SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Johannesson Johan) "

Search: WFRF:(Johannesson Johan)

  • Result 1-10 of 87
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Joppe, Marion, et al. (author)
  • Professionalism
  • 2022
  • In: Teaching Tourism : Innovative, Values-based Learning Experiences for Transformative Practices - Innovative, Values-based Learning Experiences for Transformative Practices. - : Edward Elgar Publishing. - 9781800374553 - 9781800374560 ; , s. 107-114
  • Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
  •  
2.
  • Landahl, Jonas, 1986, et al. (author)
  • Using product and manufacturing system platforms to generate producible product variants
  • 2016
  • In: Procedia CIRP. - : Elsevier BV. - 2212-8271. ; 44, s. 61-66
  • Conference paper (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Product platforms have proven efficient as a means to reduce lead-time and increase product quality simultaneously. When using platforms to generate a family of products, the number of variants that need to be managed in manufacturing increases. To succeed with this, the manufacturing system needs to be maintained in a similar level of flexibility as the product platform. However, there is seldom a joint decision behind each and every conceptual product variant during development, regarding capability in manufacturing. For example, when considering producibility, some product variants require better tolerances than what the manufacturing processes can deliver. This uncertainty can be reduced, by making producibility analyses of a set of conceptual product variants. By performing several different analyses, knowledge can be gained, and joint decisions can be made about cross product-manufacturing aspects. The activities can be systematically arranged to gradually eliminate unfeasible conceptual product variants. In this paper we show how an integrated PLM architecture can be used to create sufficient knowledge as a basis for joint product and manufacturing decisions. The utmost company benefit of this is to reduce lead-time by taking manufacturing capability into account when developing product families.
  •  
3.
  • Aspberg, Johan, et al. (author)
  • Intraocular Pressure Lowering Effect of Latanoprost as First-line Treatment for Glaucoma
  • 2018
  • In: Journal of glaucoma. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1057-0829 .- 1536-481X. ; 27:11, s. 976-980
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) - reducing effect of latanoprost in treatment-naïve patients with newly detected open-angle glaucoma with no restriction of the level of untreated IOP.METHODS: Eighty-six patients (105 eyes) with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma received IOP-lowering therapy with latanoprost. The IOP reduction 1 and 3 months after initiation of treatment was recorded.RESULTS: Mean untreated IOP for all eyes was 26.2 mm Hg (ranging from 10 to 51 mm Hg). The mean pressure reduction was 7.9 mm Hg (28%), with equivalent average levels at 1 and 3 months. The reduction in IOP ranged from -2.3 to 25.3 mm Hg after 1 month, and from -1.3 to 33.3 mm Hg after 3 months. The pressure-lowering effect was considerably more pronounced in eyes with higher untreated IOP; the reduction increased by 0.55 mm Hg per mm Hg higher untreated IOP. Four eyes, with untreated IOP within statistically normal limits, had no or negative IOP-reduction. A regression model predicted that IOP reduction ended at untreated IOP≤16 mm Hg. Multiple regression analysis showed that an additional IOP-lowering effect of 1.28 mm Hg was achieved in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to report the IOP-reducing effect of latanoprost treatment at all untreated IOP levels in newly detected glaucoma patients. The effect was proportional to the untreated IOP at all levels above 16 mm Hg and better at higher untreated IOP levels, also in relative terms. Our results further confirm the indication of latanoprost as a first-line therapy for glaucoma.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Bahmanyar, Shahram, et al. (author)
  • Cystic fibrosis gene mutations and gastrointestinal diseases
  • 2010
  • In: Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. - : Elsevier BV. - 1569-1993 .- 1873-5010. ; 9:4, s. 288-291
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: This study examined if CF mutation heterozygosity is associated with diseases of gastrointestinal epithelial barrier function. Design and methods: Swedish registers identified 865 patients with a diagnosis of CF between 1968 and 2003 and matched with 8101 individuals without CF. Gastrointestinal disease risk was examined among 1534 biological parents and 1396 siblings of CF patients, compared with 15,526 parents and 15,542 siblings of individuals without CF. Results: First-degree relatives of CF patients were not at lower risk of the gastrointestinal diseases, in contrast with a raised risk among CF patients. Conclusion: Heterozygosity for CF gene mutations does not protect against gastrointestinal diseases where impaired barrier function may be relevant. (C) 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
  •  
8.
