| 1. |
- Boström, Petrus, et al.
(author)
-
Oncological Impact of High Vascular Tie After Surgery for Rectal Cancer : A Nationwide Cohort Study
- 2021
-
In: Annals of Surgery. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 274:3, s. e236-e244
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of tie level on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.Summary background data: Theoretically, a high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery could facilitate removal of apical node metastases and improve tumor staging accuracy. However, no appropriately sized randomized controlled trial exists and results from observational studies are not consistent.Methods: All stage I–III rectal cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with curative intention in 2007 to 2014 were identified and followed, using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary outcome was cancer-specific survival, whereas overall and relative survival, locoregional and distant recurrence, and lymph node harvest were secondary outcomes, with high tie as exposure. We used propensity score matching to emulate a randomized controlled trial, and then performed Cox regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Some 8287 patients remained for analysis, of which 37% had high tie surgery. After propensity score matching, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was overall 86% and we found no association between the level of tie and cancer-specific (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79–1.07) or overall (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89–1.08) survival, nor to locoregional (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59–1.23) or distant (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88–1.15) recurrence, nor to relative survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85–1.28). Stratification and sensitivity analyses were similarly insignificant, after adjustment for confounding. Total lymph node harvest was, however, increased after high tie surgery (P < 0.01), but no differences were seen regarding positive nodes (P = 0.72).Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, the level of tie did not influence any patient-oriented oncological outcome, neither overall nor in node-positive patients. This would allow the patient's anatomical configuration and the surgeon's preferences to determine the level of tie.
|
|
| 2. |
- Holmgren, Klas, et al.
(author)
-
High stoma prevalence and stoma reversal complications following anterior resection for rectal cancer : a population-based multicentre study
- 2017
-
In: Colorectal Disease. - : Wiley. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 19:12, s. 1067-1075
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- AIM: Fashioning a defunctioning stoma is common when performing an anterior resection for rectal cancer in order to avoid and mitigate the consequences of an anastomotic leakage. We investigated the permanent stoma prevalence, factors influencing stoma outcome and complication rates following stoma reversal surgery.METHOD: Patients who had undergone an anterior resection for rectal cancer between 2007 and 2013 in the northern healthcare region were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry and were followed until the end of 2014 regarding stoma outcome. Data were retrieved by a review of medical records. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate predefined risk factors for stoma permanence. Risk factors for non-reversal of a defunctioning stoma were also analysed, using Cox proportional-hazards regression.RESULTS: A total of 316 patients who underwent anterior resection were included, of whom 274 (87%) were defunctioned primarily. At the end of the follow-up period 24% had a permanent stoma, and 9% of patients who underwent reversal of a stoma experienced major complications requiring a return to theatre, need for intensive care or mortality. Anastomotic leakage and tumour Stage IV were significant risk factors for stoma permanence. In this series, partial mesorectal excision correlated with a stoma-free outcome. Non-reversal was considerably more prevalent among patients with leakage and Stage IV; Stage III patients at first had a decreased reversal rate, which increased after the initial year of surgery.CONCLUSION: Stoma permanence is common after anterior resection, while anastomotic leakage and advanced tumour stage decrease the chances of a stoma-free outcome. Stoma reversal surgery entails a significant risk of major complications.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Kverneng Hultberg, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
Level of vascular tie and its effect on functional outcome 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer
- 2017
-
In: Colorectal Disease. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1462-8910 .- 1463-1318. ; 19:11, s. 987-995
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Aim Previous research indicates that high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery during anterior resection for rectal cancer might be associated with an increased risk of postoperative functional disturbances. The goal of this population-based retrospective cohort study was to further investigate that association.Method Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer from April 2011 to September 2012 were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Bowel and urogenital function were assessed by a postal questionnaire 2 years after surgery. Information on the level of mesenteric tie and clinical variables was retrieved from the registry. The outcome was defined as any defaecatory, urinary or sexual dysfunction as reported by the patient. The association between high tie and the outcome was evaluated with multivariable logistic and linear regression with adjustment for confounders, such as sex, body mass index, comorbidity and preoperative radiation.Results With a response rate of 86%, 805 patients were included in the study. Of these, 46% were operated with high tie. After adjustment for confounders, high tie did not affect the risk of faecal incontinence (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.59-1.22), urinary incontinence (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.63-1.41) or various aspects of sexual dysfunction (erectile dysfunction, anejaculation, dyspareunia and coital vaginal dryness). However, an association between high tie and defaecation at night was detected (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.02-2.03).Conclusion This study does not support that the level of vascular tie influences the risk of major defaecatory, urinary or sexual disturbances 2 years after anterior resection for rectal cancer.
