SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Hasselman Fred) "

Search: WFRF:(Hasselman Fred)

  • Result 1-3 of 3
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Anderson, Christopher J., et al. (author)
  • Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
  • 2016
  • In: Science. - : American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). - 0036-8075 .- 1095-9203. ; 351:6277
  • Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
    • Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
  •  
2.
  • Klein, Richard A., et al. (author)
  • Many Labs 2 : Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings
  • 2018
  • In: Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. - : SAGE Publications. - 2515-2459 .- 2515-2467. ; 1:4, s. 443-490
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely high-powered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied.
  •  
3.
  • Lakens, Daniel, et al. (author)
  • Justify your alpha
  • 2018
  • In: Nature Human Behaviour. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 2397-3374. ; 2:3, s. 168-171
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • In response to recommendations to redefine statistical significance to P ≤ 0.005, we propose that researchers should transparently report and justify all choices they make when designing a study, including the alpha level.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-3 of 3
Type of publication
journal article (3)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (2)
other academic/artistic (1)
Author/Editor
Hasselman, Fred (3)
Grange, James A. (2)
Spies, Jeffrey R. (2)
van Assen, Marcel A. ... (2)
Vianello, Michelange ... (2)
Kenny, David A. (1)
show more...
Johansson, Christer (1)
Nilsonne, Gustav (1)
Albers, Casper J. (1)
Jonas, Kai J. (1)
Munafò, Marcus R. (1)
Nosek, Brian A. (1)
Ingre, Michael (1)
Danielsson, Henrik (1)
Innes-Ker, Åse (1)
Anderson, Christophe ... (1)
Bahník, Štěpán (1)
Barnett-Cowan, Micha ... (1)
Bosco, Frank A. (1)
Chandler, Jesse (1)
Chartier, Christophe ... (1)
Cheung, Felix (1)
Christopherson, Cody ... (1)
Cordes, Andreas (1)
Cremata, Edward J. (1)
Della Penna, Nicolas (1)
Estel, Vivien (1)
Fedor, Anna (1)
Fitneva, Stanka A. (1)
Frank, Michael C. (1)
Hartshorne, Joshua K ... (1)
Henninger, Felix (1)
van der Hulst, Marij ... (1)
Lai, Calvin K. (1)
Levitan, Carmel A. (1)
Miller, Jeremy K. (1)
Moore, Katherine S. (1)
Meixner, Johannes M. (1)
Neijenhuijs, Koen I. (1)
Plessow, Franziska (1)
Prenoveau, Jason M. (1)
Ricker, Ashley A. (1)
Schmidt, Kathleen (1)
Stieger, Stefan (1)
Strohminger, Nina (1)
Sullivan, Gavin B. (1)
van Aert, Robbie C. ... (1)
Vanpaemel, Wolf (1)
Voracek, Martin (1)
Zuni, Kellylynn (1)
show less...
University
Stockholm University (2)
Karolinska Institutet (2)
Linköping University (1)
Lund University (1)
Linnaeus University (1)
Language
English (3)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Social Sciences (3)
Natural sciences (1)
Medical and Health Sciences (1)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view