| 1. |
- Brahim, Lydia Ould, et al.
(author)
-
The effects of self-management interventions on depressive symptoms in adults with chronic physical disease(s) experiencing depressive symptomatology : a systematic review and meta-analysis
- 2021
-
In: BMC Psychiatry. - : BioMed Central (BMC). - 1471-244X. ; 21:1
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. It is estimated that 20% of adults with chronic physical diseases experience concomitant depression, increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality. Low intensity psychosocial interventions, such as self-management, are part of recommended treatment; however, no systematic review has evaluated the effects of depression self-management interventions for this population. The primary objective was to examine the effect of self-management interventions on reducing depressive symptomatology in adults with chronic disease(s) and co-occurring depressive symptoms. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of these interventions on improving other psychosocial and physiological outcomes (e.g., anxiety, glycemic control) and to assess potential differential effect based on key participant and intervention characteristics (e.g., chronic disease, provider). Methods Studies comparing depression self-management interventions to a control group were identified through a) systematic searches of databases to June 2018 [MEDLINE (1946 -), EMBASE (1996 -), PsycINFO (1967 -), CINAHL (1984 -)] and b) secondary 'snowball' search strategies. The methodological quality of included studies was critically reviewed. Screening of all titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility was assessed independently by two authors. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. Results Fifteen studies were retained: 12 for meta-analysis and three for descriptive review. In total, these trials included 2064 participants and most commonly evaluated interventions for people with cancer (n = 7) or diabetes (n = 4). From baseline to < 6-months (T1), the pooled mean effect size was - 0.47 [95% CI -0.73, - 0.21] as compared to control groups for the primary outcome of depression and - 0.53 [95% CI -0.91, - 0.15] at >= 6-months (T2). Results were also significant for anxiety (T1) and glycemic control (T2). Self-management skills of decision-making and taking action were significant moderators of depression at T1. Conclusion Self-management interventions show promise in improving depression and anxiety in those with concomitant chronic physical disease. The findings may contribute to the development of future Self-management interventions and delivering evidence-based care to this population. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to identify sources of heterogeneity and investigate key intervention components.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lambert, Sylvie D., et al.
(author)
-
Building the capacity for psycho-Oncology research: a survey of the research barriers and training needs within the International Psycho-Oncology Society
- 2020
-
In: Journal of Psychosocial Oncology Research & Practice. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 2637-5974. ; 2:3, s. e023-e023
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: The International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS) is a multidisciplinary professional network that aims to improve psychosocial care for individuals impacted by cancer. IPOS encourages research activity, recognizing that a high-quality evidence base is essential to provide best-practice, data-driven clinical care. This study aimed to determine the barriers to research involvement and the training needs and priorities of IPOS members, with the goal of facilitating the development of training resources tailored to the needs of IPOS members.Methods: A link to an online, cross-sectional survey was disseminated to all registered members of IPOS via email. The online survey platform SimpleSurvey was used, and questions included demographic characteristics and items related to research interests, involvement, and training needs. High priority research training needs were identified as research tasks respondents rated as highly important, yet possessed a low perceived skill level in.Results: Thirty-two percent of IPOS members (n = 142) completed the survey. Participants represented 49 countries and were at a variety of career stages. Overall, participants reported spending an average of 17.3 hours per week on research (range 0-80 hours per week), with 69% of respondents wanting to increase their research involvement. The main barriers to research participation included lack of research funding (80%) and lack of protected time (63%). IPOS members identified 5 high-priority training needs: preparing successful grant applications; preparing research budgets; community-based participatory research; working with decision makers; and finding collaborators or expert consultants. Participants suggested funding access, statistical advisors, and networking and mentorship opportunities as ways to enhance research involvement. Members preferred online training modules (39%) and mentorship programs (19%) as methods by which IPOS could provide research support. IPOS was viewed as being able to contribute to many aspects of research capacity building such as networking, training, and dissemination of research findings.Conclusions: IPOS has an important role in encouraging research capacity building among members. This survey provides an agenda for workshops and training opportunities. Mainly, for respondents it was less about training in research methods and more about training in how to prepare successful grant applications, including budgets, and receiving mentorship on this as well as having opportunities to collaborate with other researchers.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lambert, Sylvie, et al.
(author)
-
Non-pharmacological Interventions for Caregivers with Depression and Caregivers of Care Recipients with Co-morbid Depression : Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- 2021
-
In: Journal of general internal medicine. - : Springer Nature. - 0884-8734 .- 1525-1497. ; 36:10, s. 3159-3178
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Caregivers experiencing depression or caring for people experiencing depression are at risk of high burden. This systematic review examined the effect of non-pharmacological interventions for caregivers that (a) target improving caregivers' depressive symptoms, (b) help caregivers manage the depressive symptoms of the person for whom they provide care, or (c) both (a) and (b).Methods: Eligible trials published between January 1, 1985, and May 30, 2019 were retrieved from five electronic databases. The studies' methodological quality was assessed against 15 criteria. Pooled effect sizes (ESs) were calculated, and heterogeneity assessed using the Higgin's I2 statistic. Meta-regressions were also conducted to identify significant moderators (participant sub-group analyses) and mediators (identify how the interventions worked).Results: Sixteen studies evaluating 18 interventions were included for review. These studies included a total of 2178 participants (mean = 94, SD = 129.18, range 25-518). The most common condition (n = 10/16) of the care recipient was dementia. The average methodological score was in the moderate range (8.76/15). Interventions had a moderate effect on caregivers' depression in the short term (ES = - 0.62, 95% CI - 0.81, - 0.44), but the effect dissipated over time (ES = - 0.19; 95% CI - 0.29, - 0.09). A similar pattern was noted for anxiety. The moderator analysis was not significant, and of the mediators examined, significant ones were self-management skills of taking action, problem solving, and decision-making.Discussion: Non-pharmacological interventions are associated with improvement of depression and anxiety in caregivers, particularly in the short term. The main recommendation for future interventions is to include the self-management skills taking action, problem-solving, and decision-making. Enhancing the effect of these interventions will need to be the focus of future studies, particularly examining the impact of booster sessions. More research is needed on non-dementia caregiving and dyadic approaches.
|
|
