%). In conclusion, our data suggest that in patients suffering from metastatic RMS, long-term maintenance therapy is a superior strategy in terms of EFS and OS compared to alloHSCT. EFS and OS of HDCT are similar in these strategies; however, the therapeutic burden of LTMT is much lower.
|
|
