1. |
- Andersson, Charlotta, et al.
(författare)
-
Testbäddar för utveckling av högskolepedagogik i framtidens lärandemijöer
- 2024
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Learning Lab är Akademiska Hus koncept med testbäddar som i nära samverkan med lärosäten utformas för att främja innovation, forskning om och utveckling av framtidens lärandemiljöer. En testbädd utgörs av en fysisk plats där rumsdesign, pedagogik, teknik, m.m ges utrymme att prototypas, utforskas och utvärderas för att generera erfarenheter och kunskaper om våra lärandemiljöer. För närvarande driver Akademiska Hus Learning Lab på tre orter tillsammans med Göteborgs universitet, Umeå universitet och Örebro universitet. Miljöerna är designade med olika fokusområden men med en gemensam inriktning – att utforska samspelet mellan pedagogik, sociala förutsättningar, rum och teknik – i syfte att driva högskolepedagogisk utveckling.Syftet med rundabordssamtalet äratt diskutera hur konceptet med testbäddar kan spridas vidare samtatt dela erfarenheter från testbäddarnas arbete med att arbeta med högskolepedagogisk utveckling och utforskandet av fysiska och hybrida lärandemiljöer samtatt stimulera erfarenhetsutbyte inför gemensamma frågeställningar kring högskolepedagogisk utveckling i skärningspunkt mellan pedagogik, rum & teknikRundabordssamtalet genomförs genom att representanter från respektive Learning Lab tillsammans med projektgruppen från Akademiska hus leder ett samtal om hur vi kan sätta pedagogiken i centrum vid utveckling av lärandemiljöer, hur vi skapar nödvändiga stödstrukturer för lärare som utforskar lärandemiljöer och utmaningarna i samverkan inom och mellan lärosätena.Rundabordssamtalet avslutas genom en gemensam digital dokumentation av deltagarnas samtal som görs tillgänglig för konferensens deltagare genom qr-kod/länk efter rundabordssamtalet.För att uppmuntra till deltagande så synliggörs några frågeställningar som rundabordssamtalet strävar efter att behandla:Learning Lab är ett uttryck för en kontext där högskolepedagogisk utveckling uppmuntras, stöttas och utvärderas. Hur uttrycker sig samma fenomen på andra håll utanför Learning Labs ramar?Vilka samtalsforum finns idag där fokus omfattar didaktisk spatial kompetens?Hur upplevs samverkan/samarbete mellan stödfunktioner som IT, lokalförsörjning m.m. i relation till högskolepedagogisk utveckling vid lärosätet? Mellan lärosäten?Hur ser den idealiska lärmiljön ut för en given undervisningssituation med förankring i min pedagogiska grundsyn?
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Andersson, Urban, 1965, et al.
(författare)
-
Författaridentifikatorer och publiceringsdatabaser – scenarier och utvecklingsmöjligheter
- 2013
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Syftet med projektet är att ge underlag för att införa författaridentifikatorer i svenska tjänster och system inom vetenskaplig kommunikation. ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) är en internationell de-facto standard under uppbyggnad med många viktiga aktörer involverade. Implementering av ORCID kräver samverkan mellan flera aktörer, både nationellt och på lärosätena. Projektgruppen lämnar ett antal rekommendationer baserade på de uppgifter som redovisas i rapporten.
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
- Bengtsson, Jonas, et al.
(författare)
-
Sexual function after failed ileal pouch-anal anastomosis
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Crohn's and Colitis. - : Elsevier. - 1873-9946. ; 5:5, s. 407-414
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and AimsFailure of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) occurs in around 10% of the patients. Compared to patients with functioning pouches, health related quality of life is deteriorated after failure. Sexual function in patients with pouch failure is however poorly studied.The aim was to study sexual function in patients with pelvic pouch failure; patients with functioning pouches were used as controls. The hypothesis was that patients with pouch failure have worse sexual function.Methods36 patients with pouch failure were compared with 72 age and sex-matched controls with ulcerative colitis and functioning pouches. The patients answered a set of questionnaires concerning sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI] and International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]), body image (BIS-scale) and health-related quality of life (SF-36).ResultsBoth women and men with pouch failure scored lower than controls in the FSFI and IIEF questionnaires. However, none of the observations were statistically significant. The scores in the failure group (for both sexes) were below the cut-off level for sexual dysfunction. Scores for the BIS instrument were significantly lower for both sexes in the failure group. Women and men in the failure group scored lower than the controls in all domains of the SF-36, however statistically significant only for the social function domain in men.ConclusionsThe hypothesis, that a failed IPAA is associated with worse sexual function, was not confirmed. Compared to patients with functioning pouches, patients with pouch failure have inferior body image.
|
|
7. |
- Block, Mattias, 1968, et al.
(författare)
-
Neoplasia in the colorectal specimens of patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis - need for routine surveillance?
