SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Lassen Inger) "

Search: WFRF:(Lassen Inger)

  • Result 1-3 of 3
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Dahlborg, Elisabeth, 1974-, et al. (author)
  • The struggle between welfare state models and prevailing healthcare policy in Scandinavian healthcare legislative documents
  • 2021
  • In: International Journal of Health Governance. - 2059-4631. ; :1, s. 51-64
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Purpose The paper aims to compare and discuss the findings of discursive constructions of patients in legal texts from the three Scandinavian countries. Since traditional welfare state systems in Scandinavia are being challenged by new governance systems, new questions are being raised about patient positions and agency, carrying with them potential ethical dilemmas for healthcare professionals.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology of the paper is inspired by critical discourse analysis. Comprehensively analysing the findings of previous discourse studies on how "the patient" is constructed in central policy texts, this study compares the position of the patient in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.FindingsThe paper reveals ideological struggles across the Scandinavian countries, operating at a political level, a legislative level and a healthcare level. It is shown that national governance systems still exert hegemonic power by strongly influencing patients' degree of choice and autonomy. The discursive struggle between welfare state governance and other governance systems in Scandinavia indicates a shift towards a commercial healthcare market although a traditional welfare model is advocated by professionals and researchersResearch limitations/implicationsBecause of the specific conditions of Scandinavian healthcare policy, the findings lack generalisability. The research approach should therefore be explored further in additional contexts.Practical implicationsThe findings of this study can inform policymakers, professionals and patients of the ideological values underlying seemingly objective shifts in national policy.Originality/valueA comparative critical discourse analysis can expose patterns in the Scandinavian approaches to patient rights.
  •  
2.
  • Devik A., Siri, et al. (author)
  • Variations in drug-related problems detected by multidisciplinary teams in Norwegian nursing homes and home nursing care
  • 2018
  • In: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0281-3432 .- 1502-7724. ; 36:3, s. 291-299
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE:Traditionally, nursing homes have been associated with suboptimal drug therapy and drug-related problems (DRPs). In contrast, less is known about drug safety in homecare. The aim of this study was to describe and compare DRPs in older persons across two care settings: nursing homes and home nursing care.DESIGN:Cross-sectional study using descriptive and inferential statistics.SETTING:Nursing homes (n = 5) and home nursing care units (n = 8) across nine municipalities in the middle of Norway.PARTICIPANTS:Multidisciplinary medication reviews for 61 nursing home residents and 93 patients receiving home nursing care performed over the 2013-2014 period, were mapped and examined (N = 154).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:DRPs classified by a Norwegian Classification Tool.RESULTS:In all, 740 DRPs were detected in the total sample, 227 in nursing homes and 513 in home nursing care. DRPs were significantly higher among patients receiving home-based care (Mean =5.5) compared to patients in nursing homes (Mean =3.7, p = 0.002). Among the problem categories, the need for additional drug was most frequent in nursing homes (p = 0.001), while documentation discrepancies reached the highest numbers in patients receiving home nursing care (p = 0.000). Additionally, patients in home nursing care had more problems concerning adverse reactions (p = 0.060); however, this was not statistically significant. Differences in DRP categories leading to changes in the patients' medication lists were also discovered.CONCLUSIONS:The frequency of unclear documentation and adverse reactions found in the homecare setting is alarming. This is an important issue given the trend in aged care towards caring people in their own homes. Further research is warranted to explore how different care settings may influence the safety of pharmacotherapy for older persons.Key PointsDrug related problems are a significant cause of concern among patients receiving home nursing care as well as for patients living in nursing homes. The findings of this study showed that:Significantly more DRPs were detected among patients receiving home nursing care than patients living in nursing homes.While patients living in nursing homes were often undermedicated, documentation discrepancies were more frequent in home nursing care.DRP categories leading to changes on the medication lists differed between the settings.
  •  
3.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-3 of 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view