  • Bengtsson, Boel, et al. (author)
  • The glaucoma intensive treatment study : interim results from an ongoing longitudinal randomized clinical trial
  • 2022
  • In: Acta Ophthalmologica. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1755-375X .- 1755-3768. ; 100:2, s. e455-e462
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the perimetric rate of glaucoma progression in the ongoing Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) after 3 years of follow-up.Design: This is a randomized, two-centre, prospective open-labelled treatment trial for open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Participants The participants of this study were treatment-naive patients with newly diagnosed OAG, aged 46-78 years, with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss scheduled to be followed for 5 years within the study.Methods: Patients were randomized to initial treatment with either topical monotherapy or with an intensive approach using drugs from three different classes, plus 360 degrees laser trabeculoplasty. Changes in treatment were allowed. Standard automated perimetry and tonometry were performed and side-effects documented. All results are presented using intention-to-treat analysis.Results: A total of 242 patients were randomized. After 3 years of follow-up, eight patients were lost to follow-up, six of whom were deceased. The median untreated baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24 mmHg in both arms. The median IOP was almost constant over the 3 years of follow-up: approximate to 17 mmHg in the mono-arm and approximate to 14 mmHg in the multi-treatment arm. Treatment was intensified in 42% of the mono-treated patients and in 7% of the multi-treated patients. Treatment was reduced in 13% of the multi-treated patients. The median perimetric rate of progression was -0.5%/year in the mono-treated group and -0.1%/year in the multi-treated group (p = 0.03).Conclusion: The rate of disease progression was significantly slower in the multi-treated patients than in the mono-treated patients. Further follow-up will show whether this difference is sustained over time.
  •  
9.
  • Bengtsson, Boel, et al. (author)
  • The glaucoma intensive treatment study (GITS) : a randomized controlled trial comparing intensive and standard treatment on 5 years visual field development
  • 2024
  • In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. - : Elsevier. - 0002-9394 .- 1879-1891. ; 266, s. 274-288
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • PURPOSE: To assess the effect of an intensive initial intraocular pressure (IOP)–lowering treatment strategy on the progression of visual field damage. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, open-label, 2-center clinical trial.METHODS: A total of 242 patients with newly detected early or moderate untreated open-angle glaucoma were enrolled at 2 university hospitals in Sweden. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either initial treatment with intensive IOP-lowering medications followed by 360° laser trabeculoplasty (LTP), or to traditional mono-therapy, which was increased when deemed necessary. The primary study outcome of interest was the predicted remaining visual field, as measured by the visual field index (VFI) at projected end of life.RESULTS: The median untreated IOP was 24 mm Hg in both treatment groups. During follow-up, median and mode IOP were 17 mm Hg in the mono- and 14 mm Hg in the multi-treatment group. In the mono-treatment group, the median VFI at projected end of life was 79.3% and in the multi-treatment group 87.1% (P =.15). The annual rate of progression of visual field damage was faster in mono-treatment than in multi-treatment participants; median losses per year were 0.65 and 0.25 percentage units, respectively (P =.09). Progression events occurred in 21% of the mono- and in 11% of the multi-treatment participants (P =.03). Adverse events, mostly mild, were reported in 25% of the mono- and in 36% of the multi-treatment participants. Differences in visual field outcomes between treatment groups were more pronounced in participants having higher baseline IOP, defined by median split of untreated IOP values.CONCLUSIONS: In the overall analysis, the visual field outcomes were not overwhelmingly better in the multi-treatment group, but post hoc analysis showed definite benefit in patients with higher untreated IOP. Based on the results of this study, initial intensive treatment may be considered in glaucoma patients with high untreated IOP at diagnosis, although we found no evidence that multi-therapy should be given routinely to all glaucoma patients.
  •  
10.
