1. |
- Bruncevic, Merima, 1981, et al.
(author)
-
Modern immaterialrätt
- 2016
-
Book (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Immaterialrätten är under ständig förändring och boken lyfter därför också fram sådana förändringsprocesser och aktuella exempel. Varje kapitel i boken är indelat i tre nivåer – allmänt, fördjupning och specialisering – vilket gör att läsaren lätt kan anpassa sina studier utifrån förkunskaper och studiemål. Kort sagt, en grundläggande bok för juristutbildningarna i immaterialrätt på universitet och högskola. Den kan också läsas på grund- och fortsättningsnivå inom andra universitetsutbildningar där immaterialrätt ingår, till exempel ingenjörs-, konstnärs-, farmaceut- och ekonomiutbildningar.
|
|
2. |
- Gunnarsson, Åsa, 1958-, et al.
(author)
-
Genusrättsvetenskap
- 2018
-
Book (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Den globala samhällsomvälvande #metoo-rörelsen som pågår i vår tid visar att genusrättsvetenskapens frågor om rätt och kön är centrala. I denna boks upplaga fördjupas ämnet genusrättsvetenskap: ett särskilt forskningsperspektiv på juridiken och ett kunskapsområde inom rättsvetenskapen. I forskningsfältet analyseras rätten och rättsvetenskapen med hjälp av genusrättsvetenskapliga teorier, metoder och begrepp, där kön och genus är de centrala begreppen.
|
|
3. |
- Käll, Jannice, 1985
(author)
-
A Posthuman Data Subject? The Right to Be Forgotten and Beyond
- 2017
-
In: German Law Journal. - 2071-8322. ; 18:5, s. 1145-1162
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The general assumption in the West is that there still is an inherent difference between persons and things. This divide informs how “the human” and human subjectivity are constructed as distinct from all others. Recently, the distinction has been challenged in posthumanist theory, where it has been argued that the divide between human and nonhuman agents—or rather, bodies—is always an effect of a differential set of powers. For this reason, the boundaries between human and nonhuman are always in flux. As posthumanist theorists have argued, this change in boundaries may be specifically visualized in relation to digital technology. Today, such technologies obfuscate the boundaries between persons and things, and the extensive utilization of smartphones, social media, and online search engines are just three common examples. In parallel to the continuous expansion of digital technologies, critical understandings of how “data” and human personhood are produced are increasingly raised in legal theory. Recent developments establishing increased privacy online through EU law, including the new General Data Protection Regulation and the famous Right to Be Forgotten case could possibly be understood to have struck a balance between interests of the human–in the form of privacy—and the digital—in the form of information diffusion. In this Article, a posthumanist theoretical perspective is utilized to show how the new data protection legislation, with a focus on the Right to Be Forgotten, produces such protection yet continuously withdraws data as a separate body from human bodies. For this reason, it is argued that the construction of new human rights, such as those considering data protection, would benefit from understanding how the separation is, in itself, an effect of advanced capitalism.
|
|
4. |
- Käll, Jannice, et al.
(author)
-
Billets
- 2022
-
In: Research Handbook on Law and Literature. - 9781839102257 ; , s. 272-283
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
|
|
5. |
- Käll, Jannice, 1985-
(author)
-
Blockchain Control
- 2018
-
In: Law and Critique. - Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands. - 0957-8536 .- 1572-8617. ; 29:2, s. 133-140
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Blockchain technology is often discussed and theorized in relation to cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. Its quality as a technology that produces advanced encryption keys between objects, however, also makes it interesting to those who seek to connect physical objects to digital elements. The reason for this is that the link between objects needs to be ‘secure’ from undesired external interference. In relation to such interests, blockchain has been identified as a highly attractive technology to support the general digitalization of society towards the Internet of Things, smart cities etc. In extension, the implementation of blockchain technology implies that it may work as a tool that has the capacity to direct which objects may/may not interact with each other. The ‘ledger of everything’ that blockchain may possibly produce as regards the ‘Internet of Everything’ is even suggested to make humans and other intermediary technologies redundant. In this essay, I argue that in order to sustain legal critique when the world moves into the next era of digitalization, we need to understand - and question - how technological control operates through e.g. blockchain technology by locking physical and digital elements to each other. © The Author(s) 2018
|
|
6. |
- Käll, Jannice, 1985
(author)
-
Converging Human and Digital Bodies. Posthumanism, Property, Law.
- 2017
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This thesis elaborates a theory for understanding how advanced capitalism commoditizes knowledge to an intensified degree simultaneously as it undoes the divide between human and nonhuman beings. In the text, such theory visibilizes how human and digital bodies are being produced as increasingly connected in innovation theory and recent business practices. Such increased connectivity between human and digital bodies is here specifically related to an obfuscation of the legal conceptual divides between “the human” and property. It is further suggested that a clouding of the property limit may be understood to challenge the generally assumed exclusivity of “the human” in relation to “things”. The thesis engages in making the convergences between human and digital bodies visible through developing a posthumanist theoretical perspective in law. This development is specifically connected to the recent years’ developments in the field of new materialism(s) and its affiliations to the so-called French readings of the philosopher Baruch Spinoza. The theoretical interest is particularly configured into three tools: body, entanglement, and ethics. These three tools are utilized to visibilize how legal concepts of property are significantly affiliated with two theoretical binaries that are put into question through advanced capitalist practices and digital technologies. The binaries specifically identified and interrogated are: mind/body and person/thing. The concept of the body is here utilized to question the stability of boundaries between human and digital bodies. The porousness of this boundary is particularly visibilized in relation to the production of digital bodies as separate from human bodies. The concept of entanglement further shows how processes of separation are never fully enacted. This is made visible through processes of turning both human and digital bodies into “hybrids” or entangled bodies. The concept of ethics furthermore stresses the importance to continuously move the understanding of matter in a direction where bodies, in a more posthumanist sense, may remain in their being. This implies a focus on radical sustainability that avoids yet cherishes technological encounters. As argued throughout the thesis, this type of ethics may be carried out through a radical opening of property, as well as law in general, in relation to their always-already apparent, yet hidden, materialities. This opening up to matter also further makes possible a rethinking of human subjectivity when human and digital bodies converge.
|
|
7. |
- Käll, Jannice, et al.
(author)
-
Critical posthumanism, justice, and law
- 2022
-
In: Palgrave Handbook of Critical Posthumanism. - Cham : Springer International Publishing. - 9783030426811 ; , s. 629-649
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
- Käll, Jannice, et al.
(author)
-
More-than-human rights to data
- 2024
-
In: Non-Human Rights : Critical Perspectives - Critical Perspectives. - 9781802208528 - 9781802208511 ; , s. 189-205
-
Book chapter (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Digitalization is continuously demanding new, or revitalized, rights. Recently, this can be seen in calls for privacy rights or data subjects’ rights to control ‘their’ data. In parallel to this development, there are also both theoretical and activist developments to expand the notion of rights all together, beyond a human/ist understanding of rights, into ‘more-than-human’ rights. In this chapter, it is outlined what a more-than-human rights concept could entail for data rights. To do so, a Deleuzian-Spinozan idea of rights is explored in connection with new materialist philosophies in general and new materialist media studies in particular. To conclude, it is suggested that a more layered understanding of the different elements producing, and sustaining, data, is needed to invoke more-than-human rights to data.
|
|