|
|
| 5. |
- Kverneng Hultberg, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer
- 2017
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 43:10, s. 1908-1914
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been widely used in colorectal surgery due to their opioid-sparing effect. However, several studies have indicated an increased risk of anastomotic leakage following NSAID treatment, although conflicting results exist. The primary goal of this study was to further examine whether postoperative NSAIDs are independently associated with anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer during 2007-2013 in 15 different hospitals in three healthcare regions in Sweden were included in the study. Registry data and information from patient records were retrieved. The association between NSAID treatment (for at least two days in the first postoperative week) and symptomatic anastomotic leakage (within 90 days) was evaluated with multiple logistic regression, with adjustment for pertinent confounding factors. Results: Some 1495 patients were included in the study. Of these, 27% received postoperative NSAIDs for at least two days in the first postoperative week. Symptomatic anastomotic leakage occurred in 11% and 14% in the NSAID and non-NSAID group, respectively. With adjustment for confounders, the odds ratio for leakage among patients who received NSAIDs compared with those who did not was 0.88 (95% CI 0.65-1.20). No differences were seen between non-selective and COX-2-selective NSAIDs. Conclusion: Postoperative NSAID treatment does not seem to increase the risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. NSAID use appears to be safe, but a well-powered randomized clinical trial is warranted. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd, BASO similar to The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 6. |
- Kverneng Hultberg, Daniel, 1990-
(author)
-
Surgery for rectal cancer : the impact of perioperative factors
- 2020
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Rectal cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancer forms worldwide. A large proportion of rectal cancer patients are surgically treated with curative intention, with anterior resection being the most frequently used method today. During surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery is either ligated proximal (high tie) or distal to the left colic artery (low tie). It is not known whether the tie level affects the oncologic nor the functional outcome. Postoperatively, about one in ten patients develop an anastomotic leakage. It is unclear whether treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) affects the risk of leakage, or whether having a leakage influences the functional outcome. The general aims of this dissertation were to increase the knowledge of intra- and postoperative treatment for rectal cancer, with the goal of improving the oncologic and functional outcomes, as well as reducing postoperative complications. National registers, predominantly the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, were used in all of the dissertation’s four retrospective cohort studies to identify and retrieve information regarding patients. Various statistical methods have been used in all studies with the aim of eliminating bias, including confounding.In Study I, high tie slightly increased the total number of harvested lymph nodes in the included 8287 patients, as compared with low tie, while the primary outcome cancer-specific survival, as well as secondary oncologic outcomes, were not affected. This indicates that the oncologic outcome does not have to be considered when the surgeon determines the level of tie.In Study II, investigating the effect of tie level on the functional outcome, the outcome was any defecatory or urogenital symptoms two years after anterior resection, assessed with a mailed questionnaire. With a response rate of 86%, 805 patients were included. High tie did not, except for increasing the need of defecation at night, influence the risk of major dysfunction. Again, this would facilitate the choice of tie level.Study III used the same outcome, and in part the same study population, as Study II, but instead with the exposure anastomotic leakage. With a response rate of 82%, 1180 patients were included. We found that anastomotic leakage increased the risk of reduced sexual activity and increased the use of aid products for fecal incontinence after anterior resection, while the risk of urinary incontinence was unexpectedly decreased. Other outcomes were not clearly affected. In Study IV, in addition to the register, information was gathered from patient records. In the included 1495 patients who had undergone anterior resection, postoperative NSAID treatment was not found to increase the risk of symptomatic anastomotic leakage. There were no differences between non-selective and COX-2 selective NSAIDs. This study does not support that NSAID treatment increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after such surgery.
|
|
| 7. |
- Kverneng Hultberg, Daniel, et al.
