| 1. |
- Tabiri, S, et al.
(author)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 2. |
- Bravo, L, et al.
(author)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 3. |
- Thomas, HS, et al.
(author)
-
- 2019
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Edgecock, T. R., et al.
(author)
-
High intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe
- 2013
-
In: Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. - : American Physical Society. - 1098-4402. ; 16:2, s. 021002-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The EUROnu project has studied three possible options for future, high intensity neutrino oscillation facilities in Europe. The first is a Super Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of pions created by bombarding targets with a 4 MW proton beam from the CERN High Power Superconducting Proton Linac. The far detector for this facility is the 500 kt MEMPHYS water Cherenkov, located in the Frejus tunnel. The second facility is the Neutrino Factory, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of mu(+) and mu(-) beams in a storage ring. The far detector in this case is a 100 kt magnetized iron neutrino detector at a baseline of 2000 km. The third option is a Beta Beam, in which the neutrinos come from the decay of beta emitting isotopes, in particular He-6 and Ne-18, also stored in a ring. The far detector is also the MEMPHYS detector in the Frejus tunnel. EUROnu has undertaken conceptual designs of these facilities and studied the performance of the detectors. Based on this, it has determined the physics reach of each facility, in particular for the measurement of CP violation in the lepton sector, and estimated the cost of construction. These have demonstrated that the best facility to build is the Neutrino Factory. However, if a powerful proton driver is constructed for another purpose or if the MEMPHYS detector is built for astroparticle physics, the Super Beam also becomes very attractive.
|
|
| 7. |
- Enocson, A. G, et al.
(author)
-
Signal intensity of MR-images of thigh muscles following acute open- and closed chain kinetic knee extensor exercise – index of muscle use
- 2005
-
In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1439-6319 .- 1439-6327. ; 94:4, s. 357-363
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Exercise-induced shifts in signal intensity (SI) of magnetic resonance (MR) images were examined to assess indirectly muscle use in closed- and open-chain knee extensor exercises. Eight men performed five sets of 8–12 repetitions in the leg press (LP) and the seated knee extension (KE) exercises at 50, 75 and 100%, respectively of the 5·10 repetition maximum (RM) load. Prior to exercise and after each load setting, images of the thigh were obtained. The increase in SI (D SI) of the quadriceps at 100% load was greater (P<0.05) after KE (32.1±9.0%) than after LP (21.9±9.2%). Regardless of load, the four individual muscles of the quadriceps showed similar changes in SI after LP. The three vastii muscles showed comparable increases in SI after KE. M. rectus femoris showed greater (P<0.05) D SI than the vastii muscles at 100%. Neither exercise produced increase in SI of mm. semimembranosus, semitendinosus, gracilis or biceps femoris. Mm. adductor magnus and longus showed increased (13.3±6.5%; P<0.05) SI after LP, but not after KE, at 100% load. The present data also infer greater involvement of the quadriceps muscle in the open-chain knee extension than in the closedchain leg press exercise. The results of the current investigation also indicate similar over-all use among the three vastii muscles in LP and KE, but ifferential m. rectus femoris use between the two exercises. This report extends the merits of the MR imaging technique as an aid to study individual muscle involvement in a particular exercise task.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Einarsdottir, H, et al.
(author)
-
MR imaging of lipoma and liposarcoma
- 1999
-
In: Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987). - : SAGE Publications. - 0284-1851 .- 1600-0455. ; 40:1, s. 64-68
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: To evaluate whether lipoma, atypical lipomatous tumors, and lipo-sarcomas can be differentiated by MR images. Material and Methods: The MR images of 59 lipomatous lesions and liposarcomas were retrospectively reviewed. Apart from size, surgical site, location and margins, the percentage of fat of the tumor volume was assessed as none, 1-75%, 75-95%, or 95-100%. Results: None of the 18 liposarcomas contained fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. The 3 atypical lipomatous tumors all contained fat but less than 75% of the tumor volume. In 32 of 38 ordinary lipomas, the percentage of fat was 95-100%, and in 4 less than 95% of the tumor volume. Two lipomas did not contain fat that could be recognized by MR imaging. Conclusion: A lesion which predominantly has a fat signal is, in all probability, an ordinary lipoma. Lesions with less fat, but still mostly fatty, may either be lipoma or atypical lipomatous tumor. In this group, the discrimination between these two entities cannot be based upon imaging features. In the absence of a fat signal, liposarcoma or lipoma cannot be differentiated from other soft tissue tumors.
|
|
