SwePub - search: WFRF:(Lauridsen Inger)

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Franzén, Karin, 1958-, et al. (author) Electrical stimulation compared with tolterodine for treatment of urge/urge incontinence amongst women : a randomized controlled trial 2010 In: International Urogynecology Journal. - Berlin, Germany : Springer. - 0937-3462 .- 1433-3023. ; 21:12, s. 1517-1524 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract Introduction and hypothesis: Few randomized controlled trials have compared electrical stimulation treatment with drug therapy. Our hypothesis was that electrical stimulation treatment in women with urgency/urge incontinence would be more efficient compared to drug treatment.Methods: Women ≥18 years of age with urgency/urge incontinence were randomized to receive either ten electrical stimulation treatments vaginally and transanally over a period of 5-7 weeks or tolterodine 4 mg orally once daily.Results: Sixty-one women completed the study. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in micturition rate from baseline to 6 months, mean difference, -0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.61 to 0.82), but a clearly significant difference within each group for electrical stimulation, -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9), and for tolterodine, -3.2 (95% CI, -4.1 to -2.4).Conclusions: Both treatments reduced the number of micturitions, but electrical stimulation was not found to be superior to tolterodine.

Franzén, Karin, 1958-, et al. (author)
Electrical stimulation compared with tolterodine for treatment of urge/urge incontinence amongst women : a randomized controlled trial
2010
In: International Urogynecology Journal. - Berlin, Germany : Springer. - 0937-3462 .- 1433-3023. ; 21:12, s. 1517-1524
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction and hypothesis: Few randomized controlled trials have compared electrical stimulation treatment with drug therapy. Our hypothesis was that electrical stimulation treatment in women with urgency/urge incontinence would be more efficient compared to drug treatment.Methods: Women ≥18 years of age with urgency/urge incontinence were randomized to receive either ten electrical stimulation treatments vaginally and transanally over a period of 5-7 weeks or tolterodine 4 mg orally once daily.Results: Sixty-one women completed the study. There was no significant difference between the two treatment groups in micturition rate from baseline to 6 months, mean difference, -0.40 (95% confidence interval (CI), -1.61 to 0.82), but a clearly significant difference within each group for electrical stimulation, -2.8 (95% CI, -3.7 to -1.9), and for tolterodine, -3.2 (95% CI, -4.1 to -2.4).Conclusions: Both treatments reduced the number of micturitions, but electrical stimulation was not found to be superior to tolterodine.

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Lauridsen Inger) "