| 1. |
- Cornelissen, M. J., et al.
(author)
-
Perinatal complications in patients with unisutural craniosynostosis: An international multicentre retrospective cohort study
- 2017
-
In: Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1010-5182. ; 45:11, s. 1809-1814
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: Craniosynostosis may lead to hampered fetal head molding and birth complications. To study the interaction between single suture craniosynostosis and delivery complications, an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study was performed. Materials and methods: All infants born between 2006 and 2012 in the Netherlands and Sweden with sagittal or metopic suture synostosis were included. All births were included as a reference population. The primary outcome measure was rate of medically assisted labor. The secondary outcomes included method of conception, term of birth and fetal position. Results: We included 152 trigonocephaly patients, 272 scaphocephaly patients and 1.954.141 controls. A higher rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART) was found in patients with trigonocephaly (13%) and scaphocephaly (7%) compared to controls (3%, p < 0.001). Scaphocephaly resulted in more postterm births (8% vs 4%, p < 0.001). Trigonocephaly patients showed more preterm births (11% vs 6%, p < 0.001), breech position was more frequent (10% vs 4%, p = 0.003) and labor was more often induced. Rate of assisted delivery, including cesarean section, was significantly higher in both patient groups. Conclusions: Scaphocephaly leads to more postterm births and an increased rate of cesarean sections. Trigonocephaly is related to ART, and in addition higher rates of breech position and cesarean section are found. Prenatal detection of single suture craniosynostosis could improve perinatal care. (C) 2017 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 2. |
- Eriksson, Margareta, et al.
(author)
-
Early or late bath during the first stage of labour: a randomised study of 200 women.
- 1997
-
In: Midwifery. - 0266-6138. ; 13:3, s. 146-8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- To compare obstetric outcome after a bath offered to women on two different occasions during the first stage of labour. The aim of the study was to determine whether an early bath affected the progress of labour and the use of analgesia when compared with a late bath during the first stage of labour.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Ladfors, Lars, 1951, et al.
(author)
-
Is a speculum examination sufficient for excluding the diagnosis of ruptured fetal membranes?
- 1997
-
In: Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. - 0001-6349. ; 76:8, s. 739-42
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- To determine the false negative rate of a sterile speculum examination for the diagnosis of rupture of the membranes in women not in labor and without visible amniotic fluid at speculum examination. Furthermore, possible risks to the mother and the baby after suspected rupture of the membranes were analyzed.
|
|
| 6. |
- Ladfors, Lars, 1951, et al.
(author)
-
Risk factors for neonatal sepsis in offspring of women with prelabor rupture of the membranes at 34-42 weeks.
- 1998
-
In: Journal of perinatal medicine. - 0300-5577. ; 26:2, s. 94-101
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- One thousand three hundred eighty-five women with PROM (prelabor rupture of the membranes) participated in a prospective randomized study. Women with PROM were randomized to induction the following morning after PROM (early induction group) or induction two days later (late induction group). If contractions started within 2 hours after admission these women were included in the short latency group. All neonatal infections were classified as verified sepsis (positive culture) or clinical sepsis. The aim of the study was to compare the perinatal infectious outcome between the groups with different expectant managements in women with PROM and to study the association between demographic, intrapartum and postpartum variables and neonatal sepsis. In the short latency group one neonate had a proven sepsis while four neonates with proven sepsis were found in the early induction group. No proven sepsis was detected in the late induction group. Univariate analyses showed a significant association between clinical sepsis and: induction of labor (OR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.30-6.68), established labor 24.1-32 hours after ROM (OR = 5.89, 95% CI 1.68-20.63), established labor > 32 hours after ROM (OR = 4.59, 95% CI 1.52-13.87), time from ROM to delivery > 32 hours (OR = 5.07, 95% CI 1.40-18.39), cesarean section (OR = 11.03, 95% CI 4.10-29.68), chorioamnionitis before or during delivery (OR = 27.14, 95% CI 2.38-309.16), endometritis (OR = 18.08, 95% CI 1.82-179.87), CRP over 20 mg/l in the umbilical cord (OR = 17.12, 95% CI 5.68-52.12) and Apgar score < 7 after 1, 5 or 10 minutes. In a stepwise logistic regression analysis a significant association was found between clinical sepsis and cesarean section (OR = 10.08, 95% CI = 3.26-31.20), time from ROM to delivery > 32 h (OR = 3.74, 95% CI 1.62-8.62), gestational age 34-36 weeks (OR = 3.16, 95% CI 1.11-8.96) and parous women (OR = 2.41, 95% CI 1.04-5.57). In conclusion, this study indicates that that there was no difference in the incidence of neonatal infections between those with early and late induction. Clinical neonatal sepsis was associated with time from PROM to delivery over 32 hours, cesarean section, parous women and gestational age between 34 and 36 weeks.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Alkmark, Mårten, 1973, et al.
(author)
-
Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol versus transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS)
- 2021
-
In: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-6349 .- 1600-0412. ; 100:8, s. 1463-1477
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction Induction of labor is increasing. A common indication for induction of labor is late term and postterm pregnancy at 41 weeks or more. We aimed to evaluate if there are any differences regarding efficacy, safety, and women's childbirth experience between oral misoprostol and transvaginal balloon catheter for cervical ripening in women with a low-risk singleton pregnancy and induction of labor at 41(+0) to 42(+0 to 1) weeks of gestation. Material and methods In this observational study, based on data from the Swedish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS), a multicenter randomized controlled trial, a total of 1213 women with a low-risk singleton pregnancy at 41 to 42 weeks of gestation were induced with oral misoprostol (n = 744) or transvaginal balloon catheter (n = 469) at 15 Swedish delivery hospitals. The primary efficacy outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 h and primary safety outcomes were neonatal and maternal composite adverse outcomes. Secondary outcomes included time to vaginal delivery and mode of delivery. Women's childbirth experience was assessed with the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ 2.0) and visual analog scale. We present crude and adjusted mean differences and relative risks (RR) with 95% CI. Adjustment was performed for a propensity score based on delivery hospital and baseline characteristics including Bishop score. Results Vaginal delivery within 24 h was significantly lower in the misoprostol group compared with the balloon catheter group (46.5% [346/744] versus 62.7% [294/469]; adjusted RR 0.76 95% CI 0.640.89]). Primary neonatal and maternal safety outcomes did not differ between groups (neonatal composite 3.5% [36/744] vs 3.2% [15/469]; adjusted RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.31-1.89]; maternal composite 2.3% [17/744] versus 1.9% [9/469]; adjusted RR 1.70 [95% CI 0.58-4.97]). Adjusted mean time to vaginal delivery was increased by 3.8 h (95% CI 1.3-6.2 h) in the misoprostol group. Non-operative vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery rates did not differ. Women's childbirth experience was positive overall and similar in both groups. Conclusion Induction of labor with oral misoprostol compared with a transvaginal balloon catheter was associated with a lower probability of vaginal delivery within 24 h and a longer time to vaginal delivery. However, primary safety outcomes, non-operative vaginal delivery, and women's childbirth experience were similar in both groups. Therefore, both methods can be recommended in women with low-risk postdate pregnancies.
|
|
