2. |
- Thater, Sabine, et al.
(author)
-
Cross-checking SMBH mass estimates in NGC 6958-I. Stellar dynamics from adaptive optics-assisted MUSE observations
- 2022
-
In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0035-8711 .- 1365-2966. ; 509:4, s. 5416-5436
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Supermassive black hole masses (M (BH)) can dynamically be estimated with various methods and using different kinematic tracers. Different methods have only been cross-checked for a small number of galaxies and often show discrepancies. To understand these discrepancies, detailed cross-comparisons of additional galaxies are needed. We present the first part of our cross-comparison between stellar- and gas-based M-BH estimates in the nearby fast-rotating early-type galaxy NGC 6958. The measurements presented here are based on ground-layer adaptive optics-assisted Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer (MUSE) science verification data at around 0."6 spatial resolution. The spatial resolution is a key ingredient for the measurement and we provide a Gaussian parametrization of the adaptive optics-assisted point spread function for various wavelengths. From the MUSE data, we extracted the stellar kinematics and constructed dynamical models. Using an axisymmetric Schwarzschild technique, we measured an M-BH of (3.6(-2.4)(+2.7)) x10(8) M-circle dot at 3 sigma significance taking kinematical and dynamical systematics (e.g. radially varying mass-to-light ratio) into account. We also added a dark halo, but our data do not allow us to constrain the dark matter fraction. Adding dark matter with an abundance matching prior results in a 25 per cent more massive black hole. Jeans anisotropic models return M-BH of (4.6(-2.7)(+2.5)) x10(8) and (8.6(-0.8)(+0.8)) x10(8) M-circle dot at 3 sigma confidence for spherical and cylindrical alignments of the velocity ellipsoid, respectively. In a follow-up study, we will compare the stellar-based M (BH) with those from cold and warm gas tracers, which will provide additional constraints for the M-BH for NGC 6958, and insights into assumptions that lead to potential systematic uncertainty.
|
|