| 1. |
- Rivasi, Giulia, et al.
(author)
-
AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING : A NEW DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH FOR DETECTION OF HYPOTENSION IN REFLEX SYNCOPE (SYNABPM 1 STUDY)
- 2022
-
In: Journal of Hypertension. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1473-5598 .- 0263-6352. ; 40:Suppl 1, s. 10-10
-
Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking. We hypothesized that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM. DESIGN AND METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis comparing ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24-hour SBP, age, sex and hypertension. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, predominant cardioinhibition or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and night-time SBP drops (<110, 100, 90, 80 mmHg) were assessed. Hypotensive susceptibility was defined likely or possible for cut-offs achieving the highest sensitivity among those with specificity > 90% and 80-90%, respectively. Findings were validated in an independent sample. RESULTS: In the Derivation cohort, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drop < 90 mmHg provided the best diagnostic yield (91% specificity, 32% sensitivity, Odds Ratio [OR] = 4.6, p = 0.001). Two or more-daytime drops < 100 mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR = 3.5, p = 0.001). Results were confirmed in the Validation cohort: one or more daytime SBP drop < 90 mmHg provided 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR = 6.2, p < 0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops < 100 mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR = 3.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rivasi, Giulia, et al.
(author)
-
Association between hypotension during 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and reflex syncope : the SynABPM 1 study
- 2022
-
In: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1522-9645 .- 0195-668X. ; 43:38, s. 3765-3776
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- AIMS: Diagnostic criteria for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients with suspected reflex syncope are lacking. The study hypothesis was that patients with reflex syncope have a higher prevalence of systolic blood pressure (SBP) drops on ABPM.METHODS AND RESULTS: ABPM data from reflex syncope patients and controls, matched by average 24 h SBP, age, sex, and hypertension were compared. Patients with constitutional hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, and predominant cardioinhibition during carotid sinus massage or prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring or competing causes of syncope were excluded. Daytime and nighttime SBP drops (<110, 100, 90, 80 mmHg) were assessed. Findings were validated in an independent sample. In the derivation sample, daytime SBP drops were significantly more common in 158 syncope patients than 329 controls. One or more daytime drops <90 mmHg achieved 91% specificity and 32% sensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 4.6, P < 0.001]. Two or more daytime drops <100 mmHg achieved 84% specificity and 40% sensitivity (OR 3.5, P = 0.001). Results were confirmed in the validation sample of 164 syncope patients and 164 controls: one or more daytime SBP drops <90 mmHg achieved 94% specificity and 29% sensitivity (OR 6.2, P < 0.001), while two or more daytime SBP drops <100 mmHg achieved 83% specificity and 35% sensitivity (OR 2.6, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: SBP drops during ABPM are more common in reflex syncope patients than in controls. Cut-off values that may be applied in clinical practice are defined. This study expands the current indications for ABPM to patients with reflex syncope.
|
|
| 3. |
- Brignole, Michele, et al.
(author)
-
The Rate of Asystolic Reflex Syncope Is Not Influenced by Age
- 2024
-
In: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. - 2405-5018. ; 10:3, s. 566-574
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The head-up tilt test (HUT) and other evidence suggest that the vagal effect on the heart decreases with age.OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to assess whether this age effect also affects the rate of asystole in spontaneous reflex syncope (RS).METHOD: We performed an analysis of pooled individual data from 4 studies that recruited patients ≥40 years of age affected by certain or suspected RS who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) and reported follow-up data on syncope recurrence. We assessed the presence of asystolic syncope of >3 seconds or nonsyncopal asystole of >6 seconds recorded by ILR and compared the findings to tilt test results on the same patients.RESULTS: A total of 1,046 patients received ILR because of unexplained syncope. Of these, 201 (19.2%) had a documentation of an asystolic event of 10-second (Q1-Q3: 6- to 15-second) duration. They were subdivided in 3 age tertiles: ≤60 years (n = 64), 61 to 72 years (n = 72), and ≥73 years (n = 65). The rate of asystolic events was similar in the 3 subgroups (50.1%, 50.1%, and 49.2%, respectively; P = 0.99). Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced during HUT (performed in 169 of 201) was greatly age dependent (31.0%, 12.1%, and 11.1% in increasing age tertiles, respectively; P = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: The rate of the spontaneous asystolic form of RS documented by ILR is constant at any age >40 years. Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced by HUT is higher in younger patients and decreases with age. The contrasting results between spontaneous and tilt-induced events cast doubt on the concept that asystole in RS is less common in older patients.
|
|