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1502-7708 .- 0036-5521. ; 50:5, s. 528-35
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Patients who undergo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) occasionally have neoplasia in the IPAA. Patients with evidence of dysplasia or carcinoma in the colorectal specimen may have an increased risk of such neoplasia. A surveillance program has been suggested. The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of surveillance of a large patient cohort, and to investigate the prevalences of neoplasia in the ileal pouch mucosa and in the anal transitional zone (ATZ).
|
|
8. |
- Buccheri, Sergio, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical and angiographic outcomes of bioabsorbable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents in Sweden : a report from the Swedish Coronary and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR)
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : Oxford University Press. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 40:31, s. 2607-2615
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Randomized clinical trials have consistently demonstrated the non-inferiority of bioabsorbable polymer drug-eluting stents (BP-DES) with respect to DES having permanent polymers (PP-DES). To date, the comparative performance of BP- and PP-DES in the real world has not been extensively investigated.METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 2011 to June 2016, we analysed the outcomes associated with newer generation DES use in Sweden. After stratification according to the type of DES received at the index procedure, a total of 16 504 and 79 106 stents were included in the BP- and PP-DES groups, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for restenosis at 2 years were 1.2% and 1.4% in BP- and PP-DES groups, respectively. Definite stent thrombosis (ST) was low in both groups (0.5% and 0.7% in BP- and PP-DES groups, respectively). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for either restenosis or definite ST did not differ between BP- and PP-DES [adjusted HR 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-1.21; P = 0.670 and adjusted HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.09; P = 0.151, respectively]. Similarly, there were no differences in the adjusted risk of all-cause death and myocardial infarction (MI) between the two groups (adjusted HR for all-cause death 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.25; P = 0.918 and adjusted HR for MI 1.05, 95% CI 0.93-1.19; P = 0.404).CONCLUSION: In a large, nationwide, and unselected cohort of patients, percutaneous coronary intervention with BP-DES implantation was not associated with an incremental clinical benefit over PP-DES use at 2 years follow-up.
|
|
9. |
- Enstrom, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Does blood pressure differ between users and non-users of hormone replacement therapy? The Women's Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) Study
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Blood Pressure. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0803-7051 .- 1651-1999. ; 11:4, s. 240-243
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To examine whether blood pressure over 24 h differed between postmenopausal women receiving and not receiving hormone replacement therapy. Methods: One group of hormone replacement postmenopausal women (n = 32) and one group of non-hormone replacement (n = 32) postmenopausal women underwent non-invasive 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. They were randomly selected among the 2000 firstly screened women in an ongoing project in Lund, Sweden. The study was designed to detect a difference of 5 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure over 24 h with a power of 80% and 5% significance (two-tailed test). Results: The hormone replacement women had a mean (SD) office blood pressure of 128/76 (12/8) mmHg and the non-hormone replacement 126/78 (16/8) mmHg. Mean ambulatory blood pressure over 24 h, day and night, in the hormone replacement group was 121/72 (11/7), 126/76 (12/8), 111/64 (11/7) mmHg. The corresponding values in the non-hormone replacement group were 118/72 (12/7), 124/77 (12/7), and 107/64 (13/7) ( p > 0.40 for diastolic blood pressure and p > 0.20 for systolic blood pressure). Mean heart rate over 24 h was 71 (7) and 73 (8) beats/min in the hormone and non-hormone replacement groups, respectively. Conclusion: There was no difference in blood pressure or heart rate between the hormone replacement and non-hormone replacement postmenopausal women, either over 24 h or during the day or night. Hormone replacement in postmenopausal women seems not to have an influence on blood pressure, but of course we are aware that this is a cross-sectional study, which has its limitations.
|
|
10. |
- Eriksson, Kerstin Margareta, 1955-, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality of life and cost-effectiveness of a 3-year trial of lifestyle intervention in primary health care
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Archives of Internal Medicine. - Chicago : American Medical Association. - 0003-9926 .- 1538-3679. ; 170:16, s. 1470-1479
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Lifestyle interventions reduce cardiovascular risk and diabetes but reports on long term effects on quality of life (QOL) and health care utilization are rare. The aim was to investigate the impact of a primary health care based lifestyle intervention program on QOL and cost-effectiveness over 3 years.Methods: 151 men and women, age 18-65 yr, at moderate-to-high risk for cardiovascular disease, were randomly assigned to either lifestyle intervention with standard care or standard care alone. Intervention consisted of supervised exercise sessions and diet counseling for 3 months, followed by regular group meetings during 3years. Change in QOL was measured with EuroQol (EQ-5D, EQ VAS), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the SF-6D. The health economic evaluation was performed from a societal view and a treatment perspective. In a cost-utility analysis the costs, gained quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and savings in health care were considered. Cost-effectiveness was also described using the Net Monetary Benefit Method.Results: Significant differences between groups over the 3-yr period were shown in EQ VAS, SF-6D and SF-36 physical component summary but not in EQ-5D or SF-36 mental component summary. There was a net saving of 47 USD per participant. Costs per gained QALY, savings not counted, were 1,668 – 4,813 USD. Probabilities of cost-effectiveness were 89 – 100 %, when 50 000 USD was used as stakeholder’s threshold of willingness to pay for a gained QALY.Conclusion: Lifestyle intervention in primary care improves QOL and is highly cost-effective in relation to standard care.
|
|