(author)
-
The Impact of Anastomotic Leakage on Long-Term Function after Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
- 2020
-
In: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. - : American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons. - 0012-3706 .- 1530-0358. ; 63:5, s. 619-628
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: It is still not clear whether anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer affects long-term functional outcome.Objective: To evaluate how anastomotic leakage following anterior resection for rectal cancer influences defecatory, urinary and sexual function.Design: In this retrospective population-based cohort study, patients were identified through the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry, which was also used for information on the exposure variable anastomotic leakage, and covariates.Settings: A nationwide register was used for including patients.Patients: All patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal cancer in Sweden from April 2011– June 2013 were included.Main Outcome Measures: Outcome was any defecatory, sexual or urinary dysfunction, assessed two years after surgery by a postal questionnaire. The association between anastomotic leakage and function was assessed in multivariable logistic and linear regression models, with adjustment for confounding.Results: Response rate was 82%, resulting in 1180 included patients. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 7.5%. A permanent stoma was more common among leak patients (44% vs. 9%; p<0.001). Leakage patients had an increased risk of aid use for fecal incontinence (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.20-4.30) and reduced sexual activity (90% vs. 82%; p=0.003), while the risk of urinary incontinence was decreased (OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.31-0.90). A sensitivity analysis assuming that a permanent stoma was created due to anorectal dysfunction strengthened the negative impact of leakage on defecatory dysfunction.Limitations: Limitations include the used questionnaire not having been previously validated, underreporting of anastomotic leakage in the register, and small patient numbers in the analysis of sexual symptoms.Conclusions:a Anastomotic leakage was found to statistically significantly increase the risk of aid use due to fecal incontinence and reduced sexual activity, though the impact on defecatory dysfunction might be underestimated, as permanent stomas are sometimes fashioned due to anorectal dysfunction. Further research is warranted, especially regarding urogenital function.
|
|
| 8. |
- Rutegård, Martin, et al.
(author)
-
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use and Risk of Anastomotic Leakage after Anterior Resection : A Protocol-Based Study
- 2016
-
In: Digestive Surgery. - : S. Karger AG. - 0253-4886 .- 1421-9883. ; 33:2, s. 129-135
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been introduced as opioid-sparing analgesics in colorectal surgery. However, recent research has implicated these drugs as risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence.Methods: The Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry was used to identify all patients operated with anterior resection for rectal cancer at centres that performed more than 25 abdominal operations per year, from 2007 to 2012, inclusive. The registry provided individual patient data on demographic variables and symptomatic anastomotic leakage. The patient exposure to NSAIDs was defined according to the protocol of the hospital at which the patient was operated. Logistic regression was employed to estimate ORs and 95% CIs, adjusting for confounders.Results: The study cohort comprised 2,605 patients operated at 21 centres. In the NSAID group, 102/1,458 (7.0%) suffered an anastomotic leak, as compared to 124/1,023 (10.8%) in the non-NSAID group. With adjustment for confounding, patients treated at NSAID hospitals had a reduced risk of developing anastomotic leakage (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.96).Conclusions: In this retrospective protocol-based study, NSAIDs did not increase the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The postoperative use of NSAIDs may not be detrimental, but more research is warranted.
|
|
| 9. |
- Rutegård, Martin, et al.
(author)
-
Substantial underreporting of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry
- 2017
-
In: Acta Oncologica. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 56:12, s. 1741-1745
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The causes and effects of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection are difficult to study in small samples and have thus been evaluated using large population-based national registries. To assess the accuracy of such research, registries should be validated continuously. Material and methods: Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer during 2007–2013 in 15 different hospitals in three healthcare regions in Sweden were included in the study. Registry data and information from patient records were retrieved. Registered anastomotic leakage within 30 postoperative days was evaluated, using all available registry data and using only the main variable anastomotic insufficiency. With the consensus definition of anastomotic leakage developed by the International Study Group on Rectal Cancer as reference, validity measures were calculated. Results: Some 1507 patients were included in the study. The negative and positive predictive values for registered anastomotic leakage were 96 and 88%, respectively, while the κ-value amounted to 0.76. The false-negative rate was 29%, whereas the false-positive rate reached 1.3% (the vast majority consisting of actual leaks, but occurring after postoperative day 30). Using the main variable anastomotic insufficiency only, the false-negative rate rose to 41%. Conclusions: There is considerable underreporting of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. It is probable that this causes an underestimation of the true effects of leakage on patient outcomes, and further quality control is needed.
|
|