  • Bengtsson, Boel, et al. (author)
  • The Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS), a randomized clinical trial : design, methodology and baseline data
  • 2018
  • In: Acta Ophthalmologica. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1755-375X .- 1755-3768. ; 96:6, s. 557-566
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Purpose: The primary objective of the ongoing Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) is to evaluate the effectiveness of immediate intensive treatment in comparison with the commonly recommended stepped regimen on the predicted visual field. The two treatment arms are also being compared regarding quality of life (QoL), intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, frequency of reported side‐effects, adverse events and adherence to prescribed treatment.Design: A randomized, two‐centre, prospective open‐labelled treatment trial for open‐angle glaucoma.Participants: Individuals aged 40–78 years with previously untreated and newly diagnosed glaucoma with early to moderate visual field loss were eligible.Methods: Patients were randomized to initial treatment either using drug monotherapy in accordance with common glaucoma guidelines or using a more intensive approach including eyedrops containing drugs from three different classes combined with 360° laser trabeculoplasty. The patients are to be followed for 5 years at visits including standard automated perimetry, optical coherence tomography (OPT) and tonometry. Change of treatment is allowed and decided upon jointly with the patient as in conventional glaucoma management.Main outcome: The estimated predicted preserved visual field and QoL at end of expected lifetime.Results: A total of 242 patients, 45% females, mean age 68 years, were randomized. The median untreated IOP was 24 mm Hg, and the median visual field index (VFI), indicating the percentage of a full field, was 92%.Conclusion: Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study is a clinical trial in which two groups of patients randomized to different initial intensities of IOP‐reducing treatment are being compared with regard to rate of visual field progression and prediction of serious glaucomatous visual field loss at estimated at end of life.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 87
Type of publication
journal article (63)
conference paper (14)
reports (7)
book chapter (3)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (76)
other academic/artistic (9)
pop. science, debate, etc. (2)
Author/Editor
Johannesson, Kerstin ... (16)
Bengtsson, Boel (8)
Heijl, Anders (8)
Lindén, Christina (8)
Mölne, Johan, 1958 (6)
Olausson, Michael, 1 ... (6)
show more...
Johannesson, Magnus (6)
Diaz-Garcia, César (6)
Brännström, Mats, 19 ... (6)
Dahm-Kähler, Pernill ... (6)
Nilsson, Johan (5)
Panova, Marina, 1973 (4)
Tenje, Maria (4)
Molnár, Peter, 1967 (4)
Boman, Johan, 1955 (4)
Fornell, Anna (4)
Kvarnström, Niclas (4)
Barregård, Lars, 194 ... (4)
Sällsten, Gerd, 1952 (4)
Johannesson, Sandra, ... (4)
Rantala, Outi (3)
Ek, Richard (3)
Munthe, John (3)
Dreber Almenberg, An ... (3)
Johannesson, Björn (3)
Rudan, Igor (3)
Lundin, Stefan, 1953 (3)
Nordin, Annika (3)
Amin, Najaf (3)
Magnusson, Patrik K ... (3)
Zhao, Wei (3)
Vahter, Marie (3)
Lehtimäki, Terho (3)
Gieger, Christian (3)
Boomsma, Dorret I. (3)
Spector, Tim D. (3)
Kaprio, Jaakko (3)
Johannesson, Elias (3)
Waldenström, Ann-Cha ... (3)
Sörlin, Sverker (3)
Malmqvist, Johan, 19 ... (3)
Almenberg, Johan (3)
Metspalu, Andres (3)
Johannesson, Hanna (3)
Rockström, Johan (3)
Ledin, Anna (3)
Eriksson, Johan G. (3)
Schmidt, Reinhold (3)
Schmidt, Helena (3)
Deary, Ian J (3)
show less...
University
University of Gothenburg (34)
Lund University (21)
Uppsala University (15)
Chalmers University of Technology (13)
Umeå University (8)
Royal Institute of Technology (7)
show more...
Karolinska Institutet (7)
Stockholm School of Economics (6)
Stockholm University (3)
University West (2)
Örebro University (2)
Karlstad University (2)
Luleå University of Technology (1)
Halmstad University (1)
Linköping University (1)
Linnaeus University (1)
RISE (1)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (1)
VTI - The Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (1)
show less...
Language
English (82)
Swedish (5)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Natural sciences (38)
Medical and Health Sciences (29)
Engineering and Technology (16)
Social Sciences (10)
Agricultural Sciences (3)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view